S6419E
An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law — 2024-06-06 · Calendar #1392
Debate Summary
No debate occurred on this bill.
An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law (mattress recycling/Extended Producer Responsibility) — 2024-06-06 · Calendar #1392
Debate Summary
The bill establishes a mattress recycling program under Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principles without a point-of-sale fee. Sen. O'Mara and Sen. Ashby opposed the bill, arguing that a fee structure—used successfully in other states and New York's paint program—would ensure all producers, including foreign manufacturers, contribute fairly and would protect domestic manufacturers like Sealy in Green Island. Sen. Kavanagh defended the no-fee approach, contending that setting a specific fee removes incentives for efficiency and that the bill equally applies to all producers regardless of origin. Sen. May supported the bill for addressing mattress waste in landfills through EPR design principles. Sen. Helming voted against it, citing the exclusion of advanced recycling from the definition of recycling.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Kavanagh | aye | Democrat |
| May | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martinez | nay | Democrat |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Scarcella-Spanton | nay | Democrat |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |