Asm. Michael Tannousis — The Commons Gallery

Michael Tannousis represents AD-64, a Staten Island-based district with a D+3 registration lean (Democrats 35.8%, Republicans 33.1%, Independents 27.2%) that has nonetheless returned Republicans uncontested in 2022 and 2024; his only contested race was in 2020, when he won by 17.0 points, and the district's scenario model places the 2026 outlook at Lean D in a neutral environment and Toss-up under favorable Republican conditions. The district is majority white (64.3%), with Hispanic (16.3%) and Asian (17.1%) populations, a median household income of $94,617, a homeownership rate of 61.1%, and a poverty rate of 10.2%, reflecting a working- and middle-class outer-borough character. In the 2025 session, Tannousis sponsored 44 bills, with his heaviest concentration in Agriculture and Markets (8 bills), followed by Criminal Procedure and Penal law (4 bills each), and additional sponsorship in Education and Vehicle and Traffic (3 bills each). No committee chairmanship is listed in this brief, and no lobbying sector overlap data is provided.AI

Vulnerability Index AD-64

Base lean: D+4

Favorable D

Likely D

Neutral

Lean D

Favorable R

Toss-up

Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
Ran uncontested in most recent election

Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+4). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts. Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/1/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.

Electoral History AD-64

General Elections

Year	Winner	Runner-up	Margin
2024	Michael Tannousis 100.0% (41,352)	Uncontested	—
2022	Michael Tannousis 100.0% (29,567)	Uncontested	—
2020	Michael Tannousis 58.5% (30,630)	Brandon S. Patterson 41.5% (21,697)	17.0pts
2018	Nicole Malliotakis 60.2% (20,893)	Adam Baumel 39.8% (13,838)	20.4pts
2016	Nicole Malliotakis 100.0% (34,533)	Uncontested	—
2014	Nicole Malliotakis 73.4% (15,051)	Marybeth Melendez 26.6% (5,468)	46.8pts
2012	Nicole Malliotakis 61.5% (21,173)	John M. Mancuso 38.5% (13,241)	23.0pts
2010	Sheldon Silver 100.0% (16,881)	Uncontested	—
2008	Sheldon Silver 78.9% (27,639)	Danniel Maio 21.1% (7,392)	57.8pts
2006	Sheldon Silver 86.6% (17,786)	Michael A. Imperiale 13.4% (2,758)	73.2pts
2004	Sheldon Silver 93.7% (26,379)	Carrie Sackett 6.3% (1,770)	87.4pts
2002	Sheldon Silver 92.8% (13,375)	Tara L. Meadows 7.2% (1,040)	85.6pts
2000	Richard N. Gottfried 100.0% (36,647)	Uncontested	—
1998	Richard N. Gottfried 82.7% (24,676)	Dale Е. Mc Cormick 16.0% (4,777)	66.7pts
1996	Richard N. Gottfried 100.0% (31,399)	Uncontested	—

Primary Elections

Year	Winner	Runner-up	Margin
2020 (Republican)	Michael Tannousis 56.4% (3,612)	Marko Kepi 43.6% (2,789)	12.8pts
2018 (Reform)	Nicole Malliotakis 92.2% (248)	Unattributable Write-In 1.9% (5)	90.3pts

Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.

Voter Registration

36%

33%

31%

Dem 35.8% Rep 33.1% Ind/Other 31.1%

District 64 Profile

Population 135,700

Median income $94,617

Median rent $1,797

Homeownership 61.1%

Education (BA+) 38.5%

Poverty rate 10.2%

Uninsured rate 4.5%

Unemployment rate 5.7%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).

Demographics

White 64.3%

Black 3.0%

Hispanic 16.3%

Asian 17.1%

Median age 42.2

Foreign born 32.1%

Limited English households 11.0%

Veterans 2.1%

Disability rate 12.0%

Commute Mode

Drive alone 42.4%

Public transit 29.6%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.

Legislative Activity (2025–2026)

44

13

Years in office 5

Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Joint hearing appearances from NYS Senate hearing transcripts.

Floor Session Activity 2025–2026

A10140 2026-02-11

An act to amend the Cannabis Law, in relation to the location of adult-use retail dispensaries near schools and houses of worship

The Assembly debated A10140, sponsored by Assemblywoman Zinerman, which clarifies how cannabis dispensaries must measure their distance from schools (500 feet) and houses of worship (200 feet) under state law. The bill addresses confusion from the Office of Cannabis Management regarding measurement methodology and aims to allow social equity licensees with established locations to operate without relocation. Debate revealed ongoing concerns about the cannabis law's implementation. Assemblymember Tannousis, who opposed the original legalization, criticized OCM for allowing a cannabis shop to open within 500 feet of a nursery school in his district, arguing OCM failed to recognize the facility as a protected institution. Assemblywoman Zinerman clarified that daycare centers fall under the Office of Children and Families rather than education law definitions used by OCM. Assemblymember Pirozzolo questioned whether the bill's definitions adequately protect preschools and daycare facilities, arguing that if the legislature intended to protect children, such facilities should be explicitly included. Zinerman maintained the bill only clarifies existing measurement rules and does not address definitional issues, which she said are already established in law.

