A3000D
Budget Bill - An act making appropriations for the support of government — 2025-05-08 · Calendar #969
Debate Summary
Extensive debate centered on a controversial $10 million appropriation for attorney fees for state employees and elected officials facing investigations or prosecutions. Opponents argued the fund would use taxpayer dollars to defend officials against crimes unrelated to their official duties, with minimal safeguards. Supporters contended it was necessary to protect state officials from politically motivated federal investigations, noting that existing Public Officers Law already covers official acts and that convicted individuals must repay funds. The provision was not included in the Governor's initial budget proposal, 30-day amendments, or one-house resolution, but was introduced by the Executive during final budget negotiations.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Gounardes | aye | Democrat |
| Myrie | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Chan | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |