Democratic Primary — Council Member
30th Council District
· Queens
· 2025
· Source: NYC BOE Cast Vote Records
Ballots in Contest
12,713
Elimination Rounds
2
Exhausted Ballots
1,923
(15.1% of contest ballots)
Winner
Phil Wong
Final Round Share
51.5% of active
Margin of Victory
320
(3.0pts of active)
Phil Wong led from the start with 36.6% of first-choice votes and held on through 2 rounds of elimination. The largest transfer came when Dermot P. Smyth was eliminated, sending 902 votes (23% of their ballots) to Phil Wong. The final margin was 320 votes (3.0 pts of active ballots), while 1,923 exhausted ballots (15.1%) exceeded that margin — meaning those voters' preferences could in theory have influenced the outcome.
Notable: 1,923 ballots exhausted before the final round —
more than the winner's final-round margin of 320 votes.
This means exhausted voters' preferences, had they ranked additional candidates, could in theory have been enough to affect the outcome — though only if they had ranked in ways that changed the transfers.
How to read this:
Ranked Choice Voting eliminates the last-place candidate each round, transferring their
ballots to each voter's next ranked choice still in the race.
Ballots in contest = voters who ranked at least one candidate here.
Active votes = ballots still assigned to a remaining candidate in a given round.
Exhausted ballots = ballots where all ranked choices have been eliminated.
Vote counts shown in each round reflect votes before that round's elimination.
Ties broken alphabetically by candidate ID (NYC BOE uses random draw; ties are rare at scale).
First-Choice Votes
| Candidate | First-Choice Votes | Share of Contest Ballots | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Wong ✓ | 4,653 | 36.6% | Won |
| Paul Pogozelski | 4,094 | 32.2% | — |
| Dermot P. Smyth | 3,966 | 31.2% | Elim. R1 |
Vote Share — First Choice vs. Final Round
Solid lines = candidates who reached the final round (left dot = Round 1 share, right dot = final-round share). Dashed lines = candidates eliminated before the final round (line ends at elimination, not final round).
Round-by-Round Results
Each bar shows how many active votes each candidate holds going into that round. Step through rounds or press Play to watch candidates gain and lose votes as the race unfolds.
Round 1
Round 1
Eliminated: Dermot P. Smyth
12,713 active votes
| Candidate | Votes (before elimination) | Share of Active | Transfers Out |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Wong | 4,653 | 36.6% | — |
| Paul Pogozelski | 4,094 | 32.2% | — |
| Dermot P. Smyth ✗ | 3,966 | 31.2% | Exhausted: 1,923 · Paul Pogozelski: 1,141 · Phil Wong: 902 |
Round 2
Final
10,790 active votes
| Candidate | Votes (before elimination) | Share of Active |
|---|---|---|
| Phil Wong | 5,555 | 51.5% |
| Paul Pogozelski | 5,235 | 48.5% |
Where Did Eliminated Candidates' Votes Go?
When a candidate is eliminated, their supporters' ballots transfer to whoever they ranked next.
This panel shows how each eliminated candidate's votes distributed — to the winner,
to other remaining candidates, or exhausted (no further choices ranked).
Cards are ordered by votes that went to the winner, highest first.
Note: "Exhausted" means those voters had no more ranked candidates still in the race — their ballots stopped counting at that point.
Dermot P. Smyth
Eliminated R1
3,966 votes redistributed
Candidate Summary
| Candidate | First Choice | Votes at Elimination / Final | Transfer Gain / Loss ⓘ | Eliminated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phil Wong ✓ Winner | 4,653 | 5,555 | +902 | — |
| Paul Pogozelski | 4,094 | 5,235 | +1,141 | — |
| Dermot P. Smyth | 3,966 | 3,966 | 0 | Round 1 |
How Many Candidates Did Voters Choose to Rank?
NYC primary voters may rank up to 5 candidates in order of preference — but they are not required to.
This chart shows how many candidates each voter chose to rank (1 = ranked only their top choice; 5 = used all available rankings).
Voters who ranked only one candidate are more likely to exhaust — their ballot stops counting once that candidate is eliminated.
Ranked 1
6,350 (49.9%)
Ranked 2
2,016 (15.9%)
Ranked 3
4,185 (32.9%)
Ranked 4
162 (1.3%)
Ranked 5
0 (0.0%)