← All Assembly Members
D

Asm. Carrie Woerner

District 113 Democrat First elected 2015

Carrie Woerner (D-AD-113) represents a Republican-leaning district carrying an R+3 partisan lean, with Republicans holding a registration edge of 33,545 (33.8%) to Democrats' 30,761 (31.0%) and Independents comprising 29.0% of registered voters. She has won six consecutive general elections since first being elected in 2015, though her margins have tightened in recent cycles — 9.8 points in 2024 and 6.0 points in 2022 — and her 2026 vulnerability model places the seat as a toss-up in a favorable Republican environment. The district is predominantly white (90.1%), largely homeowning (64.8%), and suburban-rural in character, with a median household income of $89,388 and 41.8% of residents holding a bachelor's degree or higher. In the 2025 session Woerner sponsored 212 bills, with Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding law as her dominant focus at 44 bills — more than double her next largest category of Education at 17 bills — followed by Tax (12), Executive (10), and Public Health (8); the gambling and wagering sector's prominence in her sponsorship record represents a notable intersection with her legislative activity.AI

Topic Focus AI

Problem Gambling Prevention & Treatment Workplace Assault Prevention in Healthcare Dental Workforce Development & Access Election Law & Gender-Neutral Language Farm Worker Labor Protections Historic Preservation Tax Credits for Affordable Housing Organ & Tissue Donation School Bus Financing & Asset Management Small Business Climate Policy Compliance

Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.

Key Issues AI

Education 3 for A10565
Education 2 for A5302
Real Property Tax 1 for A355
Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding 44 bills
Education 17 bills
Tax 12 bills
Executive 10 bills
Public Health 8 bills
Environmental Conservation 7 bills
General Municipal 7 bills
Vehicle and Traffic 6 bills

Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.

Legislative Activity (2025–2026)

Bills sponsored 212
Joint hearing appearances 1
Floor debate appearances 50
Years in office 11

Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).

Bill Focus Areas

Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding 44 bills
Education 17 bills
Tax 12 bills
Executive 10 bills
Public Health 8 bills
Environmental Conservation 7 bills
General Municipal 7 bills
Vehicle and Traffic 6 bills

Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.

Floor Speeches: In Support (50) AI

A09584-A An act to amend the Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, in relation to enhancing Know Your Customer requirements and responsible gaming procedures 2026-03-25 PASSED

Bill codifies existing industry practices and establishes evidence-based risk profiling to identify players transitioning from entertainment gambling to compulsive play, laying groundwork for stronger regulations targeting game design itself.

A00382-A An act to amend the Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, in relation to advertising restrictions for mobile sports wagering licensees 2026-03-25 PASSED

Emphasized that the New York HOPES helpline connects callers to New York providers in crisis situations, whereas the national hotline may not, making the state-specific requirement essential for effective help.

A08518 An act to amend the Insurance Law, in relation to requiring insurance coverage of outpatient problem gambling services 2026-03-25 PASSED

Explained her affirmative vote by noting that those calling the NYHOPES hotline are connected to services funded by mobile gaming revenue through the state budget.

A09113-B An act to amend the Racing, Pari-Mutuel Wagering and Breeding Law, in relation to permitting requests for self-exclusion from gambling to be made electronically 2026-03-24 PASSED

Explained that modernizing the self-exclusion process from paper-based to online will make it more accessible to people experiencing problem gambling while maintaining protections to ensure only the individual self-excludes, not family members or others.

A06285 Mobile Sports Betting Monthly Invoice Bill 2026-03-24 PASSED

Expert testimony from a hearing on problem gambling confirmed that providing information about wagering amounts, winnings, and losses is a real tool to help change behavior. The bill provides a specific mechanism to help struggling individuals recognize their problem and modify their own behavior.

Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI

No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.

Electoral History

General Elections

Year Winner Runner-up Margin
2024 Carrie Woerner 54.9% (38,348) Jeremy Messina 45.1% (31,540) 9.8pts
2022 Carrie Woerner 53.0% (29,233) David Catalfamo 47.0% (25,874) 6.0pts
2020 Carrie Woerner 55.1% (40,173) David M. Catalfamo 44.9% (32,726) 10.2pts
2018 Carrie Woerner 56.8% (30,342) Morgan Zegers 43.2% (23,045) 13.6pts
2016 Carrie Woerner 56.4% (33,630) Christopher H. Boyark 43.6% (26,012) 12.8pts
2014 Carrie Woerner 52.4% (19,518) Steve Stallmer 47.6% (17,737) 4.8pts
2012 Tony Jordan 52.8% (28,633) Carrie Woerner 47.2% (25,600) 5.6pts
2010 Teresa R. Sayward 100.0% (36,435) Uncontested
2008 Teresa R. Sayward 100.0% (38,675) Uncontested
2006 Teresa R. Sayward 100.0% (33,787) Uncontested
2004 Teresa R. Sayward 66.7% (38,391) Dennis J. Tarantino 33.3% (19,193) 33.4pts
2002 Teresa R. Sayward 52.3% (21,464) Thomas R. Scozzafava 23.5% (9,636) 28.8pts
2000 Marc W. Butler 100.0% (34,210) Uncontested
1998 Marc W. Butler 100.0% (28,941) Uncontested
1996 Marc W. Butler 100.0% (31,409) Uncontested
1995 Marc W. Butler 60.2% (19,479) Mark R. Rose 39.8% (12,904) 20.4pts

Primary Elections

Year Winner Runner-up Margin
2016 (Republican) Christopher H. Boyark 61.9% (1,594) Gerard Moser 38.1% (981) 23.8pts
2002 (Republican) Teresa R. Sayward 41.8% (5,287) Thomas R. Scozzafava 38.5% (4,864) 3.3pts
2002 (Democratic) Gerald H. Morrow 57.9% (1,434) Preston L. Jenkins, Jr. 42.1% (1,042) 15.8pts

Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.

Vulnerability Index

Base lean: D+3

Favorable D
Likely D
Neutral
Lean D
Favorable R
Toss-up

Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+3). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.

District 113 Profile

Population 138,523
Median income $89,388
Median rent $1,247
Homeownership 64.8%
Education (BA+) 41.8%
Poverty rate 9.2%
Uninsured rate 3.4%
Unemployment rate 3.4%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).

Voter Registration

31%
34%
35%
Dem 31.0% Rep 33.8% Ind/Other 35.2%

Demographics

White 90.1%
Black 1.7%
Hispanic 3.7%
Asian 1.5%
Median age 42.7
Foreign born 3.9%
Limited English households 0.7%
Veterans 7.3%
Disability rate 13.3%

Commute Mode

Drive alone 73.6%
Public transit 0.6%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.

Lobbying Activity

Top Lobbying Issues

Consumer Issues/Safety/Protection 1 disclosures

Top Organizations Lobbying This Member

AAA NEW YORK STATE, INC. 1 disclosures

Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records — not individual meetings.