S9276
An act to amend the Criminal Procedure Law regarding admission of evidence in sexual offense cases — 2024-05-22 · Calendar #1161
Debate Summary
The bill codifies into statute the admission of evidence regarding prior sexual offenses in criminal proceedings, responding to a Court of Appeals decision in the Weinstein case. Sen. Palumbo argued the bill's language allowing evidence to prove "propensity" is unconstitutional and proposed an amendment to codify the narrower Molineux standard instead, which has been law for 123 years. Sen. Gianaris countered that the bill mirrors federal Rule 413, which has been upheld as constitutional for 30 years in 16 states, and that it properly balances probative value against prejudicial effect. Sen. Martins criticized the Court of Appeals composition while supporting the bill to protect victims.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Gianaris | aye | Democrat |
| Martins | aye | Republican |
| Brisport | nay | Democrat |
| Gonzalez | nay | Democrat |
| Rivera | nay | Democrat |
| Salazar | nay | Democrat |
Amendments
| Sponsor | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sen. Palumbo | Amendment to strike and replace the bill's language with a codification of the Molineux standard, removing the explicit reference to "propensity" and maintaining the narrower standard for admitting prior bad acts evidence that has been law for 123 years | defeated |