S4246D
Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging (EPR) — 2024-06-07 · Calendar #1882
The New York State Senate passed a sweeping extended producer responsibility bill on a 37-23 vote that will require manufacturers to reduce packaging waste by 30 percent over 12 years and establish a producer responsibility organization to manage collection and recycling. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Harckham, represents a major environmental initiative modeled on successful programs in Europe and Canada, but drew fierce opposition from business groups, food manufacturers, and Republican senators who warned it will increase consumer costs and drive companies out of the state. Supporters, including environmental advocates and municipalities facing waste crises, argued the bill shifts the burden of disposal costs from taxpayers to manufacturers and protects public health by reducing toxic packaging materials. The bill includes exemptions for 99 percent of New York farms and medical packaging, and allows companies flexibility to meet reduction targets across their entire product lines rather than on individual packages. Opponents cited a York University study projecting $5 billion in costs over five years and $800 annual increases in grocery bills, though the sponsor countered with a Columbia University study suggesting costs of zero to $4 monthly. The bill also bans certain toxic substances including PVC from food packaging, though it includes a waiver process and exemptions for medical applications. Major food manufacturers including Kraft Heinz have indicated they may pull products from the New York market rather than redesign packaging to comply. The legislation passed largely along party lines, with all 23 nay votes coming from Republican senators.
PASSED
Ayes: 37
· Nays: 23
Debate Summary
Extensive debate over a comprehensive extended producer responsibility bill requiring manufacturers to reduce packaging waste by 30 percent over 12 years, establish a producer responsibility organization, and ban certain toxic substances from packaging. Opponents raised concerns about consumer costs, job losses, and the breadth of opposition from business groups. Supporters argued the bill protects public health, reduces taxpayer burden for waste disposal, and follows successful models in Europe and other states.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| May | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martinez | nay | Democrat |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Ryan | nay | |
| Scarcella-Spanton | nay | Democrat |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |