S9073A
An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law — 2026-02-10 · Calendar #266
Debate Summary
The bill seeks to ban PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in cookware and other products to protect New York's drinking water systems and public health. Sen. Harckham argued that New York should set stronger protections than federal standards, citing healthcare costs of $37-59 billion annually and municipal remediation expenses like the $92 million spent in Hoosick Falls. Sen. Stec raised concerns about the bill's broad language, potential unintended consequences for major appliances, and noted that other states including California, Vermont, and Illinois have excluded non-stick cookware from PFAS bans, arguing the approach is economically unmanageable for manufacturers.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Harckham | aye | Democrat |
| May | aye | Democrat |
| Chan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |