Asm. Rebecca Seawright
Rebecca Seawright (Democrat, AD-76) represents a heavily Democratic Manhattan district rated D+54 by registration, with 64.8% of voters enrolled as Democrats against 10.9% Republican — a high-income, highly educated urban constituency with a median household income of $143,542, an 81.9% bachelor's degree attainment rate, and a median rent of $2,857. Seawright has held the seat since 2015 and ran uncontested in both 2022 and 2024; her most competitive general election was 2020, when she defeated Louis Puliafito by 15.4 points, and the district is rated Safe D across all modeled 2026 scenarios. In the 2025 session, Seawright sponsored 59 bills, with elder law (10 bills) and education (8 bills) representing her two largest areas of legislative focus, followed by general business, labor, and social services at 3 bills each.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (38) AI
Assemblymember Walsh expressed strong support for the bill, noting that financial exploitation of elderly constituents is a serious problem that generates some of the saddest calls to district offices. She stated the bill, which requires the Office for the Aging to develop an awareness campaign on financial exploitation of the elderly, is an important step. She noted the bill passed unanimously last year and expressed hope it will do so again, though she noted there is currently no Senate companion bill.
Honored Francesco's memory and his mother Diana's advocacy; emphasized that no parent should lose a child due to carelessly unsecured firearms.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-76
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Rebecca A. Seawright 100.0% (50,508) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Rebecca A. Seawright 100.0% (38,043) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Rebecca A. Seawright 57.7% (28,461) | Louis Puliafito 42.3% (20,860) | 15.4pts |
| 2018 | Rebecca A. Seawright 96.5% (41,624) | Lou Puliafito 3.5% (1,504) | 93.0pts |
| 2016 | Rebecca A. Seawright 73.1% (40,309) | Jonathan Kostakopoulos 26.9% (14,851) | 46.2pts |
| 2014 | Rebecca A. Seawright 66.9% (15,703) | David Paul Garland 33.1% (7,759) | 33.8pts |
| 2012 | Micah Z. Kellner 74.7% (33,409) | Michael K. Zumbluskas 25.3% (11,320) | 49.4pts |
| 2010 | Peter M. Rivera 90.6% (13,898) | Steven Stern 7.8% (1,194) | 82.8pts |
| 2008 | Peter M. Rivera 92.5% (26,832) | Charles Serrano 7.5% (2,167) | 85.0pts |
| 2006 | Peter M. Rivera 91.8% (12,679) | Steven Stern 8.2% (1,132) | 83.6pts |
| 2004 | Peter M. Rivera 91.3% (23,019) | Dennis J. Fiddler 8.7% (2,195) | 82.6pts |
| 2002 | Peter M. Rivera 95.5% (9,740) | Charles R. Serrano 4.5% (463) | 91.0pts |
| 2000 | Peter M. Rivera 91.4% (19,618) | Charles R. Serrano 8.6% (1,844) | 82.8pts |
| 1998 | Peter M. Rivera 94.9% (13,315) | Charles R. Serrano 3.8% (526) | 91.1pts |
| 1996 | Peter M. Rivera 91.0% (18,229) | Francisco R. Nazario 7.4% (1,474) | 83.6pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 (Independence) | Jonathan Kostakopoulos 75.0% (9) | Sabrina Kraus 8.3% (1) | 66.7pts |
| 2016 (Reform) | Opportunity To Ballot | Opportunity To Ballot | — |
| 2014 (Democratic) | Rebecca A. Seawright 45.6% (3,188) | Gus Christensen 37.4% (2,620) | ⚡ 8.2pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-76
Base lean: D+63
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
- Ran uncontested in most recent election
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+63). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/21/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 76 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.