Asm. Deborah Glick
Deborah Glick has represented AD-66 since 1996 and holds one of the most secure seats in the New York State Assembly, with a district partisan lean of D+60, a voter registration breakdown of 68.5% Democrat and 8.0% Republican, and a base lean of D+70 in the 2026 electoral model — rated Safe D across all scenarios. Glick ran uncontested in 2024 and 2022, and her most competitive recent contest was a 64.8-point margin win in 2018; her district is a high-income, highly educated Manhattan enclave with a median household income of $169,421, an 85.4% bachelor's degree attainment rate, a median rent of $3,258, and a 33.9% homeownership rate. In the 2025 session, Glick sponsored 87 bills, with a pronounced concentration in Environmental Conservation (35 bills), followed by Public Health, Vehicle and Traffic (4 bills each), and Education, Executive, New York City Administrative Code, Real Property, and State Finance (3 bills each), reflecting a long-standing legislative focus on environmental policy. No committee chairmanship is listed in this brief, and no lobbying sector overlap flag is indicated in the available data.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (50) AI
Thanked the sponsor for the measure and acknowledged the vital importance of independent pharmacies to communities.
Supported the bill, noting organized efforts to remove books from libraries and warning that restricting access to information does not lead to good outcomes, citing historical examples of book banning.
Debate focused on the three-tier system for alcohol distribution. Opponent argued the bill undermines a system employing thousands of Teamsters and generating substantial tax revenue, characterizing it as favoring special interests at the expense of the broader economy.
Carried a similar bill for homeowners years ago and reported no increase in insurance costs or denials. Noted that mild-seeming breeds can become biters if ill-treated, while large breeds can be placid, so discrimination should be based on individual animals, not breed.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-66
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Deborah J. Glick 100.0% (47,097) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Deborah J. Glick 100.0% (37,666) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Deborah J. Glick 85.0% (47,688) | Tamara Lashchyk 15.0% (8,431) | 70.0pts |
| 2018 | Deborah J. Glick 82.4% (37,419) | Cynthia E. Nixon 17.6% (8,013) | 64.8pts |
| 2016 | Deborah J. Glick 100.0% (50,531) | Uncontested | — |
| 2014 | Deborah J. Glick 79.7% (16,817) | Nekeshia Woods 12.9% (2,727) | 66.8pts |
| 2012 | Deborah J. Glick 100.0% (40,142) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Deborah J. Glick 86.7% (28,774) | William Buran 13.3% (4,426) | 73.4pts |
| 2008 | Deborah J. Glick 100.0% (49,943) | Uncontested | — |
| 2006 | Deborah J. Glick 100.0% (33,667) | Uncontested | — |
| 2004 | Deborah J. Glick 97.6% (50,326) | Nic Leobold 2.4% (1,244) | 95.2pts |
| 2002 | Deborah J. Glick 86.0% (26,427) | Jak Karako 14.0% (4,311) | 72.0pts |
| 2000 | Deborah J. Glick 84.3% (44,063) | Joseph Mauriello 14.3% (7,486) | 70.0pts |
| 1998 | Deborah J. Glick 88.4% (31,095) | Joseph Mauriello 11.6% (4,083) | 76.8pts |
| 1996 | Deborah J. Glick 86.3% (37,338) | Alice Peterson 13.7% (5,945) | 72.6pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 (Working Families) | Douglass Seidman 85.7% (6) | Deborah Glick 14.3% (1) | 71.4pts |
| 2018 (Reform) | Stephen Delger 14.3% (1) | Uncontested | ⚡ 0.0pts |
| 2016 (Democratic) | Deborah J. Glick 80.2% (3,383) | Jim Fouratt 19.8% (835) | 60.4pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-66
Base lean: D+70
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+70). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 66 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.