← All Assembly Members
R
Asm. Michael J. Fitzpatrick
District 8
Republican
First elected 2009
Michael J. Fitzpatrick (R-AD-8) represents a heavily Republican district rated R+14 in partisan lean, with voter registration showing 39.7% Republican versus 25.7% Democrat and 29.4% Independent; his 2026 electoral outlook is rated Safe R across all modeled environments, and his recent general election margins have been consistently wide, including 32.0 points over Steven P. Basileo in 2024 and 36.6 points in 2022. AD-8 is a high-income, predominantly white (79.8%), owner-occupied suburban district with a median household income of $148,354, an 88.2% homeownership rate, a 4.4% poverty rate, and a population of 134,194. First elected in 2009 and now in his 16th year in the chamber, Fitzpatrick sponsored 47 bills in the 2025 session, with sponsorship concentrated in Public Health (4 bills), Tax (4 bills), Education (3 bills), Private Housing Finance (3 bills), and Retirement and Social Security (3 bills), and he logged 17 joint hearing engagements.AI
Vulnerability Index AD-8
Base lean: R+28
Favorable D
Neutral
Favorable R
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (R+28). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts. Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/1/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
Electoral History AD-8
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 66.0% (50,568) | Steven P. Basileo 34.0% (26,016) | 32.0pts |
| 2022 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 68.3% (41,748) | Jeanine Aponte 31.7% (19,376) | 36.6pts |
| 2020 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 64.4% (46,615) | Dylan G. Rice 35.6% (25,809) | 28.8pts |
| 2018 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 61.0% (31,957) | David J. Morrissey 39.0% (20,459) | 22.0pts |
| 2016 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 69.4% (43,286) | Richard S. Macellaro 30.6% (19,121) | 38.8pts |
| 2014 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 65.3% (22,184) | Jason E. Zove 34.7% (11,770) | 30.6pts |
| 2012 | Michael J. Fitzpatrick 69.7% (35,842) | Jesse A. Safer 30.3% (15,586) | 39.4pts |
| 2010 | Philip M. Boyle 71.0% (23,751) | Janice A. Sweet 29.0% (9,714) | 42.0pts |
| 2008 | Philip M. Boyle 60.5% (29,449) | Elizabeth А. Bloom 39.5% (19,198) | 21.0pts |
| 2006 | Philip M. Boyle 60.9% (19,088) | Dennis M. Cohen 39.1% (12,261) | 21.8pts |
| 2004 | Thomas F. Barraga 65.3% (31,971) | Bridget S. Middleton 34.7% (17,023) | 30.6pts |
| 2002 | Thomas F. Barraga 73.3% (21,693) | Lauren Van Kirk 26.7% (7,889) | 46.6pts |
| 2000 | Philip M. Boyle 62.6% (25,027) | Willard L. Christy 33.1% (13,233) | 29.5pts |
| 1998 | Philip M. Boyle 66.9% (18,944) | Kenneth S. Beskin 30.3% (8,580) | 36.6pts |
| 1996 | Philip M. Boyle 60.0% (22,794) | Jeffrey Arlen Spinner 33.7% (12,807) | 26.3pts |
Special Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Philip M. Boyle 66.0% (6,253) | Ernie Mattace 34.0% (3,228) | 32.0pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Voter Registration
District 8 Profile
Population
134,194
Median income
$148,354
Median rent
$2,326
Homeownership
88.2%
Education (BA+)
52.0%
Poverty rate
4.4%
Uninsured rate
2.5%
Unemployment rate
4.2%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Demographics
White
79.8%
Black
2.2%
Hispanic
12.2%
Asian
6.0%
Median age
44.3
Foreign born
11.0%
Limited English households
1.7%
Veterans
4.6%
Disability rate
9.1%
Commute Mode
Drive alone
73.7%
Public transit
4.7%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bills sponsored
47
Joint hearing appearances
17
Floor debate appearances
25
Years in office
17
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Joint hearing appearances from NYS Senate hearing transcripts.
Floor Session Activity 2025–2026
A00382-A
PASSED
2026-03-25
An act to amend the Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, in relation to advertising restrictions for mobile sports wagering licensees
The Assembly passed A00382-A, sponsored by Assemblyman Vanel, extending existing casino advertising restrictions to mobile sports wagering licensees. The bill requires truthful and transparent advertising, opt-out mechanisms for consumers, and mandates that the New York State gambling helpline (1-877-8-HOPENY) be clearly displayed throughout video advertisements. Vanel defended the New York-specific helpline requirement as necessary to track problem gambling data and connect New Yorkers to local providers. Debate revealed concerns from members Walsh and Jensen about the practical burden on companies running national or international advertisements, particularly for major sporting events. Assemblywoman Woerner supported the requirement, noting the state helpline connects callers to nearby providers in crisis situations. Assemblyman Morinello criticized the underlying sports betting law as fundamentally flawed, while Assemblyman Fitzpatrick raised concerns about advertising targeting young people and the lack of private right of action for families harmed by problem gambling. The bill passed without a recorded vote tally.
A08518
PASSED
2026-03-25
An act to amend the Insurance Law, in relation to requiring insurance coverage of outpatient problem gambling services
The Assembly passed A08518, sponsored by Asm. Steck, requiring insurance coverage of outpatient problem gambling services on par with alcoholism and substance use disorder treatment. The bill addresses what Steck called a "crisis" in New York, where sports betting has exploded into a $260.4 million monthly revenue generator as of December 2025, with particular impact on young men ages 18-25. The measure was narrowed from the Governor's version to limit cost concerns. Debate centered on whether existing mental health parity laws already mandate such coverage and whether the state should increase its $12 million treatment fund rather than shift costs to insurers. Asm. Fitzpatrick, who previously opposed similar measures, voted affirmatively, citing the real financial devastation gambling addiction causes families. Asm. Pirozzolo voted yes reluctantly, objecting that the state is forcing private companies to remedy problems the state itself created through legalization and promotion of gambling.
A06285
PASSED
2026-03-24
Mobile Sports Betting Monthly Invoice Bill
The Assembly passed a bill sponsored by Assemblymember Kassay requiring mobile sports betting apps to send monthly invoices to users detailing wagering amounts, winnings, losses, and betting habits, along with problem gambling hotline information. The bill takes effect January 1st following the Governor's signature. Kassay cited alarming statistics: $26 billion wagered in New York in 2025, a 26 percent spike in problem gambling hotline calls, and research suggesting 22 percent of bettors exhibit signs of problem gambling. She noted that minors are accessing betting apps through VPNs and becoming addicted at young ages. Supporters including Ms. Woerner cited expert testimony that providing wagering information helps change behavior. However, Assemblymember Morinello, drawing on his experience representing bookmakers, argued the invoices are ineffective because users already have access to betting information and the real problem is the addictive nature of mobile betting itself. He criticized the state's legalization of mobile betting as a "money grab" without consideration for families and youth. Fitzpatrick similarly opposed the bill, arguing the best solution is to prohibit mobile gambling for ages 18-25 and criticizing the state for promoting VLTs, marijuana, and mobile sports betting to young people. Despite the opposition, the bill passed.
A8662-A
PASSED
2025-06-17
LLC Transparency Act - Definition Codification (Technical Amendment)
The Assembly passed A8662-A, a technical amendment to the LLC Transparency Act that codifies Federal beneficial ownership definitions into state law. Sponsor Asm. Gallagher characterized the bill as a necessary fix to fill a gap created when Federal law changed, maintaining no new policy or exemptions were introduced. However, opponents including Asm. Blumencranz and Asm. Ra argued the bill represents substantive policy-making, not a technical fix, as it explicitly places into state law definitions previously referenced by Federal citation. Critics raised concerns about duplicative compliance burdens on small businesses, data security risks, and the bill's exemption of large financial institutions while targeting smaller LLCs. The Business Council strongly opposed the legislation, calling it regulatory overreach that will accelerate business exodus from New York. A procedural dispute arose over whether questions about Federal enforcement changes were germane; the Acting Speaker ruled they were not, and that ruling was upheld on appeal. The bill passed on a party-line vote, with the Republican Conference voting in opposition.
A07777 / S01099
PASSED
2025-06-17
Freedom to Read Act - amending Education Law to empower school libraries to develop diverse, developmentally appropriate collections
The New York State Assembly passed the 'Freedom to Read Act' (A07777/S01099) on June 17, 2025, after extensive debate over the bill's delegation of authority to the State Education Commissioner. Sponsored by Assemblyman Simone, the bill directs the Commissioner to establish policies ensuring school libraries develop diverse, developmentally appropriate collections. Supporters argued the measure addresses real censorship concerns, citing examples of inappropriate book challenges such as removal of science texts. Critics, including Assemblymen Gandolfo, Bologna, Durso, and Fitzpatrick, expressed concerns that the bill shifts decision-making power from local school districts to the state level, potentially undermining parental involvement and local control. The bill does not explicitly define "developmentally appropriate" and leaves appeal procedures unclear. Republicans generally opposed the measure, though the Democratic majority voted in favor. Assemblymen Bologna and Durso voted against the bill, citing concerns about centralized state authority over local school boards.
A777
PASSED
2025-06-17
Library book collection management and school library materials
The Assembly passed A777, legislation that grants the State Education Commissioner authority over school library book collections, in a contentious floor debate on June 17 that exposed deep divisions over intellectual freedom, parental rights, and local control. Supporters, including Assemblywoman Shimsky, argued the bill protects students' access to books that help them understand their identities and prevents censorship that corrodes democracy. Opponents, led by Assemblyman Durso and others, contended the measure strips authority from locally elected school boards and parents, arguing the real issue is age-appropriate placement of sexually explicit materials in children's sections, not book banning. Several members expressed concerns about granting excessive power to the Education Commissioner. The bill passed without a recorded tally being announced in this segment.
A07884-A
PASSED
2025-06-16
An act in relation to authorizing the Town of Smithtown assessor to accept an application for a real property tax exemption from Tiegerman Community Services, Inc.
A06576-B
PASSED
2025-06-16
Thruway toll exemption for Central New York I-81 construction
The Assembly passed legislation providing a temporary toll exemption on select New York State Thruway exits in Central New York during the I-81 reconstruction project. Sponsor Asm. Magnarelli said the measure is necessary to divert local traffic from congested side roads and improve safety during the major construction undertaking in the Syracuse area. The bill allows the Thruway Authority to implement fees if needed to offset lost revenue, estimated at approximately $11 million annually based on 2016 permit data. Opponents, including Asm. Fitzpatrick and Asm. Reilly, warned the five-year temporary exemption will likely be extended, setting a precedent for other regions to demand similar benefits. Asm. Reilly drew parallels to Staten Island's annual fight to maintain Verrazano Bridge resident discounts. The bill passed with Asm. Glick voting in the affirmative after requesting to explain her vote.
A05900
PASSED
2025-06-13
An act authorizing the County of Suffolk to alienate certain lands used as parklands and to dedicate certain other lands as parklands.
A06956-A
PASSED
2025-06-10
An act to amend Chapter 7 of the Laws of 1955, relating to incorporating the Hauppauge Volunteer Exempt Firemen's Benevolent Association, and providing for its powers and duties, in relation to the name of such association and the use of foreign fire insurance premium taxes
A01417-B
2025-06-10
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to the use of algorithmic pricing by a landlord for the purpose of determining the amount of rent to charge a residential tenant
A04172 / S05174
PASSED
2025-06-10
Algorithmic collusion and price fixing in residential rental housing
The Assembly passed legislation sponsored by Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal that extends New York's antitrust law to algorithmic price fixing in residential rental housing. The bill, A04172/S05174, clarifies that using algorithms to coordinate pricing among landlords violates the state's Donnelly Act, which has been law since 1899. Rosenthal argued the measure gives the Attorney General tools to prosecute conduct already illegal when done by humans, citing examples from Washington D.C., Philadelphia, and other jurisdictions where companies like RealPage have orchestrated collusion. The bill requires three specific functions—collecting pricing data from multiple landlords, analyzing it algorithmically, and recommending prices—to constitute illegal collusion, and includes a 'knowingly or reckless disregard' standard. Opponents, including Assemblyman Peter Fitzpatrick and Assemblyman DiPietro, argued there is no evidence of algorithmic collusion in New York State and characterized the bill as government overreach that will discourage landlord investment and worsen housing shortages. The Republican Conference voted against the bill; the Majority Conference voted in favor.
A06956-A
PASSED
2025-06-10
An act to amend Chapter 7 of the Laws of 1955, relating to incorporating the Hauppauge Volunteer Exempt Firemen's Benevolent Association, and providing for its powers and duties, in relation to the name of such association and the use of foreign fire insurance premium taxes
A01417-B
2025-06-10
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to the use of algorithmic pricing by a landlord for the purpose of determining the amount of rent to charge a residential tenant
A06651
PASSED
2025-06-10
An act relating to algorithmic collusion and price fixing in residential rental markets
The Assembly passed legislation sponsored by Asm. Rosenthal that extends New York's antitrust protections to algorithmic price fixing in residential rental markets. The bill clarifies that using algorithms to coordinate pricing among landlords violates the Donnelly Act, which has governed price fixing since 1899. Rosenthal cited examples from Washington D.C., Philadelphia, and other jurisdictions where software like RealPage was used to inflate rents across thousands of units. The measure requires three specific functions—data collection from multiple landlords, algorithmic analysis, and price recommendations—to constitute illegal collusion, and includes a 'knowingly or reckless disregard' standard. Opponents, led by Asm. Fitzpatrick, argued the bill represents premature government intervention without documented cases of algorithmic price fixing in New York State, and contended that the state's strict rent regulations already prevent such practices. Fitzpatrick also questioned why the bill targets only housing when AI-driven pricing occurs across industries. The bill passed with support from Asm. Gallagher, who noted rents in her district have risen 40 percent, and Mrs. Peoples-Stokes, who acknowledged the bill addresses real concerns even as technology continues to evolve.
A01865-A
PASSED
2025-05-13
An act to amend the Real Property Law, in relation to the installation of appliances or fixtures by tenants
The Assembly passed A01865-A, sponsored by Asm. Rosenthal, allowing residential tenants to install appliances and fixtures in rental units with landlord written consent, provided installations comply with applicable building codes. The bill addresses tenant complaints about landlords unreasonably denying requests to upgrade worn or inefficient appliances. Rosenthal argued the measure is narrow and places all costs on tenants, who must restore units upon lease termination. Opponents, including Asm. Fitzpatrick and Asm. Bologna, raised concerns about property owner rights and infrastructure burdens on older buildings. Fitzpatrick argued the bill imposes additional mandates on landlords already struggling with rising operational costs and rent restrictions. Bologna questioned ambiguities regarding electrical capacity, plumbing modifications, and what constitutes valid grounds for denial. The bill passed without a recorded vote tally being announced in this segment.
A05660 / S4106
PASSED
2025-04-29
Medical Aid in Dying Act (Death with Dignity)
The New York State Assembly passed landmark medical aid in dying legislation on Tuesday, April 29, establishing a program allowing terminally ill patients with less than six months to live to request medication to end their lives. The bill, sponsored by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, passed after an emotional floor debate that transcended party lines, with members sharing deeply personal experiences of family deaths and end-of-life suffering. Supporters cited 30 years of data from ten states and Washington D.C. showing no abuse under similar laws, while opponents raised concerns about vulnerable populations, the adequacy of hospice care, and the vagueness of the six-month terminal illness standard. The legislation includes strict safeguards requiring multiple physician evaluations and a 15-day waiting period. The vote came after Paulin's 11-year effort to bring the bill to the floor.
A00718
PASSED
2024-06-04
Direct the Division of Housing and Community Renewal to study non-rental fees charged by landlords
The Assembly passed A718, sponsored by Asm. Dinowitz, requiring the Division of Housing and Community Renewal to study non-rental fees charged by landlords of rent-regulated housing. The bill aims to provide the Legislature with comprehensive data on fees commonly charged, their amounts, and how they are determined. Dinowitz argued the study would help identify potential abuses, noting that many tenants do not file formal complaints with DHCR. Asm. Fitzpatrick opposed the measure, characterizing it as a solution in search of a problem. He noted that 7,000 complaints out of approximately one million rent-regulated units does not constitute a significant problem and can be addressed through existing DHCR enforcement mechanisms. Fitzpatrick also expressed concern the study was a precursor to banning surcharges entirely, which would force property owners to absorb costs for aging infrastructure and rising utility expenses. The Democratic Conference supported the bill; the Republican Conference opposed it.
A00718
PASSED
2024-06-04
Direct the Division of Housing and Community Renewal to study non-rental fees charged by landlords
The Assembly passed A718, sponsored by Asm. Dinowitz, requiring the Division of Housing and Community Renewal to study non-rental fees charged by landlords of rent-regulated housing. The bill directs DHCR to report to the Legislature by April 1 on fees commonly charged, their amounts, and how they are determined. Dinowitz argued the study would help identify potential abuses of surcharges for appliances and services. Asm. Fitzpatrick opposed the measure, calling it "a solution in search of a problem," noting that 7,000 complaints out of approximately one million rent-regulated units does not indicate a widespread issue that cannot be addressed through existing enforcement mechanisms. Fitzpatrick also expressed concern the study could be used to justify eliminating surcharges entirely, forcing property owners to absorb costs for aging infrastructure. The Democratic Conference supported the bill; the Republican Conference opposed it.
A04047-B
2023-06-20
An act to apply the Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act of 2019 to rent calculations and rent records maintenance and destruction
The Assembly debated legislation (A04047-B) sponsored by Assemblyman Dinowitz and Assemblywoman Rosenthal to clarify the prospective application of the 2019 Housing Stability and Tenant Protection Act to rent overcharge cases. Dinowitz argued the bill implements the Court of Appeals' narrow 2020 ruling in Regina Metropolitan Company v. DHCR, which struck down only the retroactive application of Part F while leaving prospective application intact. The bill would allow courts and the Department of Housing and Community Renewal to examine full rental histories to identify illegal rent increases for apartments post-June 2019. Assemblyman Fitzpatrick opposed the measure, contending it unfairly exposes building owners to liability for actions taken under prior law and creates unreasonable lookback periods when records may be unavailable. The debate remained unresolved at the end of the transcript segment.
A06216-B / S____
PASSED
2023-06-20
An act to amend the Administrative Code of the City of New York and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of Nineteen Seventy-Four, in relation to establishing the legal regulated rent for the combination of two or more vacant apartments; to amend the Public Housing Law, in relation to defining permanently vacated; to amend the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of Nineteen Seventy-Four, in relation to exemptions from rent stabilization on the basis of substantial rehabilitation; and to repeal paragraph (d) of Subdivision 4 of Section 14 of the Public Housing Law, in relation there to (Part A); to define clearly the scope of the fraud exception to the pre-HSTPA four-year rule for calculating rents (Part B); and to amend the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Emergency Tenant Protection Act of Nineteen Seventy-Four and the Public Housing Law, in relation to the failure of owners to file rent registration statements and the enforcement powers of the commissioner of housing and community renewal (Part C).
The Assembly passed A06216-B, a comprehensive rent regulation bill sponsored by Assemblywoman Rosenthal that addresses apartment combinations, succession rights, substantial rehabilitation exemptions, and fraud standards in rent-stabilized housing. The bill establishes formulas for setting rents when regulated units are combined with other units, clarifies that succession rights trigger when the original leaseholder physically departs, requires landlords claiming substantial rehabilitation exemptions to seek DHCR approval within one year, and codifies fraud standards for pre-HSTPA rent calculations, including a $500-per-unit-per-month penalty for failure to register rent-stabilized apartments. Republicans, led by Assemblyman Fitzpatrick, opposed the measure, arguing it breaks with decades of precedent, discourages housing investment, and unfairly burdens landlords by presuming fraud. Assemblyman Ra raised due process concerns, contending the bill shifts the burden to landlords to disprove fraud rather than requiring tenants to prove it, particularly regarding J51 tax abatement deregulations where conflicting court decisions have created uncertainty. Assemblyman Slater questioned whether the bill addresses the housing crisis and approximately 45,000 vacant units in New York City. Democrats argued the bill prevents circumvention of rent regulation and protects tenants from harassment. The bill advanced on a party-line vote, with the Democratic majority supporting it.
A02888 / S02888
PASSED
2023-06-07
An act relating to requiring automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) at youth sports programs, camps, and day camps
The Assembly passed legislation requiring automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) at youth sports programs, camps, and day camps, with sponsors citing life-saving potential and opponents warning of unfunded mandate burdens on volunteer organizations. Asm. Otis's bill requires youth sports programs to submit implementation plans to the Department of Health within 18 months and mandates trained personnel and AED equipment at practices and games. Supporters pointed to the 2002 school AED law, which has saved an estimated 110 lives in New York schools, and cited recent high-profile cardiac events including Buffalo Bills player Damar Hamlin's on-field collapse. Multiple members shared personal stories of lives saved by AEDs. However, Asm. Goodell and others raised concerns that the $1,500 equipment cost and $2,000-per-day fines would effectively shut down volunteer-run Little League, soccer, and other youth sports programs in rural areas, particularly where trained volunteers may not always be available. Goodell noted the bill contains no state funding to support implementation. Asm. Manktelow questioned how Amish communities, which do not use electricity, would comply. Otis acknowledged the Public Health Department has authority to waive or reduce fines and stated the 18-month timeline allows for phased implementation. The bill passed with five members voting in opposition.
A06731
PASSED
2023-06-05
Providing accidental disability retirement for deputy sheriffs in Suffolk County
The Assembly passed A06731, which provides accidental disability retirement benefits for deputy sheriffs in Suffolk County. Assemblymember Fitzpatrick voted against the measure, arguing that pension enhancements should be negotiated through collective bargaining rather than enacted unilaterally by the Legislature. Fitzpatrick contended that such benefit increases, enacted without offsetting concessions from labor, contribute to New York's high tax burden and the exodus of residents from the state.
A05205
PASSED
2023-05-24
An act to amend the Retirement and Social Security Law, in relation to providing a lung disease presumption for correction officers, correction supervisors, deputy sheriff patrol, or deputy sheriff patrol supervisors
The Assembly passed A05205, sponsored by Asm. Pheffer Amato, providing a lung disease presumption for correction officers and deputy sheriffs. Asm. Fitzpatrick opposed the measure, arguing that benefit enhancements should be negotiated through collective bargaining rather than enacted unilaterally, and that the other side should offset taxpayer costs.
A05208
PASSED
2023-05-24
An act to amend the Retirement and Social Security Law, in relation to providing a heart disease presumption for correction officers, correction supervisors, deputy sheriff patrol or deputy sheriff patrol supervisors
The Assembly passed A05208, sponsored by Asm. Pheffer Amato, providing a heart disease presumption for correction officers and deputy sheriffs. Asm. Fitzpatrick opposed the measure on the same grounds as the previous bill, arguing benefit enhancements should be negotiated through collective bargaining with offsetting costs rather than enacted unilaterally.
Source: Official NY Assembly floor session transcripts (Granicus). AI-processed. Includes sessions from 2023 onward where transcripts are available.
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset (JCOPE filings targeting Assembly members).
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.