← All Bills

A983

An act to amend the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law — 2023-02-08 · Calendar #100

The Senate laid aside Calendar Number 100 (Assembly Print 983), legislation to amend the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law sponsored by Assemblymember Magnarelli. Sen. Lanza moved to lay the bill aside, and Acting President Cooney granted the motion, removing the measure from consideration.

Debate Summary

No debate or vote was recorded. Sen. Lanza moved to lay the bill aside, and the motion was granted by the Acting President.


An act to amend the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law — 2023-02-08 · Calendar #100

The Senate passed an amended version of the Tenant Dignity and Safe Housing Act on a 44-18 vote, with 18 Republicans voting against the measure. The bill, sponsored by Sen. May, modifies last year's tenant protection legislation by exempting New York City from its provisions. The amendment sparked sharp debate over whether the exclusion was justified or politically motivated. Sen. Borrello argued that conditions had not changed since the original bill's passage and accused the Majority of protecting property owners who support certain candidates. He also raised concerns about the bill's vague language allowing courts to award "any other relief that the court may deem just," questioning whether this could include monetary damages and attorney's fees. Sen. May countered that New York City already has similar protections and resources in place, making the bill's provisions duplicative for the city. She emphasized that the bill creates a simpler process for tenants to seek court remedies for unsafe housing conditions, fulfilling landlords' legal obligations to provide safe housing. The bill was initially debated on the controversial calendar before being restored to the noncontroversial calendar by agreement between the Majority and Minority.
PASSED Ayes: 44 · Nays: 18

Debate Summary

The bill, sponsored by Sen. May, amends the Tenant Dignity and Safe Housing Act passed last year by carving out New York City from its provisions. Sen. Borrello questioned why the exemption was necessary, noting that conditions had not changed since the original bill's passage and suggesting the exclusion was politically motivated to protect property owners who support certain candidates. Sen. May argued that New York City already has similar protections in place and the resources to help tenants access remedies, making the bill's provisions duplicative for the city. The debate centered on whether courts could award monetary damages under the bill's "any other relief that the court may deem just" language, with May asserting monetary damages were explicitly excluded but courts could impose fines or hold landlords in contempt.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican