Asm. Al Taylor
Al Taylor represents AD-71, a D+73 district in which he holds a commanding electoral position — he won his only contested general election in 2024 with 86.9% of the vote, a 73.8-point margin, and ran uncontested in every prior cycle since first winning the seat in 2017; the district's 2026 outlook is rated Safe D across all modeled environments. The district is a high-density urban constituency with a majority-Hispanic population (43.1%) and significant Black representation (27.0%), a 21.6% poverty rate, a 16.7% homeownership rate, and voter registration heavily tilted toward Democrats at 77.8% (65,650 registered) against just 4.4% Republican. In the 2025 session Taylor sponsored 37 bills, with his heaviest focus in Education (4 bills), followed by Election, General Business, and several other areas each drawing 2–3 bills, including Public Health and Criminal Procedure. Top lobbying sectors active in his district context are not specified in this brief, but his floor activity on record includes passed legislation touching Labor Law, Election Law, and Executive Law relating to hazardous materials — areas that overlap with his sponsorship priorities in Election and Executive law categories.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (23) AI
Assemblymember Walsh expressed strong support for the bill, noting that financial exploitation of elderly constituents is a serious problem that generates some of the saddest calls to district offices. She stated the bill, which requires the Office for the Aging to develop an awareness campaign on financial exploitation of the elderly, is an important step. She noted the bill passed unanimously last year and expressed hope it will do so again, though she noted there is currently no Senate companion bill.
Debate focused on the mechanics and safeguards of New York joining the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a bipartisan multistate voter list maintenance organization. Asm. Sempolinski questioned whether the bill allows joining multiple organizations (clarifying it must include ERIC but could include others), how ERIC maintains voter lists (using publicly available data from Social Security and U.S. Post Office), privacy protections for confidential voters, and cost implications. Sponsor Taylor confirmed that ERIC does not remove voters but provides information to the state for verification, that confidential voter information is protected, and that startup costs are $150,000 with annual dues of $25,000. Asm. Sempolinski expressed support given adequate protections for privacy and bipartisanship.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-71
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Al Taylor 86.9% (37,267) | Joziel Andujar 13.1% (5,621) | 73.8pts |
| 2022 | Alfred E. Taylor 100.0% (26,081) | Uncontested | — |
| 2020 | Alfred E. Taylor 100.0% (48,538) | Uncontested | — |
| 2018 | Alfred E. Taylor 100.0% (38,898) | Uncontested | — |
| 2017 | Alfred Taylor 100.0% (17,826) | Uncontested | — |
| 2016 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 92.5% (43,183) | Vanessa Stanback 7.5% (3,516) | 85.0pts |
| 2014 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 93.5% (16,174) | Jerome Johnson 6.5% (1,131) | 87.0pts |
| 2012 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 100.0% (36,220) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 90.6% (19,627) | Glenda Allen 9.4% (2,032) | 81.2pts |
| 2008 | Herman D. Farrell Jr. 92.7% (33,830) | Kenneth M. Britton 7.3% (2,647) | 85.4pts |
| 2006 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 93.2% (18,826) | Glenda Allen 6.8% (1,378) | 86.4pts |
| 2004 | Herman D. Farrell 90.5% (29,362) | Faron Henry 7.2% (2,336) | 83.3pts |
| 2002 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 87.6% (14,139) | Edward M. Daniels 12.4% (2,009) | 75.2pts |
| 2000 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 90.8% (28,618) | Charlette Jordan 7.9% (2,483) | 82.9pts |
| 1998 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr 89.7% (18,275) | Alphonzo Mosley, Sr. 8.5% (1,741) | 81.2pts |
| 1996 | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 90.2% (23,231) | Van Stone 9.8% (2,516) | 80.4pts |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 (Democratic) | Alfred E. Taylor 77.2% (13,123) | Guillermo A. Perez 22.8% (3,883) | 54.4pts |
| 2018 (Democratic) | Alfred E. Taylor 47.7% (9,846) | Luis Tejada 33.9% (6,991) | 13.8pts |
| 2014 (Democratic) | Herman D. Farrell, Jr. 71.3% (5,551) | Kelley S. Boyd 28.7% (2,237) | 42.6pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-71
Base lean: D+81
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+81). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 71 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.