Asm. Eddie Gibbs
Eddie Gibbs represents AD-68, a deep-blue Manhattan district with a D+67 registration lean and a base electoral lean of D+76, rated Safe D across all modeled scenarios; he ran uncontested in 2024 and won his only contested general election in 2022 with an 86.8% to 13.2% margin of 73.6 points. The district is majority-minority and heavily renter-dependent, with a population of 141,870 that is 39.3% Hispanic, 29.5% Black, 25.1% white, and 9.6% Asian, a poverty rate of 29.4%, a homeownership rate of 11.7%, and a median household income of $49,783. First elected in 2021, Gibbs has sponsored 47 bills in the 2025 session, with his legislative focus concentrated heavily in Correction law at 15 bills, followed by Metropolitan Transportation Authority at 4 bills and Education at 3 bills, reflecting a consistent orientation toward criminal justice and transit policy. No committee chairmanship data is present in this brief, and no lobbying sector or committee overlap data was provided for this member.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (19) AI
Stated that all New Yorkers should die with dignity and referenced Robert Brooks in support of the bill.
Argued the bill's premise is simple: once someone has served their time, they should be able to serve on jury duty. Noted this aligns with recent reforms like banning the box and restoring voting rights. Emphasized that jury service is the last check on prosecutors and that people with criminal justice experience understand the jury's importance in determining someone's fate.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-68
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Edward Gibbs 100.0% (34,635) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Edward Gibbs 86.8% (22,187) | Daby Benjamine Carreras 13.2% (3,369) | 73.6pts |
| 2020 | Robert J. Rodriguez 89.9% (41,238) | Daby Benjamine Carreras 10.1% (4,608) | 79.8pts |
| 2018 | Robert J. Rodriguez 93.2% (32,140) | Daby Carreras 6.8% (2,346) | 86.4pts |
| 2016 | Robert J. Rodriguez 90.8% (38,759) | Daby Carreras 9.2% (3,920) | 81.6pts |
| 2014 | Robert J. Rodriguez 91.3% (13,532) | Ted Jones 8.7% (1,292) | 82.6pts |
| 2012 | Robert J. Rodriguez 100.0% (31,543) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Robert J. Rodriguez 89.0% (15,771) | John Ruiz 8.4% (1,491) | 80.6pts |
| 2008 | Adam Clayton Powell 91.7% (30,189) | Norma Soriano 6.4% (2,123) | 85.3pts |
| 2006 | Adam Clayton Powell 90.8% (15,629) | Dean Loren Velasco 9.2% (1,587) | 81.6pts |
| 2004 | Adam Clayton Powell 100.0% (26,407) | Uncontested | — |
| 2002 | Adam Clayton Powell 86.3% (13,020) | Emma J. Jackson 12.2% (1,841) | 74.1pts |
| 2000 | Adam Clayton Powell 93.6% (28,936) | Rose Pascale 6.4% (1,977) | 87.2pts |
| 1998 | Nelson А. Denis 92.2% (17,830) | Henry M. Calderon 6.6% (1,270) | 85.6pts |
| 1996 | Nelson Antonio Denis 80.6% (21,658) | Francisco Diaz, Jr. 14.2% (3,824) | 66.4pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 (Democratic) | Robert J. Rodriguez 56.0% (7,041) | Tamika Mapp 44.0% (5,541) | 12.0pts |
| 2018 (Democratic) | Robert J. Rodriguez 75.0% (10,814) | John Ruiz 25.0% (3,612) | 50.0pts |
Special Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | Francisco Diaz, Jr. 60.1% (5,137) | William Del Toro 33.7% (2,880) | 26.4pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-68
Base lean: D+76
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+76). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/21/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 68 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity 2024
Top Lobbying Issues
Top Organizations Lobbying This Member
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records — not individual meetings.