Asm. Erik Dilan
Erik Dilan has represented AD-54, a heavily Democratic Brooklyn district with a D+66 registration lean, since first being elected in 2015; he ran uncontested in 2024 and has not faced a serious general election challenge in his tenure, with his closest contested race producing a 72.6-point margin in 2022. The district is majority-Hispanic (51.3%), with 26.8% Black residents, a 19.7% poverty rate, a homeownership rate of 26.4%, and a median household income of $70,373, reflecting a dense, low-homeownership urban constituency with 71.9% of registered voters enrolled as Democrats. In the 2025 session, Dilan sponsored 91 bills, with his heaviest concentration in Correction law (31 bills), followed by Executive (9) and Insurance (6), a sponsorship profile consistent with his floor activity on corrections accountability and transparency legislation. The district's top lobbying sectors are not specified in this brief, but Dilan's dominant focus on Correction law across both bill sponsorship and floor engagement represents the most distinctive feature of his legislative identity.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (20) AI
Sponsor explained the bill adds state-level protections by allowing the Commissioner of Health discretion based on recommendations from multiple medical organizations, ensuring coverage continues even if federal policy changes adversely affect New York's 19 million residents.
Assemblywoman Walsh supported the bill requiring annual reporting on the Drug Treatment Court program but expressed concern that it focuses on program funding and staffing rather than effectiveness. She emphasized the Legislature should prioritize learning whether the program reduces recidivism and addresses addiction, not just how much money is spent.
Debate focused on implementation details and policy concerns. DiPietro questioned the 72-hour disclosure timeline for footage and in-vehicle camera requirements. Gandolfo sought clarification on the Correctional Association hotline mechanics, confidentiality protections, and complaint handling procedures. Molitor raised concerns about the statute of limitations extension for incarcerated individuals, arguing it creates two classes of citizens and could incentivize meritless claims filed years after incidents occur when video evidence has been destroyed. Dilan defended the provisions as reasonable accommodations negotiated with the Executive and necessary reforms to recognize the humanity of incarcerated individuals.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-54
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Erik Martin Dilan 100.0% (21,908) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Erik Martin Dilan 86.3% (12,163) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 13.7% (1,932) | 72.6pts |
| 2020 | Erik Martin Dilan 85.8% (29,619) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 9.3% (3,211) | 76.5pts |
| 2018 | Erik Martin Dilan 95.4% (22,659) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 4.6% (1,083) | 90.8pts |
| 2016 | Erik Martin Dilan 95.1% (29,152) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 4.9% (1,513) | 90.2pts |
| 2014 | Erik Martin Dilan 85.8% (7,514) | Kimberly Council 9.8% (859) | 76.0pts |
| 2012 | Rafael L. Espinal, Jr. 96.6% (24,242) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 3.4% (858) | 93.2pts |
| 2011 | Rafael L. Espinal, Jr. 44.7% (2,529) | Jesus Gonzalez 33.5% (1,894) | 11.2pts |
| 2010 | Darryl C. Towns 94.6% (10,820) | Khorshed Chowdhury 5.4% (616) | 89.2pts |
| 2008 | Darryl C. Towns 95.7% (20,532) | Khorshed А. Chowdhury 4.3% (923) | 91.4pts |
| 2006 | Darryl C. Towns 94.2% (8,192) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 5.8% (503) | 88.4pts |
| 2004 | Darryl C. Towns 92.6% (17,139) | Khorshed Chowdhury 7.4% (1,370) | 85.2pts |
| 2002 | Darryl C. Towns 90.9% (8,342) | Khorshed A. Chowdhury 9.1% (833) | 81.8pts |
| 2000 | Darryl C. Towns 94.2% (15,547) | John R. Venturina 5.8% (964) | 88.4pts |
| 1998 | Darryl C. Towns 92.7% (8,874) | John Venturina 5.4% (519) | 87.3pts |
| 1996 | Darryl C. Towns 92.7% (11,456) | Benjamin B. Green 7.3% (906) | 85.4pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 (Democratic) | Erik Martin Dilan 60.0% (1,955) | Kimberly Council 40.0% (1,305) | 20.0pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-54
Base lean: D+75
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+75). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 54 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.