Asm. Jo Anne Simon
Jo Anne Simon represents AD-52, a heavily Democratic district anchored at D+75 by voter registration (78.6% Democrat, 4.0% Republican), and has held the seat since 2015 with commanding margins — winning 94.1% to 5.9% in 2024 and running uncontested in 2020; the district is rated Safe D across all 2026 electoral scenarios. The district, located in Brooklyn, is characterized by high educational attainment (80.0% bachelor's degree or higher), a median household income of $184,028, a median rent of $3,191, a homeownership rate of 37.9%, and a racial composition of 65.3% white, 11.5% Hispanic, 9.9% Asian, and 8.5% Black. In the 2025 session, Simon sponsored 203 bills, with her heaviest concentration in Education (25 bills), Election law (16 bills), Mental Hygiene (14 bills), and Vehicle and Traffic (13 bills), reflecting a broad legislative portfolio spanning civil liberties, public health, and urban infrastructure. No committee chairmanship data is available in this brief, and no lobbying sector data was provided for this member.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (48) AI
The bill would significantly change New York's incompetency law and criminal procedure framework. Opponents argued it creates multiple problems: it removes judicial discretion in setting bail for competency evaluations, changes the legal standard of competency to require courts to predict whether someone will ever be restored to competency, prevents medical evidence from being used against defendants at trial, and allows judges to unilaterally dismiss cases without prosecution input. Critics noted the District Attorneys Association opposes the bill and raised concerns about moving criminal cases to civil cases without clear mechanisms.
Assemblyman Gandolfo acknowledged improvements from the previous year's vetoed version regarding local school board involvement but argued the language remains too broad and prescriptive, with final appeals going to the state Commissioner rather than preserving local control. Assemblywoman Glick supported the bill, noting organized efforts to remove books from libraries and citing the dangers of book banning historically. Assemblyman Durso similarly expressed concerns about appeals being automatically escalated to Albany rather than remaining with local school boards.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition (2) AI
Acknowledged positive elements including the ASAP bill and utility reform but voted no, stating the rollback to CLCPA is 'a bridge too far' and that weakening methane accounting and environmental regulations will not make energy more affordable. Called for future passage of the SUNNY Act, virtual power plants, data center moratorium, and nuclear moratorium.
Acknowledged positive provisions including the ASAP bill, utility reform, and super speeder measures, but voted against the bill, stating the rollback to the CLCPA was 'a bridge too far' and that weakening methane accounting and environmental regulations would not make energy more affordable. Called for future passage of the SUNNY Act, virtual power plants, data center moratorium, and nuclear moratorium.
Electoral History AD-52
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Jo Anne Simon 94.1% (60,758) | Brett Wynkoop 5.9% (3,785) | 88.2pts |
| 2022 | Jo Anne Simon 92.1% (48,463) | Brett Eugene Wynkoop 7.9% (4,173) | 84.2pts |
| 2020 | Jo Anne Simon 100.0% (67,382) | Uncontested | — |
| 2018 | Jo Anna Simon 95.5% (56,309) | Daniel Ramos 3.4% (1,988) | 92.1pts |
| 2016 | Jo Anne Simon 91.8% (57,578) | Daniel Ramos 8.2% (5,146) | 83.6pts |
| 2014 | Jo Anne Simon 69.7% (18,421) | Peter J. Sikora 22.1% (5,843) | 47.6pts |
| 2012 | Joan L. Millman 92.9% (49,265) | John R. Nijhawan 7.1% (3,747) | 85.8pts |
| 2010 | Joan L. Millman 90.5% (31,441) | John A. Jasilli, Jr. 9.5% (3,292) | 81.0pts |
| 2008 | Joan L. Millman 91.8% (47,704) | Pedro V. Monge 8.2% (4,272) | 83.6pts |
| 2006 | Joan L. Millman 92.5% (30,070) | Rosemarie Markgraf 7.5% (2,438) | 85.0pts |
| 2004 | Joan L. Millman 89.8% (43,311) | Scott J. Santandrea 8.4% (4,053) | 81.4pts |
| 2002 | Joan L. Millman 88.4% (22,033) | Kenn W. Lowy 8.6% (2,132) | 79.8pts |
| 2000 | Joan L. Millman 76.4% (28,535) | Veronica E. Pawson 22.6% (8,420) | 53.8pts |
| 1998 | Joan L. Millman 72.1% (19,259) | Glenn D. Bell 24.5% (6,553) | 47.6pts |
| 1996 | Eileen C. Dugan 70.4% (22,694) | John Johnston 18.5% (5,957) | 51.9pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 (Democratic) | Jo Anne Simon 53.1% (5,882) | Peter J. Sikora 39.7% (4,407) | 13.4pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-52
Base lean: D+83
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+83). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 52 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity 2023
Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records filed with the Ethics Commission — not individual meetings.
Top Lobbying Issues
Top Organizations Lobbying This Member
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. ★ Chair = lobbying issue overlaps with a committee this member chairs. ↔ Overlap = matches committee membership or bill sponsorship focus.