← All Assembly Members
R
Asm. John K. Mikulin
District 17
Republican
First elected 2017
John K. Mikulin represents AD-17, a Republican-leaning district with a base lean of R+23 and a voter registration breakdown of 38.1% Republican, 29.2% Democrat, and 28.4% Independent; the 2026 outlook rates the seat Safe R across all modeled environments. First elected in 2017, Mikulin has won by increasingly wide margins, taking 65.3% of the vote in 2024 against Harpreet S. Toor by 30.6 points, though his earliest contests were closer — a 12.0-point margin in 2018. The district is a high-income, predominantly suburban area with a median household income of $147,145, a homeownership rate of 92.0%, and a population that is 71.5% white, 15.2% Hispanic, and 11.0% Asian, with a poverty rate of 4.9%. In the 2025 session, Mikulin sponsored 23 bills, with the largest concentration in Penal law (5 bills), followed by Civil Service and Real Property Taxation at 2 bills each, and single bills spanning Criminal Procedure, Domestic Relations, Economic Development, and Education; no committee chairmanship is listed in this brief.AI
Vulnerability Index AD-17
Base lean: R+23
Favorable D
Neutral
Favorable R
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (R+23). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts. Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/1/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
Electoral History AD-17
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | John K. Mikulin 65.3% (45,027) | Harpreet S. Toor 34.7% (23,887) | 30.6pts |
| 2022 | John K. Mikulin 66.1% (34,592) | Paul R. Kaminsky 33.9% (17,703) | 32.2pts |
| 2020 | John K. Mikulin 59.7% (39,681) | Mark A. Engelman 40.3% (26,768) | 19.4pts |
| 2018 | John K. Mikulin 56.0% (26,744) | Kimberly L. Snow 44.0% (21,047) | 12.0pts |
| 2016 | Thomas McKevitt 62.6% (36,147) | Matthew W. Malin 37.4% (21,581) | 25.2pts |
| 2014 | Thomas McKevitt 69.1% (19,912) | Jonathan C. Clarke 30.9% (8,887) | 38.2pts |
| 2012 | Thomas McKevitt 57.4% (27,114) | Kevin C. Brady 42.6% (20,138) | 14.8pts |
| 2010 | Thomas McKevitt 62.2% (24,766) | Thomas J. Devaney 37.8% (15,060) | 24.4pts |
| 2008 | Thomas McKevitt 57.7% (31,803) | John L. Pinto 42.3% (23,321) | 15.4pts |
| 2006 | Thomas McKevitt 53.4% (19,048) | Dolores D. Sedacca 46.6% (16,622) | ⚡ 6.8pts |
| 2004 | Maureen C. O'Connell 61.9% (35,465) | Anthony A. Pellegrino 38.1% (21,859) | 23.8pts |
| 2002 | Maureen C. O'Connell 68.7% (25,965) | Thomas E. Sobczak 27.8% (10,494) | 40.9pts |
| 2000 | Maureen C. O'Connell 60.5% (28,804) | Emil L. Samuels 35.4% (16,829) | 25.1pts |
| 1998 | Maureen C. O'Connell 68.2% (25,124) | Richard V. Mannheimer 28.2% (10,389) | 40.0pts |
| 1996 | Michael А. L. Balboni 67.5% (30,768) | Edward Garcia 29.7% (13,533) | 37.8pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 (Republican) | John K. Mikulin 70.5% (2,604) | James Coll 29.5% (1,090) | 41.0pts |
| 2018 (Reform) | John K. Mikulin 97.2% (205) | James Coll 1.9% (4) | 95.3pts |
Special Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | John K. Mikulin 63.8% (2,143) | Matthew W. Malin 36.2% (1,215) | 27.6pts |
| 2006 | Thomas McKevitt 67.8% (3,561) | Zahid Ali Syed 32.2% (1,691) | 35.6pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Voter Registration
District 17 Profile
Population
129,463
Median income
$147,145
Median rent
$2,581
Homeownership
92.0%
Education (BA+)
45.0%
Poverty rate
4.9%
Uninsured rate
2.9%
Unemployment rate
4.9%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Demographics
White
71.5%
Black
2.6%
Hispanic
15.2%
Asian
11.0%
Median age
43.0
Foreign born
14.9%
Limited English households
2.5%
Veterans
3.1%
Disability rate
10.7%
Commute Mode
Drive alone
68.4%
Public transit
8.5%
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bills sponsored
23
Floor debate appearances
9
Years in office
9
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Joint hearing appearances from NYS Senate hearing transcripts.
