← All Bills

S2449

An act to amend the Executive Law — 2024-02-12 · Calendar #327

The Senate passed S2449, sponsored by Sen. Krueger, an act to amend the Executive Law, on a roll call vote of 38-18. The bill, which is scheduled to take effect January 1st, received support from a majority of the chamber despite opposition from 18 senators. The measure was called for a vote without floor debate. Those voting in opposition included Sens. Ashby, Borrello, Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, Griffo, Helming, Lanza, Martins, Mattera, Murray, Oberacker, O'Mara, Ortt, Palumbo, Rhoads, Stec, Tedisco, Weber, and Weik.
PASSED Ayes: 38 · Nays: 18

Debate Summary

No debate was recorded on this bill. The measure was called for a roll call vote and passed with a vote of 38-18.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican

An act to amend the Executive Law — 2023-05-15 · Calendar #483

The New York State Senate passed legislation sponsored by Sen. Krueger to amend the Executive Law and combat age discrimination in employment, with a 40-18 vote on Calendar Number 483, Senate Print 2449. The bill addresses concerns that employers use applicant data and algorithmic screening to exclude older workers from consideration before they have an opportunity to interview. Sen. May noted that 72 percent of women between ages 45 and 74 report experiencing age discrimination, despite research showing older workers are among the most productive and reliable employees. Sen. Krueger emphasized that the current system, where computer algorithms automatically filter out qualified older applicants, prevents employers from accessing talented, skilled workers and harms both job seekers and businesses. The measure takes effect on January 1 following its enactment. Eighteen senators voted against the bill, including Ashby, Borrello, Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, Griffo, Lanza, Martins, Mattera, Murray, Oberacker, O'Mara, Ortt, Palumbo, Rhoads, Stec, Tedisco, Walczyk, Weber, and Weik.
PASSED Ayes: 40 · Nays: 18

Debate Summary

The bill addresses age discrimination in employment, particularly regarding the use of applicant data and algorithmic screening that may exclude older workers before they have an opportunity to interview. Supporters argued that older workers are productive and reliable, and that preventing employers from obtaining age-related data protects workers from discrimination. The bill aims to prevent computer algorithms from automatically filtering out qualified older applicants based on age.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican