S7539
An act to amend the Civil Practice Law and Rules — 2024-04-02 · Calendar #620
Debate Summary
Sen. Palumbo appealed the presiding officer's ruling that a proposed amendment on coordinated petit larceny was nongermane to the underlying bill on wage theft. Palumbo argued the amendment was germane because both bills address theft, and that creating a Class E felony for coordinated petit larceny was necessary to address organized retail theft rings. The presiding officer's ruling that the amendment was nongermane was upheld by a show of hands vote of 20 ayes to overrule. The bill was then restored to the noncontroversial calendar and passed on a roll call vote.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |
Amendments
| Sponsor | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sen. Palumbo | Would create a crime of coordinated petit larceny as a Class E felony when a person steals property at the same location as one or more other persons who are also stealing property, causing property damage, or facilitating such conduct. | ruled nongermane and out of order; appeal of ruling defeated |
An act to amend the Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Business Corporation Law, and the Limited Liability Company Law regarding wage theft claims and attachment of property — 2023-06-08 · Calendar #1789
Debate Summary
The bill creates a new ground for attachment under CPLR Section 6201 to allow workers to attach property of company owners based on wage theft claims prior to judgment. Sen. Ramos argued the measure addresses rampant wage theft, citing $25 million in stolen wages recovered in 2022 affecting 18,000 workers. Sen. Palumbo and Sen. Rhoads opposed the bill, arguing it circumvents traditional veil-piercing doctrine by allowing attachment of personal assets of up to 10 owners without proof of their individual involvement in wage theft, without required undertakings, and before judgment is entered, creating a chilling effect on business and potential for frivolous claims.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Ramos | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Fernandez | nay | Democrat |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |