← All Bills

S6419E

An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law — 2024-06-06 · Calendar #1392

Senate Print 6419E, sponsored by Sen. Kavanagh, to amend the Environmental Conservation Law, was laid aside during floor consideration on Calendar Number 1392.

Debate Summary

No debate occurred on this bill.


An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law (mattress recycling/Extended Producer Responsibility) — 2024-06-06 · Calendar #1392

The New York State Senate passed legislation establishing a mattress recycling program under Extended Producer Responsibility principles, with the bill clearing the chamber 41-20 on a roll call vote. Senate Print 6419E, sponsored by Sen. Kavanagh, requires mattress producers and importers to develop and submit recycling plans to the Department of Environmental Conservation, with no point-of-sale fee charged to consumers. The bill addresses an estimated 50,000 mattresses discarded daily in the U.S., with the majority ending up in landfills. Kavanagh noted that three states with operational mattress recycling programs have achieved 74 percent recycling rates and collected 13 million mattresses. However, the bill drew significant Republican opposition, with 20 senators voting against it. Critics, including Sens. O'Mara and Ashby, argued that the absence of a point-of-sale fee—used successfully in four other states and New York's paint recycling program—would disadvantage domestic manufacturers like Sealy in Green Island and fail to ensure foreign producers contribute fairly. Sen. Ashby warned the lack of a fee gives foreign manufacturers, which represent roughly one-third of the market, a competitive advantage. The bill was restored to the noncontroversial calendar after being recalled for amendments requested by industry. Sen. May praised the EPR approach for shifting design responsibility to producers, while Sen. Helming opposed the bill for excluding advanced recycling technologies from its definition of recycling.
PASSED Ayes: 41 · Nays: 20

Debate Summary

The bill establishes a mattress recycling program under Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) principles without a point-of-sale fee. Sen. O'Mara and Sen. Ashby opposed the bill, arguing that a fee structure—used successfully in other states and New York's paint program—would ensure all producers, including foreign manufacturers, contribute fairly and would protect domestic manufacturers like Sealy in Green Island. Sen. Kavanagh defended the no-fee approach, contending that setting a specific fee removes incentives for efficiency and that the bill equally applies to all producers regardless of origin. Sen. May supported the bill for addressing mattress waste in landfills through EPR design principles. Sen. Helming voted against it, citing the exclusion of advanced recycling from the definition of recycling.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Kavanagh aye Democrat
May aye Democrat
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martinez nay Democrat
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Scarcella-Spanton nay Democrat
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican