S9276
An act to amend the Criminal Procedure Law regarding admission of evidence in sexual offense cases — 2024-05-22 · Calendar #1161
Debate Summary
The bill codifies into statute the admission of evidence regarding prior sexual offenses in criminal proceedings, responding to a Court of Appeals decision in the Weinstein case. Sen. Palumbo argued the bill's language allowing evidence to prove "propensity" is unconstitutional and proposed an amendment to codify the narrower Molineux standard instead, which has been law for 123 years. Sen. Gianaris countered that the bill mirrors federal Rule 413, which has been upheld as constitutional for 30 years in 16 states, and that it properly balances probative value against prejudicial effect. Sen. Martins criticized the Court of Appeals composition while supporting the bill to protect victims.
Transcript Mentions
These votes were extracted from the floor transcript by AI. NYS Senate roll calls are read in full, but AI extraction may not capture every senator — so this list is incomplete and skews toward named dissenting votes. Use the Official API Data table above for the complete roll call.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Gianaris | aye | Democrat |
| Martins | aye | Republican |
| Brisport | nay | Democrat |
| Gonzalez | nay | Democrat |
| Rivera | nay | Democrat |
| Salazar | nay | Democrat |
Amendments
| Sponsor | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sen. Palumbo | Amendment to strike and replace the bill's language with a codification of the Molineux standard, removing the explicit reference to "propensity" and maintaining the narrower standard for admitting prior bad acts evidence that has been law for 123 years | defeated |