A06468 / S06468 PASSED 2025-06-11

An act to amend Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1973 relating to the transfer of lands to the United States for the establishment of the Gateway National Recreation Area, in relation to the time period in which lands may be conveyed

A00536 PASSED 2025-06-10

Charter revision commission ballot proposals

The Assembly passed a bill sponsored by Asm. Simone allowing multiple charter revision proposals to appear on the same ballot and permitting entities beyond the mayor—including the New York City Council—to submit ballot questions. The bill directly addresses the mayor's 'bumping' power, which allows the mayor to prevent other proposals from appearing on ballots. Simone argued prior mayors have abused this power to suppress City Council proposals, citing a recent example of a proposal to confirm commissioners. Supporters including Asm. Weprin and Asm. Glick contended the bill restores balance of power and checks against executive overreach. Opponents including Asm. Tannousis, Asm. Yeger, and Mr. Lasher argued the bumping power is necessary to prevent chaos from an irresponsible City Council and warned the bill will lead to ballot confusion and litigation similar to California's referendum system. The Republican Conference voted against the bill. Asm. Yeger explained his vote in opposition, urging colleagues to help preserve New York City from chaos.

A00536 PASSED 2025-06-10

Charter revision commission ballot proposals

The Assembly passed a bill sponsored by Asm. Simone allowing multiple charter revision proposals to appear on the same ballot and permitting entities beyond the mayor—including the New York City Council—to submit ballot questions. The bill eliminates the mayor's 'bumping' power, which allows the mayor to prevent other proposals from reaching voters. Simone argued prior mayors have abused this power to block legitimate City Council proposals, citing a recent example of the mayor bumping a proposal to confirm commissioners. Opponents including Asm. Tannousis, Asm. Yeger, and Asm. Lasher contended the bumping provision serves as a necessary check on a potentially irresponsible City Council, prevents ballot confusion, and that eliminating it will lead to litigation and more referenda similar to California's experience. Supporters including Asm. Weprin, Asm. Carroll, and Asm. Glick argued the bill restores democratic balance and prevents executive overreach. The Republican Conference opposed the bill while the Democratic Majority supported it.

A03682 PASSED 2025-05-27

Custodial interrogation of juveniles; requires attorney presence and parental notification

The Assembly passed legislation requiring attorney presence during police interrogation of juveniles, with supporters citing research showing children confess at three times the rate of adults and citing 25 exonerations of juveniles in New York since 1989. Sponsor Asm. Hevesi argued the measure protects constitutional rights and prevents false confessions that allow actual perpetrators to remain free and commit additional crimes. Opponents raised practical concerns about implementation in rural areas lacking designated interrogation facilities and warned the requirement will hamstring law enforcement investigations. The bill received a party-line vote, with the Democratic majority supporting it and Republicans opposing. The measure takes effect April 1, 2026.

A03682 PASSED 2025-05-27

Custodial interrogation of juveniles; requires attorney presence and parental notification

The New York State Assembly passed legislation on May 27 requiring that attorneys be present during police interrogation of juveniles, a measure designed to prevent false confessions and protect constitutional rights of minors. Sponsor Asm. Hevesi cited studies showing children confess at three times the rate of adults and noted that 25 juveniles have been exonerated in New York since 1989. The bill also requires parental notification and mandates that interrogations occur in designated facilities. Opponents, including Asm. Angelino and Ms. Walsh, argued the requirement is logistically impractical outside New York City and will hamstring law enforcement investigations. The Republican Conference voted against the measure, while the Majority Conference supported it. The bill takes effect April 1, 2026.

A01432 2024-06-10

Removing the lifetime ban on jury duty for convicted felons

The New York Assembly debated A01432, sponsored by Speaker Pro Tem Aubry, which would remove the lifetime ban on jury service for individuals convicted of felonies, allowing them to serve once they complete their sentences and all obligations to the state, including parole and probation. Supporters, including Assemblyman Gibbs, argued the measure aligns with recent criminal justice reforms like banning the box and restoring voting rights, and that people who have experienced the criminal justice system bring valuable perspective to jury duty. Opponents, including former prosecutors Tannousis and McGowan, raised concerns that convicted felons may harbor bias against prosecutors or police—particularly if prosecuted by the same office—and that the bill undermines the jury selection process without addressing existing challenge mechanisms. Sponsor Aubry countered that existing voir dire and challenge processes allow attorneys to screen out biased jurors, and that there is no evidence convicted individuals will be systematically biased. The debate highlighted tensions between criminal justice reform and concerns about jury impartiality.

A01432 2024-06-07

Removal of lifetime ban on jury duty for convicted felons

The Assembly debated A01432, sponsored by Speaker Pro Tem Aubry, which would remove the lifetime ban on jury service for individuals convicted of felonies, allowing them to serve once they complete their sentences including parole and probation. The bill drew sharp criticism from former prosecutors Tannousis and McGowan, who argued that convicted felons may harbor bias against prosecutors or police and that the bill lacks safeguards preventing someone from serving on a jury in a case prosecuted by the same office that convicted them. They contended attorneys typically avoid seating jurors with criminal justice experience to preserve impartiality. Aubry countered that the state already allows felons to vote and hold office, and that existing voir dire and challenge processes allow attorneys to screen out biased jurors. Supporter Gibbs argued that once people repay their debt to society, they should enjoy full civic participation, noting recent reforms like ban-the-box and voting rights restoration. The bill received no vote in this segment.

A01432 2024-06-07

Removal of lifetime ban on jury duty for convicted felons

The Assembly debated A01432, sponsored by Speaker Pro Tem Aubry, which would remove the lifetime ban on jury service for individuals convicted of felonies who have completed their sentences, including parole and probation. Supporters, including Assemblyman Gibbs, argued that once individuals have repaid their debt to society, they should enjoy full civic participation rights consistent with recent reforms like voting rights restoration and Clean Slate legislation. Opponents, including former prosecutors Tannousis and McGowan, raised concerns that convicted felons may harbor bias against prosecutors or police departments and that allowing them to serve could compromise jury impartiality. The bill does not restrict which types of cases convicted felons can serve on or prohibit service in cases prosecuted by the office that originally convicted them. No vote tally was announced in this segment of the transcript.

A08994-A PASSED 2024-05-23

An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to requiring wireless communication method service providers disable services to stolen wireless phones

The Assembly passed A08994-A, sponsored by Asm. Paulin and others, requiring wireless service providers to disable services to stolen phones. Assemblymen Tannousis and Slater spoke in support, with Tannousis citing the death of NYPD Detective Simonsen during a robbery as inspiration for the commonsense measure. Slater highlighted the bipartisan coalition involving legislators, law enforcement, and cell phone providers that developed the legislation to reduce phone theft and protect consumers.

A05695 / S5695 PASSED 2023-06-07

An act to amend Chapter 759 of the Laws of 1973 relating to the transfer of lands to the United States for the establishment of the Gateway National Recreation Area, in relation to the time period in which lands may be conveyed

A05697 RECALLED 2023-05-10

Rental housing — prohibition on reporting negative rent payment history to consumer reporting agencies

The Assembly recalled a bill that would prohibit landlords from reporting negative rent payment history to consumer reporting agencies before a final vote tally was recorded. The measure, sponsored by Assemblymember Rosenthal, sparked heated debate between housing advocates and landlord advocates. Supporters argued the bill protects tenants from discriminatory practices and excessive salary requirements that exclude working people from housing. Opponents contended it would force landlords to raise rents to cover increased risk and worsen New York's housing crisis by discouraging investment in rental properties. The bill drew passionate testimony from members on both sides, with supporters citing personal experiences of housing insecurity and opponents warning of disinvestment in residential real estate. Majority Leader Peoples-Stokes moved to recall the bill and lay it aside before the roll call vote was completed, preventing a final tally from being recorded.

A05983 2023-03-31

An act to amend the Judiciary Law, in relation to appointments to the office of associate judge of the court of appeals

The New York State Assembly debated A05983, sponsored by Assemblyman Chuck Lavine, which would allow the Governor to use an existing judicial nomination list to fill a vacancy created when an Associate Judge is promoted to Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals. The bill aims to address a prolonged vacancy on the seven-member court, which currently has only six judges. Supporters, including Lavine and Assemblyman Fred Thiele, argued the measure would ensure a full complement of judges and prevent case backlogs, citing instances where cases have been sent back for reargument due to lack of a majority. However, the bill faced significant opposition from both sides of the aisle. Critics including Assemblywoman Aileen Walsh, Assemblyman Andrew Ra, Assemblyman Keith Brown, and Assemblyman Phil Palmesano raised concerns about fairness to potential applicants not on the existing list, constitutional due process issues, and the appearance of a political deal being struck mid-process. Walsh noted that individuals interested in Associate Judge positions but not the Chief Judge role would be foreclosed from applying, potentially limiting diversity on the court. Ra questioned the timing and suggested an effective date delay would be more appropriate. The debate continued at the time of this transcript segment, with no vote recorded.

Source: Official NY Assembly floor session transcripts (Granicus). AI-processed. Includes sessions from 2023 onward where transcripts are available.

Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026

bills

Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.

Lobbying Activity

No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset (JCOPE filings targeting Assembly members).

Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.