Floor Session Activity 2025–2026
A03058-C
2026-03-18
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to promoting consumer choice by requiring manufacturers of digital electronic equipment to provide retail sellers with a one through ten repair score that will be displayed to a consumer at point-of-sale.
The Assembly debated A03058-C, sponsored by Asm. Carroll, which would require manufacturers of digital electronic equipment to display a one-through-ten repairability score at point-of-sale in New York State. The bill would task the Department of State with creating repairability standards and empower the Attorney General to enforce compliance with $500 penalties per violation. Sponsor Carroll cited the European Union's successful implementation of a similar system serving 550 million citizens and argued the requirement would not burden manufacturers or increase costs. Opponent Asm. Mikulin raised concerns about enforcement complexity, whether the single-state requirement would discourage manufacturers from selling in New York, potential price increases for consumers, and confusion from varying standards across states. Carroll countered that consumers are intelligent enough to understand scoring systems and that New York's market of 20 million people would remain attractive to manufacturers. The Minority Conference indicated it would vote against the bill.
A04716-D
2026-03-18
Washing Machine Microfiber Filtration Act
The Assembly debated A04716-D, the Washing Machine Microfiber Filtration Act, sponsored by Assemblywoman Kelles, which would require washing machines sold in New York State after January 1, 2030 to include microfiber filtration systems. Kelles argued that microplastics from washing machines contribute approximately 30 percent of ocean microplastics and have been found in human brains and tissues, causing inflammation and health risks. She noted that filter technology already exists and is used in Europe, with some filters capturing up to 98 percent of microfibers. However, multiple Assembly members raised significant concerns. Assemblyman Mikulin questioned why washing machines are regulated rather than the textile industry and noted that no U.S. states have yet implemented such requirements. Assemblyman Manktelow expressed concern that the bill simply moves microplastics from water systems to landfills, potentially contaminating New York's freshwater resources including Lake Ontario and the Finger Lakes. Assemblyman Lemondes questioned whether alternative disposal methods like incineration were explored and warned the microfibers could eventually be classified as hazardous waste. Assemblyman Bologna raised concerns about consumer compliance with filter maintenance and questioned the actual cost increase to consumers. The bill had not been voted on at the conclusion of this transcript segment.
A08022-A
PASSED
2026-02-09
An act to amend the Criminal Procedure Law, in relation to requiring certain covered platforms to provide a process for law enforcement agencies to contact such platform and to comply with search warrants within 72 hours
A09475 / S08823
PASSED
2026-02-03
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to the definition of the term employer and to the requesting or use for employment purposes of the consumer credit history of an applicant for employment or employee by an employer, labor organization, employment agency or any agent thereof
The Assembly passed A09475, sponsored by Asm. Dinowitz, a chapter amendment to 2025 legislation restricting the use of consumer credit history in employment decisions. The amendment narrows the scope of the original bill by defining "employer" and exempting State employees and positions subject to State agency background investigations. The measure is modeled after New York City law. During debate, Asm. Mikulin expressed concern that the bill creates an unenforceable prohibition, arguing that employers could still obtain credit reports even if prohibited from using them in hiring decisions. The Minority Conference opposed the measure.
A03038-B / S____
PASSED
2025-06-11
Right of Action for Claims Arising Out of Coerced Debts
The Assembly passed A03038-B, sponsored by Asm. Rosenthal, establishing procedures for domestic violence survivors to dispute coerced debts and hold abusers liable. The bill addresses economic abuse, with Rosenthal citing data showing 99 percent of domestic violence survivors experience economic abuse and 52 percent have coerced debt. During debate, Asm. Mikulin raised concerns about creditor investigation burdens, potential false affidavits, and whether mortgages could qualify as coerced debt, potentially exposing lenders to massive losses. Rosenthal responded that creditors would investigate claims and pursue abusers rather than survivors, and that survivors are unlikely to fabricate abuse claims. Mr. Bologna questioned whether debts incurred before abuse began would qualify and whether non-severable contracts would be affected. The Minority Conference opposed the bill while the Majority supported it. Rosenthal explained her affirmative vote, emphasizing that coerced debt traps survivors and prevents them from rebuilding their lives.
A01316 / S03072
2025-05-28
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to prohibiting the disclosure or use of a person's consumer credit history to an employer, labor organization, employment agency or agent thereof for purposes of employment decisions
Debate continued on A01316/S03072, sponsored by Assemblyman Dinowitz, which would prohibit employers from using consumer credit reports in employment decisions. Dinowitz argued that credit reports contain significant inaccuracies—citing approximately 25 percent error rates from prior Assembly hearings—and that no correlation exists between credit history and job performance. Assemblyman Mikulin challenged the bill's enforceability, questioning how violations would be detected if employers can still run credit reports. He also cited existing Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act protections and raised concerns about positions involving financial responsibility. Dinowitz noted the bill includes exceptions for positions required by law to use credit history, police officers, investigative agencies, bonded positions, and positions with access to trade secrets. Debate was ongoing at the end of this transcript segment.
A01035-B
PASSED
2024-06-04
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to prohibiting the use of social media platforms for the purposes of collecting debts
The Assembly passed A01035-B, sponsored by Assemblywoman Bichotte Hermelyn, prohibiting debt collectors and creditors from using social media platforms to collect consumer debts. The bill allows debt collectors to continue using email and text messaging but bars contact through platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. Supporters argued the measure protects vulnerable New Yorkers, particularly seniors, from fraud and phishing scams where bad actors pose as creditors or government agencies to steal personal information. Assemblywoman Lunsford cited family members targeted by such scams. Opponents, led by Assemblyman Goodell, contended the bill is too broad and may conflict with federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act authority. They argued private messages on platforms like Facebook Messenger are legitimate when debtors evade contact by changing phone numbers and addresses. Despite opposition from the Republican Conference, the Democratic Conference supported the measure, and it passed.
A01035-B
PASSED
2024-06-04
An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to prohibiting the use of social media platforms for the purposes of collecting debts
The Assembly passed A01035-B, sponsored by Assemblywoman Bichotte Hermelyn, prohibiting debt collectors and creditors from using social media platforms to collect consumer debt while permitting email and text messaging. The bill aims to protect New Yorkers, particularly seniors and vulnerable populations, from harassment, fraud, and scams on platforms like Facebook and Instagram. Supporters, including Ms. Lunsford and Mrs. Peoples-Stokes, highlighted cases of scammers posing as creditors and the IRS to phish for personal information. Opponents, led by Assemblyman Goodell, argued the bill is too broad and may conflict with federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. They contended that private messages are legitimate when debtors deliberately hide by changing contact information, and that existing protections already prevent harassment. Concerns were also raised about the bill's definition of social media potentially affecting platforms like WhatsApp, which serve as primary communication tools for immigrant communities. The bill passed despite Republican opposition.
A04620
2023-05-16
Availability for sale of advertised merchandise; rain check requirements
The Assembly debated A04620, sponsored by Asm. Alvarez, which would require retailers to offer rain checks for advertised merchandise and enforce longstanding FTC regulations against bait-and-switch advertising. Alvarez argued the bill shifts the burden of proof from consumers to sellers and addresses deceptive practices. Opponents Mikulin and Jensen contended the mandate would discourage retailers from offering sales and impose unreasonable supply chain burdens. Jensen raised detailed concerns about compliance across multiple advertising formats and the requirement for retailers to maintain excess inventory to fulfill rain checks. Alvarez countered that retailers retain discretion over how many items to offer at sale prices versus rain checks, and that the bill addresses genuine deceptive practices. The debate highlighted tension between consumer protection and business flexibility in pricing and inventory management.
Source: Official NY Assembly floor session transcripts (Granicus). AI-processed. Includes sessions from 2023 onward where transcripts are available.
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
bills
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset (JCOPE filings targeting Assembly members).
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.