← All Bills

S6130A

An act to amend the Election Law — 2024-05-28 · Calendar #1153

The State Senate passed legislation amending the Election Law on a 36-21 vote, with the bill sponsored by Sen. Parker. The measure drew criticism from Sen. Rhoads, who argued it would allow attorneys to be dispatched as poll watchers throughout the state to challenge election results in competitive districts—a practice he characterized as potentially liable for abuse. Rhoads contended the bill addresses a minor issue while ignoring what he views as a more fundamental problem: the lack of voter identification requirements at polling places. He pointed to his own legislation, S6139, which would provide free voter identification to all registered voters, as a more commonsense approach to election integrity. "Our election process does not need more attorneys. It needs more common sense," Rhoads said. All 21 senators voting against the bill were Republicans, including Ashby, Borrello, Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick, Gallivan, Griffo, Helming, Lanza, Martins, Mattera, Murray, Oberacker, O'Mara, Ortt, Palumbo, Rolison, Scarcella-Spanton, Stec, Tedisco, Weber, and Weik. The bill takes effect immediately upon enactment.
PASSED Ayes: 36 · Nays: 21

Debate Summary

Sen. Rhoads opposed the bill, arguing it would allow attorneys to be dispatched as poll watchers throughout the state to challenge election results in competitive districts, rather than relying on local officials and residents. He contended the bill addresses a minor issue while ignoring what he views as a more fundamental problem: the lack of voter identification requirements. Rhoads cited his own bill, S6139, which would provide free voter identification to all registered voters, arguing this represents a more commonsense approach to election integrity.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Scarcella-Spanton nay Democrat
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican

An act to amend the Election Law — 2023-06-08 · Calendar #1754

Senate Print 6130A, sponsored by Sen. Parker, an act to amend the Election Law, was laid aside during floor consideration on Calendar Number 1754. Sen. Lanza requested the procedural motion, which was granted by Acting President Bailey. No debate or vote occurred on the measure.

Debate Summary

No debate occurred on this bill. Sen. Lanza moved to lay the bill aside, and the Acting President granted the motion.


An act to amend the Election Law — 2023-06-08 · Calendar #1754

The New York State Senate passed legislation expanding who can serve as poll watchers, allowing attorneys licensed anywhere in the state to monitor elections in any county, not just their home county. Senate Print 6130A passed 41-21 on a roll call vote. Sponsor Sen. Parker argued the measure would bring qualified legal expertise to election oversight, noting that attorneys are officers of the court bound by professional oaths and that state election law is uniform across all counties. Parker emphasized that poll watchers are only permitted to observe and report irregularities, not interact with voters. Opposition centered on concerns that out-of-town attorneys could intimidate voters and poll workers unfamiliar with them. Sen. Walczyk questioned whether attorneys need election law expertise and noted the bill allows political committees to pay attorneys without caps, departing from grassroots local poll watching. Sen. Borrello called the measure a departure from volunteer-based local election integrity, warning it would involve paid lawyers from outside communities. The bill takes effect immediately.
PASSED Ayes: 41 · Nays: 21

Debate Summary

The bill would expand who can serve as poll watchers by allowing attorneys licensed in New York State to serve as poll watchers in any county, not just their home county. Sen. Parker argued the measure would bring qualified legal expertise to election oversight and protect voter rights, noting that election law is uniform statewide and attorneys are officers of the court bound by professional oaths. Sen. Walczyk raised concerns that out-of-town attorneys could intimidate voters and poll workers unfamiliar with them, questioned whether attorneys need election law expertise, and noted the bill allows political committees to pay attorneys without caps. Sen. Borrello opposed the measure as a departure from grassroots local poll watching, arguing it would involve paid lawyers from outside communities rather than local volunteers.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican