Asm. Anna Kelles
Anna Kelles has represented AD-125, a D+28 district anchored by a 48.9% Democratic registration advantage over 20.7% Republican, since first winning election in 2021; she ran uncontested in both 2022 and 2024, and the district is rated Safe D across all modeled electoral environments, consistent with a long history of Democratic dominance in this seat. The district spans a predominantly white (78.1%) population of 134,489 with a median household income of $72,266, a 16.1% poverty rate, and a notably high educational attainment rate of 52.3% with a bachelor's degree or higher, reflecting the Ithaca-area college-town character of the constituency. Kelles sponsored 119 bills in the 2025 session, with Environmental Conservation leading at 19 bills, followed by Education at 11, Tax at 8, Public Health at 7, and Agriculture and Markets at 6, reflecting a legislative identity concentrated on environmental and public health policy. Her floor session activity reinforces this focus, with sponsored legislation addressing microplastics filtration, food chemical disclosure, and open water data, alongside Agriculture and Markets law amendments.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (46) AI
Sponsor explained the bill bans three chemicals already identified as harmful and requires disclosure of safety analyses already conducted under federal standards. Emphasized the disclosure requirement is not duplicative because federal disclosure is voluntary, and noted alternatives to the banned chemicals already exist in the market at comparable costs.
Sponsor argued that microplastics from washing machines contribute significantly to ocean pollution and have been found in human brains and tissues, causing inflammation and health risks. Emphasized that effective filter technology already exists and is used in Europe, and that a 2030 implementation date allows manufacturers time to adapt.
The bill would require washing machines sold in New York to include filters to prevent microplastics from entering wastewater. Supporters argued microplastics are a widespread environmental and health threat found in water, soil, air, and human bodies, and that the technology exists and has been used for two decades. Opponents raised concerns about cost to consumers, citing California Governor Newsom's 2023 veto of similar legislation due to affordability concerns, and questioned why New York should be first when no other state has successfully implemented such a requirement.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition (4) AI
Cryptocurrency mining, particularly proof-of-work mining, is extremely energy-intensive and has significant environmental impacts. The task force lacks members with environmental expertise needed to ensure a balanced report on this rapidly growing, energy-intensive industry.
Opposed the watering down of substantial equivalency provisions and the missed opportunity to expand the earned time program for incarcerated persons, though voted in favor overall.
Expressed deep concerns about watering down of substantial equivalency standards and missed opportunity to expand earned time program for true transformation in the carceral system.
Opposed the watering down of substantial equivalency provisions and lamented the missed opportunity to expand the earned time program for meaningful criminal justice transformation and improved corrections officer safety.
Electoral History AD-125
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Anna Kelles 100.0% (44,304) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Anna Kelles 100.0% (32,321) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Anna Kelles 68.9% (37,673) | Matthew McIntyre 31.1% (17,028) | 37.8pts |
| 2018 | Barbara S. Lifton 100.0% (35,459) | Uncontested | — |
| 2016 | Barbara S. Lifton 69.9% (35,416) | Herbert Masser, Jr. 30.1% (15,264) | 39.8pts |
| 2014 | Barbara S. Lifton 66.8% (21,335) | Herbert Masser, Jr. 33.2% (10,581) | 33.6pts |
| 2012 | Barbara S. Lifton 100.0% (36,896) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Barbara S. Lifton 62.5% (22,410) | Thomas A. Reynolds 37.5% (13,444) | 25.0pts |
| 2008 | Barbara S. Lifton 100.0% (34,768) | Uncontested | — |
| 2006 | Barbara S. Lifton 67.4% (24,066) | Jim R. Rohan 32.6% (11,654) | 34.8pts |
| 2004 | Barbara S. Lifton 100.0% (33,194) | Uncontested | — |
| 2002 | Barbara S. Lifton 57.9% (19,704) | Michael J. Sigler 40.2% (13,708) | 17.7pts |
| 2000 | Martin A. Luster 100.0% (30,764) | Uncontested | — |
| 1998 | Martin А. Luster 63.7% (21,792) | Jeannine А. Kirby 36.3% (12,431) | 27.4pts |
| 1996 | Martin A. Luster 70.1% (29,941) | Wilson V. Kone 29.9% (12,787) | 40.2pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 (Democratic) | Anna Kelles 36.0% (5,509) | Seph Murtagh 21.8% (3,340) | 14.2pts |
| 2002 (Democratic) | Barbara S. Lifton 62.3% (3,880) | Daniel Lowry Lamb 19.1% (1,187) | 43.2pts |
| 1998 (Conservative) | Jeanine Kirby 100.0% (18) | Uncontested | — |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-125
Base lean: D+34
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+34). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 125 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity 2024
Top Lobbying Issues
Top Organizations Lobbying This Member
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records — not individual meetings.