Asm. Jordan Wright
Jordan Wright represents AD-70, a heavily Democratic Manhattan district where he won his 2024 general election with 91.2% of the vote against Seson Adams, a margin of 82.4 points; the district carries a D+75 registration lean and is rated Safe D across all modeled 2026 electoral scenarios. AD-70 is a majority-Black (47.0%), urban, high-density district with 78.6% Democratic voter registration, a 25.3% poverty rate, 16.2% homeownership, and a median household income of $57,360. First elected in 2025, Wright has sponsored 23 bills in his first session, with the largest concentrations in Executive law (4 bills), Education (2 bills), and Environmental Conservation (2 bills), and has recorded 1 joint hearing engagement. The district's top lobbying sectors are not specified in available data, and no committee chairmanship is indicated in this brief.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing transcripts and floor debate. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues AI
Key issue areas derived from floor debate speeches and sponsored bill law sections.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Bill sponsorship from NYS Open Legislation API. Hearing appearances from joint Senate-Assembly committee transcripts. Floor debate from official Assembly session transcripts (Granicus, 2023–present).
Bill Focus Areas 2025–2026
Grouped by law section from sponsored Assembly bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation API.
Floor Speeches: In Support (45) AI
Sponsor explained the bill removes a 1947-era prohibition on mobile barbershops, updating outdated language that referred to itinerant barbershops as "evil." He stated mobile shops would be held to identical standards as brick-and-mortar shops regarding qualifications, running water, cleanliness, and towel standards, with Department of State oversight.
Wright emphasized the dangers of Legionnaire's Disease outbreaks, citing a Harlem outbreak with six fatalities, and urged passage to protect all communities from this threat.
Assemblymember Walsh expressed strong support for the bill, noting that financial exploitation of elderly constituents is a serious problem that generates some of the saddest calls to district offices. She stated the bill, which requires the Office for the Aging to develop an awareness campaign on financial exploitation of the elderly, is an important step. She noted the bill passed unanimously last year and expressed hope it will do so again, though she noted there is currently no Senate companion bill.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition AI
No recorded floor speeches in opposition found in our transcript archive for this member.
Electoral History AD-70
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Jordan J.G. Wright 91.2% (41,529) | Seson Adams 8.8% (3,989) | 82.4pts |
| 2022 | Inez E. Dickens 92.8% (27,501) | Cynthia Nelson-Acevedo 7.2% (2,124) | 85.6pts |
| 2020 | Inez E. Dickens 90.5% (47,079) | Craig Schley 9.5% (4,969) | 81.0pts |
| 2018 | Inez E. Dickens 100.0% (40,447) | Uncontested | — |
| 2016 | Inez E. Dickens 92.9% (45,048) | Heather Tarrant 7.1% (3,449) | 85.8pts |
| 2014 | Keith L. T. Wright 96.3% (18,161) | Noni Moore 3.7% (700) | 92.6pts |
| 2012 | Keith L. T. Wright 100.0% (40,352) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Keith L. T. Wright 96.0% (22,001) | Dexter Davis 4.0% (924) | 92.0pts |
| 2008 | Keith L. T. Wright 97.2% (37,154) | Rueben D. Riley Sr. 2.8% (1,076) | 94.4pts |
| 2006 | Keith LT Wright 100.0% (19,633) | Uncontested | — |
| 2004 | Keith L. T. Wright 96.4% (30,605) | Edward M. Daniels 3.6% (1,143) | 92.8pts |
| 2002 | Keith L. T. Wright 93.7% (16,261) | Keisha C. Morrissey 6.3% (1,100) | 87.4pts |
| 2000 | Keith L. T. Wright 100.0% (31,359) | Uncontested | — |
| 1998 | Keith L. T. Wright 98.0% (20,757) | Edison C. Horsford 2.0% (423) | 96.0pts |
| 1996 | Keith Lt Wright 98.0% (26,488) | Troy Johnson 2.0% (545) | 96.0pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts. District history reflects 2022 redistricted boundaries.
Vulnerability Index AD-70
Base lean: D+83
- Limited contested election data — registration lean used as primary signal
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+83). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 15+ pts, Likely = 8–14 pts, Lean = 3–7 pts, Toss-up = within 2 pts (Assembly districts are smaller and more homogeneous than Senate districts, so tighter thresholds are used). Generic ballot from Silver Bulletin (Nate Silver), as of 5/20/2026. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
District 70 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024).
Voter Registration
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Lobbying Activity
No lobbying disclosures on record for this member in the available dataset.
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov.