S1748
An act to amend the Banking Law — 2024-03-28 · Calendar #123
The Senate passed legislation amending the Banking Law on a 44-15 vote, with 15 Republicans voting against the measure. Sponsor Sen. Sanders defended the bill against questions about whether federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regulations already address the same issues. Sanders argued that state law is necessary because judges look to statutory law rather than regulations, and the state Department of Financial Services requires legislative authority to enforce banking protections. Sen. Weber questioned the need for state action given existing federal oversight. The bill, which takes effect 90 days after becoming law, was moved to the noncontroversial calendar before the roll call vote.
PASSED
Ayes: 44
· Nays: 15
Debate Summary
Sen. Weber questioned whether federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regulations already cover the bill's provisions, suggesting state action may be redundant. Sen. Sanders responded that while federal regulations exist, state laws are necessary because judges look to laws rather than regulations, and the Department of Financial Services needs state law authority to enforce banking protections effectively.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |
An act to amend the Banking Law — 2023-03-21 · Calendar #421
The New York State Senate passed S1748, a bill to amend the Banking Law, on a 46-16 vote. Sponsored by Sen. Sanders, the measure was approved without recorded debate. The bill includes a 90-day effective date upon becoming law. Sixteen senators voted in opposition: Borrello, Gallivan, Griffo, Helming, Mattera, Murray, Oberacker, O'Mara, Ortt, Palumbo, Rolison, Stec, Tedisco, Walczyk, Weber, and Weik.
PASSED
Ayes: 46
· Nays: 16
Debate Summary
No substantive debate is recorded in this transcript segment. The bill proceeded directly to a roll call vote following the reading of the final section.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |