← All Assembly Members
D

Asm. Khaleel Anderson

District 31 Democrat First elected 2019

Khaleel Anderson represents AD-31, a deeply Democratic district in New York City with a D+63 registration lean and a base electoral lean of D+73; he has run uncontested in both 2022 and 2024, and his only contested general election resulted in an 78.6-point margin in 2020, placing him in the Safe D category across all modeled electoral scenarios. The district is majority-minority — 48.3% Black, 22.4% Hispanic, and 13.6% Asian — with a poverty rate of 18.2%, a median household income of $82,200, and a homeownership rate of 52.1%, against a voter registration breakdown of 70.0% Democrat and 6.6% Republican. Anderson has sponsored 56 bills in the 2025 session, with the largest concentrations in Executive law (8 bills), New York City Administrative Code (5 bills), and Public Housing (5 bills), reflecting a legislative focus rooted in local governance, housing, and municipal policy. Top lobbying sectors active in his district context and his Banking law sponsorship activity (2 bills) represent an area worth monitoring for potential overlap with outside influence.AI

Topic Focus AI

Firearm Storage & Gun Violence PreventionA08463A04917-D Affordable Housing & Housing VouchersA03009-C Community Development & Banking EquityA06090 Commuter Van Insurance & Transit Desert EquityA05294 Diwali School Holiday RecognitionA07769 Free School Meals ProgramsA03009-C Public Housing Capital InvestmentA03009-C School Funding & Education AccessA04917-D Victim Compensation & Racial EquityA02105 Youth Opportunity & Educational Support ProgramsA03009-C

Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.

Key Issues AI

Executive 8 bills
New York City Administrative Code 5 bills
Public Housing 5 bills
Vehicle and Traffic 3 bills
Banking 2 bills
Education 2 bills
Environmental Conservation 2 bills
Penal 2 bills

Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.

Legislative Activity (2025–2026)

Bills sponsored 56
Floor debate appearances 26
Years in office 7

Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).

Bill Focus Areas

Executive 8 bills
New York City Administrative Code 5 bills
Public Housing 5 bills
Vehicle and Traffic 3 bills
Banking 2 bills
Education 2 bills
Environmental Conservation 2 bills
Penal 2 bills

Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.

Floor Speeches: In Support (26) AI

A05119-B An act to amend the General Business Law and the State Finance Law, in relation to solid waste removal invoices and directing penalties and fines related to such invoices to be deposited into the Environmental Protection Fund 2026-06-04
A09574 An act to amend the State Finance Law, in relation to a deposit placement program for the Banking Development District Program 2026-06-02 PASSED
A09574 An act to amend the State Finance Law, in relation to a deposit placement program for the Banking Development District Program 2026-06-02 PASSED
A08313-B An act to amend the Public Housing Law, in relation to providing trainings and information to residents regarding resident management corporations 2026-06-01

Assemblyman Anderson explained the bill requires NYCHA to provide information and training to residents about resident management corporations (RMCs), a federally-recognized option under HUD regulations that has existed for decades. He emphasized the bill does not transfer management authority from NYCHA but ensures residents are informed about this option. Anderson noted that currently only one RMC exists in New York City because residents lack awareness. Assemblyman Fitzpatrick questioned the accountability, compensation, liability, and qualifications for RMC board members, and asked about problems or failures in other states. Anderson clarified that RMCs must follow HUD regulations, are accountable to HUD and NYCHA, and that the bill only requires education and technical assistance. He cited a HUD report finding that RMCs in New Jersey performed as well or better than traditional housing authorities in management areas.

A08460 Resident Management Corporations in Public Housing 2026-06-01 PASSED

Bill promotes transparency and resident empowerment by educating public housing residents about federally-authorized RMC options. Includes technical assistance, bonding, insurance, and licensing protections to ensure success and prevent failure.

Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI

No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.

Electoral History

General Elections

Year Winner Runner-up Margin
2024 Khaleel M. Anderson 100.0% (28,127) Uncontested —
2022 Khaleel M. Anderson 100.0% (15,580) Uncontested —
2020 Khaleel Anderson 89.3% (34,014) Joseph A. Cullina 10.7% (4,086) 78.6pts
2018 Michele R. Titus 100.0% (23,301) Uncontested —
2016 Michele R. Titus 100.0% (32,132) Uncontested —
2014 Michele R. Titus 100.0% (10,087) Uncontested —
2012 Michele R. Titus 100.0% (22,634) Uncontested —
2010 Michele R. Titus 100.0% (15,666) Uncontested —
2008 Michele R. Titus 100.0% (26,047) Uncontested —
2006 Michele R. Titus 91.4% (11,072) Michael Duvalle 8.6% (1,037) 82.8pts
2004 Michele R. Titus 97.7% (21,712) Michael Duvalle 2.3% (511) 95.4pts
2002 Michele R. Titus 85.8% (11,550) Marina Rejas 8.2% (1,110) 77.6pts
2000 Pauline Rhodd-Cummings 95.5% (22,451) Michael Duvalle 4.5% (1,049) 91.0pts
1998 Pauline Rhodd-Cummings 83.4% (12,856) Michael Duvalle 10.7% (1,644) 72.7pts
1996 Gregory W. Meeks 87.1% (18,699) Michael Duvalle 12.0% (2,571) 75.1pts

Primary Elections

Year Winner Runner-up Margin
2020 (Democratic) Khaleel Anderson 37.2% (3,565) Richard David 28.9% (2,770) ⚡ 8.3pts

Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.

Vulnerability Index

Base lean: D+73

Favorable D
Safe D
Neutral
Safe D
Favorable R
Safe D
  • Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
  • Ran uncontested in most recent election

Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+73). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/21/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.

District 31 Profile

Population 132,006
Median income $82,200
Median rent $1,608
Homeownership 52.1%
Education (BA+) 21.4%
Poverty rate 18.2%
Uninsured rate 9.0%
Unemployment rate 9.9%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).

Voter Registration

70%
23%
Dem 70.0% Rep 6.6% Ind/Other 23.4%

Demographics

White 6.1%
Black 48.3%
Hispanic 22.4%
Asian 13.6%
Median age 38.0
Foreign born 44.0%
Limited English households 7.0%
Veterans 1.8%
Disability rate 11.5%

Commute Mode

Drive alone 43.0%
Public transit 34.7%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.

Lobbying Activity

Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records filed with the Ethics Commission — not individual meetings.

Top Lobbying Issues

Health – General 1 disclosures
Health – Health Services / HMOs 1 disclosures
Health – Hospitals & Nursing Homes 1 disclosures

Top Organizations Lobbying This Member

32BJ Labor Industry Cooperation Trust Fund 3 disclosures

Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. ★ Chair = lobbying issue overlaps with a committee this member chairs. ↔ Overlap = matches committee membership or bill sponsorship focus.