A7691
An act to acknowledge the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality and inhumanity of slavery in the City of New York and establish the New York State Community Commission on Reparations Remedies — 2023-06-08 · Calendar #1731
The New York State Senate passed landmark legislation establishing a commission to examine slavery's role in New York State and recommend reparations, marking a historic step in addressing the state's complicity in the slave trade. The bill passed 41-21 largely along party lines, with Sen. Sanders as the primary sponsor. The commission will examine how federal, state, and local governments contributed to slavery and its legacy, and will recommend appropriate remedies and reparations within one year of its first meeting. Supporters emphasized that New York profited significantly from slavery through banking, shipping, and companies like Domino Sugar, and that the state remains one of the most segregated and unequal in the nation. Sen. Brisport noted that for every $100 in accumulated white family wealth, Black families hold just $5.04, a wealth gap directly resulting from generations of stolen opportunity. Sen. Jackson called the bill a crucial step toward acknowledging grave injustices and examining their present-day impacts. However, Sen. O'Mara raised procedural concerns, including the lack of minority party representation on the commission and the absence of requirements to consider the state's fiscal ability to pay or to exclude those without involvement in slavery from bearing costs. Sen. Sanders responded that the Legislature will retain authority over any resulting legislation and will not be bound by the commission's recommendations. The bill takes effect immediately.
PASSED
Ayes: 41
· Nays: 21
Debate Summary
The bill establishes a commission to examine slavery's role and legacy in New York State and recommend appropriate remedies and reparations. Supporters emphasized New York's significant role in the slave trade and the lasting economic disparities stemming from slavery, Jim Crow laws, and systemic racism. Opponents raised procedural concerns about the commission's composition, lack of minority party representation, and the absence of requirements to consider fiscal feasibility or exclude those without involvement in slavery from bearing costs.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |