Asm. Landon C. Dais
Landon C. Dais represents AD-77, a heavily Democratic district with a D+66 registration lean and a base electoral model of D+75, rated Safe D across all 2026 scenario projections; first elected in 2023, Dais won his 2024 general election with 74.4% of the vote against Norman Sobe McGill, a 53.8-point margin — notably lower than the margins the seat's previous holders posted, though the district's Democratic dominance remains firmly intact. AD-77 is a high-density urban Bronx district characterized by a 72.2% Democratic registration share, a 33.1% poverty rate, a median household income of $38,763, a 6.3% homeownership rate, and a racial composition of 38.6% Black and 59.5% Hispanic residents. In the 2025 session Dais sponsored 27 bills, with his heaviest concentration in Executive law (4 bills), Veterans' Service (3 bills), and Cannabis (2 bills), reflecting a legislative focus spanning government administration, military family access, and cannabis regulatory reform. Top lobbying sectors active in his district context and the overlapping policy areas of his sponsorship portfolio — particularly cannabis and public authorities — represent areas of potential outside influence worth monitoring.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (17) AI
Explained that the bill ensures veterans and their families have access to needed resources and makes it easier for veterans to obtain information. He recognized a colleague currently serving in the military while serving constituents.
Emphasized OCM's rigorous age verification and child protection measures exceed those of liquor retailers, and that the bill simply clarifies measurement standards for businesses that followed rules in good faith and invested millions in construction and hiring.
Emphasized the importance of protecting the medical cannabis industry and ensuring patients have access to specialized products not available in adult-use dispensaries, such as medical cannabis lotion for arthritis and chronic pain. Noted the bill streamlines processes and can help lower prices while keeping the industry solvent.
Argued the bill provides smaller parties the same mechanism to expel members as major parties already possess, leveling the playing field and protecting party integrity and values.
Explained his personal experience with poor insulation in his 1901-built home and support for heat pumps, stating the program will help lower energy bills and carbon footprint across districts.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-77
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Landon C. Dais 74.4% (18,104) | Norman Sobe McGill 20.6% (5,020) | 53.8pts |
| 2022 | Latoya B. Joyner 86.4% (11,284) | Tanya Carmichael 13.6% (1,777) | 72.8pts |
| 2020 | Latoya Joyner 89.2% (29,759) | Tanya Carmichael 9.7% (3,227) | 79.5pts |
| 2018 | Latoya Joyner 96.4% (21,859) | Tanya Carmichael 3.1% (714) | 93.3pts |
| 2016 | Latoya Joyner 98.7% (27,986) | Benjamin Eggleston 1.3% (371) | 97.4pts |
| 2014 | Latoya Joyner 95.2% (10,028) | Esperanza R. Reyes Acosta 4.0% (421) | 91.2pts |
| 2012 | Vanessa L. Gibson 97.7% (26,551) | Tanya Carmichael 1.7% (470) | 96.0pts |
| 2010 | Vanessa L. Gibson 96.0% (12,261) | Tanya Carmichael 2.8% (362) | 93.2pts |
| 2008 | Aurelia Greene 96.6% (23,857) | Anthony Curry 3.4% (849) | 93.2pts |
| 2006 | Aurelia Greene 94.9% (10,092) | Kathleen Benjamin Larkins 3.5% (369) | 91.4pts |
| 2004 | Aurelia Greene 92.5% (19,660) | Anthony Curry 7.5% (1,594) | 85.0pts |
| 2002 | Aurelia Greene 93.2% (9,121) | Eloise Henderson 6.1% (598) | 87.1pts |
| 2000 | Aurelia Greene 97.1% (20,208) | Eloise Henderson 2.5% (511) | 94.6pts |
| 1998 | Aurelia Greene 96.5% (12,771) | Fred Brown 2.6% (345) | 93.9pts |
| 1996 | Aurelia Greene 97.1% (17,508) | Anne Klein 2.4% (438) | 94.7pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 (Democratic) | Latoya Joyner 70.2% (2,600) | Sherrise Palomino 15.6% (578) | 54.6pts |
Special Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Landon C. Dais 78.8% (1,143) | Norman Sobe McGill 21.2% (308) | 57.6pts |
| 2009 | Vanessa L. Gibson 74.1% (1,756) | Joel Ray Rivera 20.9% (495) | 53.2pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-77
Base lean: D+75
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+75). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/21/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 77 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.