Asm. Jonathan Jacobson
Jonathan Jacobson has represented AD-104, a D+23 district in New York's Hudson Valley, since first being elected in 2019, and faces no meaningful electoral threat — he ran uncontested in both 2022 and 2024, and his district carries a base lean of D+28, rated Safe D across all modeled scenarios. The district has a median household income of $83,797, a 13.2% poverty rate, and a racially diverse population that is 49.7% white, 27.6% Hispanic, and 18.9% Black, with Democrats holding a 44.8% to 22.2% registration advantage over Republicans and 27.6% of voters registered as Independent. In the 2025 session, Jacobson sponsored 93 bills, with the heaviest concentration in Election law (16 bills), Public Service (13 bills), and Education (7 bills), and his floor activity reflects a particular focus on utility regulation and election law reform. Top lobbying sectors active in his district align with his Public Service and Labor sponsorship areas, and his single joint hearing engagement reflects limited cross-chamber legislative collaboration in the current session.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (50) AI
Explained that the bill requires utilities to provide per-project transparency on capital expenditures driving rate increases, including purpose, need, cost, and ratepayer benefits, posted on the PSC website to address ongoing rate increases.
Removing the judicial candidate exception makes the process more transparent and ensures voters can rely on party endorsements as meaningful indicators of candidate values, since most voters know little about judicial candidates.
Sponsor argued the bill ensures voters know a judicial candidate shares the party's values when they see them on a party line. Noted most voters decide based on party affiliation when they don't know the candidate personally, and the bill prevents candidates from running on every party line without regard to their actual values.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-104
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Jonathan G. Jacobson 100.0% (37,275) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Jonathan G. Jacobson 100.0% (24,411) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Jonathan G. Jacobson 64.4% (30,912) | Andrew Gauzza, IV 35.6% (17,101) | 28.8pts |
| 2018 | Jonathan G. Jacobson 60.1% (21,585) | Scott M. Manley 39.9% (14,348) | 20.2pts |
| 2016 | Frank Skartados 81.0% (27,959) | William C. Banuchi, Sr. 19.0% (6,576) | 62.0pts |
| 2014 | Frank Skartados 60.1% (14,371) | Sakima A. Green-Brown 39.9% (9,533) | 20.2pts |
| 2012 | Frank K. Skartados 67.5% (27,000) | Christine M. Bello 32.5% (12,979) | 35.0pts |
| 2010 | John J. McEneny 62.0% (25,893) | Deborah M. Busch 38.0% (15,850) | 24.0pts |
| 2008 | John J. McEneny 78.9% (43,367) | Terrence В. O'Neill 21.1% (11,563) | 57.8pts |
| 2006 | John J. McEneny 100.0% (36,806) | Uncontested | — |
| 2004 | John J. McEneny 74.5% (40,795) | Joseph A. Sorce 25.5% (13,934) | 49.0pts |
| 2002 | John J. McEneny 74.9% (33,045) | Kerry L. Murphy 21.0% (9,271) | 53.9pts |
| 2000 | John J. McEneny 77.5% (39,967) | Thomas C. Hoey 22.5% (11,619) | 55.0pts |
| 1998 | John J. Mc Eneny 71.6% (31,534) | Lisa Hampton 25.0% (11,006) | 46.6pts |
| 1996 | John J. Mc Eneny 73.0% (37,909) | David А. Schnell 19.8% (10,260) | 53.2pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 (Democratic) | Jonathan G. Jacobson 27.8% (2,320) | Kevindaryan Lujan 22.3% (1,862) | ⚡ 5.5pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-104
Base lean: D+28
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+28). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/21/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 104 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.