Budget Bill - An act making appropriations for the support of government —
2025-05-08
· Calendar #969
The New York State Senate passed a controversial $255 billion state budget on Friday evening that includes a $10 million appropriation for attorney fees for state employees and elected officials facing investigations or prosecutions, with the measure passing 40-22 along largely party lines. The provision, which was not included in Governor Hochul's original budget proposal or 30-day amendments but was introduced by the Executive during final negotiations, would allow state officials to use taxpayer funds to hire private attorneys to defend against investigations by federal agencies—even for alleged crimes unrelated to their official duties. The measure sparked intense debate, with Republican senators and some Democrats expressing alarm that it represents an unprecedented use of public funds to defend officials against personal criminal charges. Sen. Andrew Lanza conducted extensive questioning revealing the fund could cover investigations by the FBI, U.S. Attorney's Office, and other federal agencies, and that safeguards preventing payment even after conviction are unclear. Sen. Mike Walczyk questioned whether the provision violates the state Constitution's prohibition on lending state money to private undertakings. Supporters, including Sen. Liz Krueger and Deputy Majority Leader Michael Gianaris, argued the fund is necessary to protect state officials from politically motivated federal investigations and noted that existing law already requires repayment if individuals are convicted. The budget also includes $50 million for food security, $8 million in baby benefits, $3 billion for MTA modernization, and the largest Environmental Protection Fund investment in state history. The Senate adjourned after passing the budget 40 days late.
Passed Senate
Ayes: 40
· Nays: 22
Debate Summary
Extensive debate centered on a controversial $10 million appropriation for attorney fees for state employees and elected officials facing investigations or prosecutions. Opponents argued the fund would use taxpayer dollars to defend officials against crimes unrelated to their official duties, with minimal safeguards. Supporters contended it was necessary to protect state officials from politically motivated federal investigations, noting that existing Public Officers Law already covers official acts and that convicted individuals must repay funds. The provision was not included in the Governor's initial budget proposal, 30-day amendments, or one-house resolution, but was introduced by the Executive during final budget negotiations.
Transcript Mentions
These votes were extracted from the floor transcript by AI. NYS Senate roll calls are read in full, but AI extraction may not capture every senator — so this list is incomplete and skews toward named dissenting votes. Use the Official API Data table above for the complete roll call.
| Senator |
Vote |
Party |
| Gounardes |
aye
|
Democrat |
| Myrie |
aye
|
Democrat |
| Ashby |
nay
|
Republican |
| Borrello |
nay
|
Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick |
nay
|
Republican |
| Chan |
nay
|
Republican |
| Gallivan |
nay
|
Republican |
| Griffo |
nay
|
Republican |
| Helming |
nay
|
Republican |
| Lanza |
nay
|
Republican |
| Martins |
nay
|
Republican |
| Mattera |
nay
|
Republican |
| Murray |
nay
|
Republican |
| O'Mara |
nay
|
Republican |
| Oberacker |
nay
|
Republican |
| Ortt |
nay
|
Republican |
| Palumbo |
nay
|
Republican |
| Rhoads |
nay
|
Republican |
| Rolison |
nay
|
Republican |
| Stec |
nay
|
Republican |
| Tedisco |
nay
|
Republican |
| Walczyk |
nay
|
Republican |
| Weber |
nay
|
Republican |
| Weik |
nay
|
Republican |