S6350B
An act to amend the Education Law — 2024-05-30 · Calendar #1462
Debate Summary
The bill empowers school librarians to curate collections with developmentally appropriate materials for students. Sen. Murray argued that parents should have greater input in material selection, comparing the issue to film ratings systems that restrict access for minors rather than banning content. Sen. May countered that trained librarians serve a public educational function and that the broad majority of parents support diverse reading opportunities, while school boards remain accountable to voters. Sen. Martins supported trusting professional judgment while noting school boards reflect community preferences through voter-elected members.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
An act to amend the Education Law — 2023-06-06 · Calendar #1649
Debate Summary
No substantive debate is recorded in this transcript segment. The bill proceeded directly to a roll call vote following a home-rule message reading.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
Freedom to Read Act — 2023-06-06 · Calendar #1649
Debate Summary
Sen. May argued that book banning in schools disproportionately targets works by and about people of color and LGBTQ individuals, harming student literacy and preventing children from seeing themselves reflected in literature. She contended that exposure to diverse materials helps children succeed academically and that avoiding uncomfortable topics impedes learning about racism and discrimination.