Asm. Charles Lavine
Charles Lavine (D-AD-13) has represented a D+15 district on Long Island since 2004, but has faced a notably tightened electoral environment in recent cycles — winning by 10.0 points over the same opponent in 2024 after a 9.2-point margin in 2022, both flagged competitive compared to margins exceeding 26 points in prior cycles; the district's 2026 scenario model rates it Likely D even in a neutral environment. AD-13 is a high-income, majority-homeowner suburban district with a median household income of $141,239, 73.2% homeownership, and a racially diverse population that is 52.5% white, 24.1% Hispanic, 15.4% Asian, and 7.7% Black, with Democrats holding a registration edge of 40.5% to Republicans' 25.2% and a substantial 30.5% independent bloc. Lavine's 120 sponsored bills in the 2025 session concentrate heavily in Executive law (10 bills), Civil Practice Law and Rules (9 bills), and Penal law (9 bills), with additional focus on Insurance, Criminal Procedure, Domestic Relations, Judiciary, and Vehicle and Traffic law, reflecting a legal and procedural sponsorship profile consistent with his long tenure.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (50) AI
The bill represents something good emerging from tragedy, commending the sponsor and advocates for their work on this important measure.
Commended the sponsor and noted a similar law he authored requiring Nazi-stolen materials to bear placards. Emphasized that recognizing both strengths and faults of American history is essential to preserving democracy and enabling future generations to do the same.
Argued the amendment improves an inefficient process by streamlining voting requirements to simple majority (consistent with other constitutional provisions), clarifying redistricting principles, and ensuring the Legislature has primary responsibility for remedying violations. Emphasized that compactness is impractical in rural areas and that community-of-interest protections remain central.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-13
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Charles D. Lavine 55.0% (30,850) | Ruka Anzai 45.0% (25,200) | 10.0pts |
| 2022 | Charles D. Lavine 54.6% (22,702) | Ruka Anzai 45.4% (18,865) | ⚡ 9.2pts |
| 2020 | Charles D. Lavine 63.2% (39,446) | Andrew A. Monteleone 36.8% (23,015) | 26.4pts |
| 2018 | Charles D. Lavine 68.1% (31,602) | Andrew A. Monteleone 31.9% (14,804) | 36.2pts |
| 2016 | Charles D. Lavine 62.7% (34,314) | Jeffrey S. Vitale 36.1% (19,735) | 26.6pts |
| 2014 | Charles D. Lavine 60.2% (17,687) | Louis Imbroto 38.4% (11,290) | 21.8pts |
| 2012 | Charles D. Lavine 63.3% (29,089) | Louis Imbroto 35.8% (16,470) | 27.5pts |
| 2010 | Charles D. Lavine 56.0% (21,594) | Robert A. Germino, Jr. 44.0% (16,996) | 12.0pts |
| 2008 | Charles D. Lavine 65.3% (35,960) | George В. McMenamin 32.2% (17,755) | 33.1pts |
| 2006 | Charles D. Lavine 65.7% (24,160) | Steve J. Gonzalez 34.3% (12,600) | 31.4pts |
| 2004 | Charles D. Lavine 59.2% (33,345) | Phillip L. Sciarillo, Sr. 33.3% (18,734) | 25.9pts |
| 2002 | David S. Sidikman 57.0% (20,362) | Jacqueline M. Biggio 41.8% (14,932) | 15.2pts |
| 2000 | David S. Sidikman 64.7% (30,638) | Neil O. Bergin 33.7% (15,963) | 31.0pts |
| 1998 | David S. Sidikman 59.1% (22,219) | David L. Zatlin 38.5% (14,471) | 20.6pts |
| 1996 | David S. Sidikman 62.9% (28,121) | Jonathan E. Kroll 36.2% (16,208) | 26.7pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-13
Base lean: D+13
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+13). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 13 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.