S2510A
An Act to Amend the Environmental Conservation Law — 2024-03-21 · Calendar #340
Debate Summary
The bill was initially laid aside on the noncontroversial calendar. When called on the controversial calendar, Sen. Lanza raised a point regarding a proposed amendment. The Acting President ruled the amendment nongermane under Rule 6, Section 4B. Sen. Rhoads appealed the ruling, arguing the amendment regarding congestion pricing and environmental justice was germane to the bill's environmental justice provisions. Rhoads criticized the congestion pricing plan as a money grab lacking environmental benefits, noting the MTA's $48 billion debt and arguing the legislature should retain approval authority over toll amounts rather than delegating to an unelected board. The appeal to overturn the chair's ruling failed 19-0 on a show of hands. The bill was then restored to the noncontroversial calendar by consent and passed unanimously.
Amendments
| Sponsor | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sen. Rhoads | Amendment would require the MTA to return to the legislature for approval of any recommended toll amounts established under congestion pricing, rather than allowing an unelected MTA board to set tolls unilaterally. The amendment mirrors S5934/A3063A. | defeated |
An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law — 2023-02-15 · Calendar #312
Debate Summary
No debate was recorded on this bill. The measure proceeded directly to a roll call vote following the reading of the final section.