← All Assembly Members
D

Asm. Steven Otis

District 91 Democrat First elected 2013

Steven Otis (D-AD-91) represents a heavily Democratic district rated D+31 by voter registration, where Democrats hold 39,929 registrations (49.0%) against 17.7% Republican, with a substantial 29.3% independent share; the district is characterized by a median household income of $114,059, a 53.6% bachelor's degree attainment rate, and a racially diverse population that is 53.3% white, 31.9% Hispanic, 9.2% Black, and 5.0% Asian. First elected in 2013, Otis won his 2024 contest against Katie Manger by 33.8 points (66.9% to 33.1%), following four uncontested cycles; his district carries a base lean of D+36 and is rated Safe D across all modeled 2026 electoral environments. In the 2025 session, Otis sponsored 49 bills, with his heaviest concentrations in State Technology (5 bills), Environmental Conservation (4 bills), and Education, General Business, and Public Authorities (3 bills each), reflecting a portfolio that spans digital governance, environmental policy, and public infrastructure. He recorded 1 joint hearing engagement during the session.AI

Topic Focus AI

Utility Emergency Response & Storm RestorationA01410A06285 AI Governance & Transparency in GovernmentA08295-DA09430 Automated External Defibrillators in Youth ProgramsA00366-AA02888 Clean Water Infrastructure FundingA08806-CA03000-D School Funding & Foundation AidA08799-DA03003-D Child Online Safety & Data ProtectionA08149 Commercial Lease Mitigation DutiesA02729 Electric Landscaping Equipment TransitionA02657-A Electric Vehicle Charging InfrastructureA00594 Local Essential Services PlanningA07501 Political Advertising Liability StandardsA10402-A Slavery History Education & Reparations CommissionA04282

Topics extracted by AI from floor debate speeches, joint committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.

Key Issues AI

General Business 1 for A10357
Environmental Conservation 1 for A11029
Executive 1 for A7683
State Technology 5 bills
Environmental Conservation 4 bills
Education 3 bills
General Business 3 bills
Public Authorities 3 bills
General Municipal 2 bills
Labor 2 bills
Public Service 2 bills

Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.

Legislative Activity (2025–2026)

Bills sponsored 49
Joint hearing appearances 1
Floor debate appearances 50
Years in office 13

Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).

Bill Focus Areas

State Technology 5 bills
Environmental Conservation 4 bills
Education 3 bills
General Business 3 bills
Public Authorities 3 bills
General Municipal 2 bills
Labor 2 bills
Public Service 2 bills

Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.

Floor Speeches: In Support (50) AI

A11292 An act to amend the General Business Law, in relation to prohibiting the use of stealth crawlers 2026-06-05 PASSED
A10357 New York Health Information Privacy Act — protection of health information and regulated health data 2026-06-04 PASSED

Praised the bill for protecting individuals' right to keep healthcare information private and noted the bill leaves the decision with the individual, which is appropriate in an era where data is widely accessible online.

A10132-B Connected Consumer Product End of Life Disclosure Act 2026-06-02

The bill provides consumer protection by requiring manufacturers to disclose support timelines for internet-connected products, empowering consumers to choose between competing products based on service commitments. The idea originated from Consumer Reports and represents the first such protection in the nation.

A10132-B Connected Consumer Product End of Life Disclosure Act 2026-06-02

Sponsor explained the bill requires manufacturers to disclose support timelines for internet-connected products, empowering consumers to choose between competing products based on manufacturer commitments to security and technical support.

A11328 An act to amend the Public Health Law, in relation to the reportable tick-borne disease of Alpha-gal Syndrome 2026-05-28 PASSED

Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI

No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.

Electoral History

General Elections

Year Winner Runner-up Margin
2024 Steven Otis 66.9% (35,097) Katie Manger 33.1% (17,333) 33.8pts
2022 Steven Otis 100.0% (26,877) Uncontested —
2020 Steven Otis 100.0% (40,821) Uncontested —
2018 Steven Otis 100.0% (30,858) Uncontested —
2016 Steven Otis 100.0% (34,749) Uncontested —
2014 Steven Otis 100.0% (17,161) Uncontested —
2012 Steven Otis 62.7% (25,905) William Villanova 37.3% (15,397) 25.4pts
2010 George S. Latimer 68.0% (21,212) Bill Reed 32.0% (10,005) 36.0pts
2008 George S. Latimer 71.3% (31,886) Rob Biagi 28.7% (12,816) 42.6pts
2006 George S. Latimer 100.0% (21,830) Uncontested —
2004 George S. Latimer 68.9% (28,913) Vincent J. Malfetano 31.1% (13,050) 37.8pts
2002 Ronald C. Tocci 52.8% (15,891) Noam Bramson 45.8% (13,787) ⚡ 7.0pts
2000 Willis H. Stephens, Jr. 100.0% (35,200) Uncontested —
1998 Willis H. Stephens, Jr. 100.0% (24,837) Uncontested —
1996 Willis H. Stephens, Jr. 100.0% (31,718) Uncontested —

Primary Elections

Year Winner Runner-up Margin
2020 (Democratic) Steven Otis 50.4% (5,804) Meg Cameron 49.6% (5,720) ⚡ 0.8pts

Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.

Vulnerability Index

Base lean: D+36

Favorable D
Safe D
Neutral
Safe D
Favorable R
Safe D

Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+36). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 10/21/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.

District 91 Profile

Population 140,759
Median income $114,059
Median rent $2,100
Homeownership 53.7%
Education (BA+) 53.6%
Poverty rate 9.6%
Uninsured rate 7.2%
Unemployment rate 6.0%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).

Voter Registration

49%
18%
33%
Dem 49.0% Rep 17.7% Ind/Other 33.3%

Demographics

White 53.3%
Black 9.2%
Hispanic 31.9%
Asian 5.0%
Median age 41.3
Foreign born 29.8%
Limited English households 8.9%
Veterans 2.8%
Disability rate 10.4%

Commute Mode

Drive alone 47.7%
Public transit 17.7%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.

Lobbying Activity

No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.

Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.