← All Bills

S2433A

An act to amend the Real Property Law regarding ground-lease co-operative apartments — 2025-06-09 · Calendar #634

The New York State Senate passed legislation Tuesday addressing the expiring ground leases of cooperative apartment buildings, protecting approximately 30,000 residents in 12,000 units primarily located in Queens, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. Senate Print 2433A, sponsored by Sen. Liz Krueger, passed 34-28 on a largely party-line vote. The bill clarifies that if a ground-lease co-op building defaults due to escalating land-lease costs, residents can remain as rent-regulated tenants under existing 1974 law rather than losing their homes and equity investments. Krueger argued the residents are primarily middle-income and older New Yorkers on fixed incomes who invested life savings in their homes, and that the bill does not change existing contracts but merely clarifies application of existing rent-stabilization law. Opponents, led by Sen. John Martins and Sen. Anthony Palumbo, argued the bill unconstitutionally interferes with private contracts between sophisticated parties who knowingly purchased discounted units with limited lease terms. Palumbo raised takings clause concerns, citing examples of $50 million penthouses that would lose equity value. Martins contended purchasers received the benefit of buying units at 30-50% below market rate and should not receive additional state protection. Sen. Stavisky, voting in favor, noted that ground-lease co-ops in her Queens district are not wealthy buildings but middle-class residents struggling to maintain their buildings.
PASSED Ayes: 34 · Nays: 28

Debate Summary

The bill addresses the situation of ground-lease co-operative buildings where underlying land leases are expiring or approaching expiration, potentially forcing co-op owners to lose their equity. Sen. Krueger argued the bill protects approximately 30,000 residents in 12,000 units, primarily middle-income and lower-income people in Queens, Brooklyn, and the Bronx, by allowing them to remain as rent-regulated tenants if the building defaults. Opponents, led by Sen. Martins and Sen. Palumbo, contended the bill unconstitutionally interferes with private contracts between sophisticated parties who knowingly purchased discounted units with limited lease terms, and questioned why the state should subsidize affluent residents with rent-stabilized apartments without means-testing.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Bynoe nay Democrat
C. Ryan nay
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Chan nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Hinchey nay Democrat
Lanza nay Republican
Martinez nay Democrat
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
S. Ryan nay
Skoufis nay Democrat
Stec nay Republican
Sutton nay Democrat
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican