S1999
An act to amend the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law — 2024-03-05 · Calendar #149
Debate Summary
The bill addresses direct-to-consumer shipping of cider products. Sen. May explained that New York cider producers are at a disadvantage compared to Washington and Oregon producers who can ship directly to consumers, and that this bill would help cideries access markets. Sen. Skoufis supported the bill and noted the broader issue of direct-to-consumer shipping restrictions affecting distilleries and other small manufacturers across the state. An amendment proposed by Sen. Oberacker regarding toll exemptions for farmers transporting agricultural products was ruled nongermane by the Acting President and the ruling was upheld on appeal.
Amendments
| Sponsor | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sen. Oberacker | Amendment to provide farmers with an exemption from tolls when transporting agricultural products to New York City, arguing both the bill and amendment deal with transportation of agricultural products (cider and farm products respectively) | defeated |
An act to amend the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law — 2023-04-26 · Calendar #593
Debate Summary
Sen. May argued that New York's hard-cider producers operate at a competitive disadvantage compared to out-of-state cideries because they cannot ship directly to consumers online, while wineries can. She noted that New York has over 100 hard-cider producers with an estimated $1.7 billion annual economic impact, and that the bill would allow direct-to-consumer shipment. Sen. May cited successful implementation of this policy during the early pandemic years as evidence the measure would work without complications.