← All Bills

A136

An act to amend the Public Health Law — 2025-06-09 · Calendar #1674

Assembly Bill 136, sponsored by Assemblymember Paulin and assigned Calendar Number 1674, was laid aside during Senate floor consideration. The measure, which would amend the Public Health Law, did not proceed to a vote. Sen. Lanza requested the procedural action to set the bill aside.

Debate Summary

The bill was laid aside without debate or vote.


An act to amend the Public Health Law - Medical Aid in Dying — 2025-06-09 · Calendar #1674

The New York State Senate passed landmark medical aid in dying legislation Tuesday, allowing terminally ill patients with a six-month prognosis to self-administer life-ending medication under physician supervision. The bill, Assembly Bill 136, passed 35-27 after two hours of contentious debate that exposed deep divisions over end-of-life autonomy, patient protections, and safeguards for vulnerable populations. Sponsor Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal argued the measure provides compassionate options for suffering patients and follows successful models in 11 other states with no documented cases of abuse over 27 years. Opponents, led by Sen. Daphne Borrello, raised concerns about insufficient mental health evaluations, lack of mandatory in-person physician visits, inadequate oversight of lethal medications, and potential for coercion of elderly and disabled patients. The bill requires two physician evaluations, written and oral requests, witness attestations, and reporting to the state health department. Supporters emphasized the measure is about personal autonomy and dignity at end of life, while critics argued the Legislature failed to establish adequate safeguards before authorizing what they called state-sanctioned suicide. The bill now goes to Gov. Kathy Hochul for her signature.
PASSED Ayes: 35 · Nays: 27

Debate Summary

The Senate engaged in extensive debate on medical aid in dying legislation. Supporters argued the bill provides compassionate end-of-life options for terminally ill patients with adequate safeguards including physician evaluations, witness requirements, and reporting mechanisms. Opponents raised concerns about insufficient mental health evaluations, lack of in-person physician requirements, inadequate protections for vulnerable populations including people with disabilities, potential for coercion, and the absence of mandatory waiting periods. Debate centered on the definition of terminal illness, physician oversight, chain of custody for medications, and comparisons to medical aid in dying laws in other states.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Comrie aye Democrat
Fahy aye Democrat
Gonzalez aye Democrat
Gounardes aye Democrat
Harckham aye Democrat
Hoylman-Sigal aye Democrat
May aye Democrat
Mayer aye Democrat
Rivera aye Democrat
Scarcella-Spanton aye Democrat
Ashby nay Republican
Baskin nay Democrat
Borrello nay Republican
Bynoe nay Democrat
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Chan nay Republican
Cleare nay Democrat
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martinez nay Democrat
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Persaud nay Democrat
Rhoads nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Sutton nay Democrat
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican