← All Bills

S1918

An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law — 2024-03-20 · Calendar #636

The Senate passed S1918, sponsored by Senator May, an act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law, on a 45-16 vote. The bill proceeded directly to a roll call vote with no recorded floor debate. Sixteen senators voted in opposition: Ashby, Borrello, Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, Griffo, Helming, Lanza, Martins, Mattera, Murray, O'Mara, Rhoads, Rolison, Stec, Tedisco, Weber and Weik. The measure takes effect immediately upon enactment.
PASSED Ayes: 45 · Nays: 16

Debate Summary

No substantive debate is recorded in this transcript segment. The bill proceeded directly to a roll call vote.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican

An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law to allow DEC to grant rights for renewable energy production and transmission on state reforestation lands — 2023-03-20 · Calendar #204

The New York State Senate passed legislation Monday allowing the Department of Environmental Conservation to grant renewable energy production and transmission rights on state reforestation lands, advancing Gov. Hochul's climate agenda despite Republican opposition. Senate Print 1918, sponsored by Sen. May, passed 46-16 on a largely party-line vote. The bill amends the Environmental Conservation Law to permit DEC to lease reforestation lands for solar, wind, and transmission infrastructure when compatible with the lands' original conservation purposes. Opponents, led by Sen. Walczyk, argued the measure conflicts with Article 5 of the Environmental Conservation Law, which designates reforestation lands specifically for growing forests. Walczyk cited research from SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry showing forests offset 15% of U.S. annual carbon emissions and that converting forests to solar production would reduce carbon sequestration capacity. He also noted the Climate Action Council's scoping plan emphasizes forest preservation rather than solar development on reforestation lands. Sen. May countered that the bill provides DEC discretion to prevent projects that interfere with reforestation goals. She emphasized that most anticipated use would be for transmission corridors connecting remote renewable energy projects, not clearing forests for solar arrays. May noted the state has 600,000 acres of reforestation lands, mostly previously cleared agricultural or logging land being replanted. All 16 nays came from Republican senators. The bill advances to the Assembly.
PASSED Ayes: 46 · Nays: 16

Debate Summary

Sen. Walczyk questioned whether allowing renewable energy production on reforestation lands aligns with Article 5 of the Environmental Conservation Law, which designates these lands specifically for reforestation, timber production, and recreation. He argued that solar panels would conflict with the law's purpose and that the Climate Action Council's scoping plan emphasizes forest carbon sequestration rather than solar development. Sen. May countered that renewable energy is compatible with climate goals, that the bill allows DEC discretion to prevent interference with reforestation purposes, and that most use would likely be for transmission corridors rather than solar production on cleared lands.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
May aye Democrat
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican