Asm. Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn
Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn has represented AD-42 since 2015 in one of New York's most heavily Democratic districts, carrying a D+72 registration lean and a base electoral model of D+80; she ran uncontested in 2020, 2022, and 2024, and in contested cycles never fell below an 81.2-point margin, placing her in the Safe D category across all modeled environments. The district is a majority-Black urban constituency — 53.2% Black, 20.3% white, 14.4% Hispanic — with a 22.2% homeownership rate, a 15.8% poverty rate, and a median household income of $79,710, set against a voter registration breakdown of 76.6% Democrat and 5.0% Republican. In the 2025 session, Bichotte Hermelyn sponsored 149 bills, with her heaviest concentrations in Executive law (23 bills), Education (13 bills), Public Health (12 bills), and State Finance (10 bills), reflecting a broad legislative portfolio spanning government operations, social services, insurance, and real property.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (49) AI
Debate centered on timing of the study relative to previously-enacted doula legislation. Sponsor Bichotte Hermelyn explained the bill would require the Department of Health to conduct a comprehensive study examining integration of doula care in birthing centers, hospitals, and other healthcare delivery facilities, including review of existing programs and identification of successful integration models. Assemblyman Jensen, while supporting the bill and noting his personal use of doula services, questioned whether passing a study bill before all components of previously-enacted doula legislation had fully gone into effect was premature. Bichotte Hermelyn countered that the State should not wait for full program rollout to assess other aspects, particularly given the maternal mortality crisis disproportionately affecting Black women.
Advocated for the study to proceed while existing doula programs are being rolled out, emphasizing the urgent need to address New York's maternal mortality crisis, which disproportionately affects Black women at rates three to four times higher than white women. Argued that concurrent assessment of doula integration models would help identify best practices.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition (1) AI
Expressed deep concern about the risk of targeting vulnerable communities of color given historical health disparities. Noted that her request for a study on misuse and mental competency determination was dismissed.
Electoral History AD-42
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Rodneyse Bichotte 100.0% (34,509) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Rodneyse Bichotte 100.0% (22,255) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Rodneyse Bichotte 100.0% (39,649) | Uncontested | — |
| 2018 | Rodneyse Bichotte 90.6% (28,612) | Matthew Williams 7.2% (2,264) | 83.4pts |
| 2016 | Rodneyse Bichotte 90.6% (34,379) | Matthew Williams 9.4% (3,562) | 81.2pts |
| 2014 | Rodneyse Bichotte 90.3% (12,716) | Matthew G. Williams 5.9% (837) | 84.4pts |
| 2012 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 100.0% (31,891) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 92.4% (15,363) | Alan Kesler 7.6% (1,260) | 84.8pts |
| 2008 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 93.9% (25,108) | Alan Kesler 6.1% (1,643) | 87.8pts |
| 2006 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 94.1% (11,073) | Harriet Katz 5.9% (697) | 88.2pts |
| 2004 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 93.1% (21,798) | Harriet Katz 6.9% (1,606) | 86.2pts |
| 2002 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 100.0% (10,812) | Uncontested | — |
| 2000 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 82.0% (17,418) | Zacary Lareche 15.1% (3,207) | 66.9pts |
| 1998 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 93.0% (11,180) | Rock Hermon Hackshaw 3.7% (445) | 89.3pts |
| 1996 | Rhoda S. Jacobs 99.2% (13,585) | Richard Hartley 0.8% (109) | 98.4pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 (Democratic) | Rodneyse Bichotte 71.9% (10,821) | Victor Jordan 28.1% (4,233) | 43.8pts |
| 2016 (Democratic) | Rodneyse Bichotte 78.8% (2,471) | Victor A. Jordan 21.2% (666) | 57.6pts |
| 2014 (Democratic) | Rodneyse Bichotte 48.9% (2,758) | L. Rickie Tulloch 30.1% (1,696) | 18.8pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-42
Base lean: D+80
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+80). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 42 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity 2023
Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records filed with the Ethics Commission — not individual meetings.
Top Lobbying Issues
Top Organizations Lobbying This Member
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. ★ Chair = lobbying issue overlaps with a committee this member chairs. ↔ Overlap = matches committee membership or bill sponsorship focus.