← All Bills

A4282B

An act to amend the Town Law — 2023-06-09 · Calendar #1802

Assembly Bill 4282B, an act to amend the Town Law, was laid aside during Senate floor consideration and did not proceed to a vote. The measure was sponsored by Assemblymember Paulin.

Debate Summary

Bill was laid aside by Sen. Lanza and did not proceed to a vote.


An act to amend the Town Law (local elections to even-numbered years) — 2023-06-09 · Calendar #1802

The New York State Senate passed legislation requiring town and county elections outside New York City to be held in even-numbered years, advancing a decade-old proposal to boost voter participation in local races. Assembly Bill 4282B passed 39-23, with all opposition votes coming from Republicans and a handful of Democrats. Sponsor Sen. Skoufis argued the bill will dramatically increase voter turnout in local elections by aligning them with higher-turnout presidential and gubernatorial cycles, citing data showing turnout increases from 8% to 45% in El Paso, Texas and from 4,661 to 11,061 voters in North Las Vegas. However, opponents argued the bill is politically motivated to benefit Democrats, lacks support from local government associations and county officials, and would drown out local candidates' messages with federal politics. Sen. Martins contended the bill imposes Albany's will on communities without consent and doesn't address the real voter apathy problem, which exists in cities rather than suburban counties. The bill carves out certain constitutional offices including sheriffs, district attorneys, and judges, which will continue to be elected in odd years. An amendment by Sen. Weik to exempt New York City was ruled non-germane and defeated. The debate highlighted partisan divisions over election timing and concerns about local autonomy versus voter participation.
Passed Senate Ayes: 39 · Nays: 23

Debate Summary

The bill requires town and county elections outside New York City to be held in even-numbered years to increase voter turnout. Extensive debate centered on whether consolidating local elections with federal and state elections would increase turnout or create voter confusion. Supporters cited data from Nevada and Texas showing dramatic turnout increases when local races align with presidential cycles. Opponents argued the bill is politically motivated to benefit Democrats, lacks local government support, and would drown out local candidates' messages with federal politics. Constitutional carve-outs for certain offices mean odd-year elections would continue for sheriffs, district attorneys, and judges.

Recorded Votes

Individual vote records shown here are captured from roll call mentions in floor transcripts. Because most bills pass with unanimous or near-unanimous ayes, only dissenting (nay) votes are typically read into the record — so the table below skews toward no votes. The full tally (ayes/nays above) reflects the official count.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Breslin nay
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Mayer nay Democrat
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican

Amendments

Sponsor Description Outcome
Sen. Weik Amendment to carve out New York City local elections from the requirement to hold elections in even-numbered years, citing constitutional requirements and local concerns about separating local issues from state and national issues. defeated