Asm. Philip Palmesano
Philip Palmesano has represented AD-132, a heavily Republican district with a R+22 registration lean and a base electoral lean of R+27, since first being elected in 2011; he has run uncontested in every general election from 2012 through 2024 and is rated Safe R across all 2026 electoral scenarios. The district is predominantly rural and white (92.0%), with a homeownership rate of 74.5%, a median household income of $67,292, a poverty rate of 13.4%, and a voter registration breakdown of 45.8% Republican, 24.4% Independent, and 23.8% Democrat. In the 2025 session, Palmesano sponsored 81 bills, with his heaviest concentrations in Tax (8 bills), Environmental Conservation (7 bills), Penal (5 bills), and a cluster of four-bill groupings spanning Correction, Education, and Highway law areas.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (16) AI
Credited the Tobia family, whose son died by suicide, with championing the bill; noted rural suicide rates are much higher than in metropolitan areas and the Council will address barriers to care and identify solutions.
Highlighted that New York has 8,000 residents waiting for organ transplants with a 52 percent registration rate versus 64 percent nationally; noted one donor can save up to eight lives and impact 75 others.
Voted affirmatively, expressing gratitude to Chairman Pretlow and staff for their work during budget negotiations, and stating that support for legislative staff funding outweighed his typical practice of voting against budget packages.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition (34) AI
Stated the Republican Conference opposes the bill due to tax increases included in the budget extender, though he acknowledged the technical corrections aspect of the legislation.
Characterized the bill as a political power grab that removes 100+ years of bipartisan practice where both parties agreed on ballot language. Argued the existing system with Board of Elections input and Attorney General review provides appropriate checks, and that the Legislature should not control the sales pitch for its own proposals.
Criticized the bill as a one-size-fits-all approach ignoring regional weather differences and infrastructure conditions. Raised concerns about liability exposure for municipalities, enforcement mechanisms, and the lack of adequate funding for local road infrastructure given only $50 million in CHIPS funding increases.
Expressed concerns about lack of uniform government oversight of practitioners, differences in state regulations (such as prescription authority), and potential liability issues. Questioned how New York would prohibit activities outside its scope of practice when psychologists practice remotely, though acknowledged the compact's merit.
Expressed concerns about lack of uniform government oversight of practitioners, differences in state scope of practice (prescription authority), and unclear recourse for damages, though acknowledged the compact's merit and hoped these issues would be addressed moving forward.
Electoral History AD-132
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (49,589) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (39,869) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (48,854) | Uncontested | — |
| 2018 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (38,269) | Uncontested | — |
| 2016 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (44,758) | Uncontested | — |
| 2014 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (31,261) | Uncontested | — |
| 2012 | Philip A. Palmesano 100.0% (39,580) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Joseph D. Morelle 61.0% (24,640) | Mark S. Scuderi 39.0% (15,772) | 22.0pts |
| 2008 | Joseph D. Morelle 100.0% (41,721) | Uncontested | — |
| 2006 | Joseph D. Morelle 68.5% (29,036) | Samuel R. Trapani 31.5% (13,344) | 37.0pts |
| 2004 | Joseph D. Morelle 100.0% (34,831) | Uncontested | — |
| 2002 | Joseph D. Morelle 67.5% (26,933) | Dean J. Fero 32.5% (12,975) | 35.0pts |
| 2000 | Joseph D. Morelle 69.7% (35,643) | Michael J. Belmont 30.3% (15,480) | 39.4pts |
| 1998 | Joseph D. Morelle 69.8% (29,345) | Dean J. Fero 28.2% (11,835) | 41.6pts |
| 1996 | Joseph D. Morelle 67.3% (35,287) | Richard L. Rampello 31.4% (16,480) | 35.9pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-132
Base lean: R+27
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (R+27). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 132 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.