← All Hearings

RACING, GAMING AND WAGERING

2023-01-31 JOINT PUBLIC HEARING: MOBILE SPORTS BETTING IN NY: A FIRST-YEAR REVIEW AND ITS BUDGET IMPACT Chair: Sen. Addabbo View full transcript → Archive

Wire Brief

NEW YORK'S MOBILE SPORTS BETTING GENERATES RECORD REVENUE IN FIRST YEAR, REGULATORS HIGHLIGHT PROBLEM GAMBLING CONCERNS New York's mobile sports betting market generated unprecedented revenue in its first year of operation, with $416.5 billion wagered—the highest in the nation—and $700 million directed to education, according to testimony before a joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing on Tuesday. Robert Williams, executive director of the New York State Gaming Commission, told lawmakers that the state approved 1,001 wagering variations across 106 sports leagues and managed 806 patron complaints in 2022, with 97.3 percent involving customer service issues rather than regulatory violations. Only 58 alleged instances of underage participation were reported through lawfully created accounts, Williams said. The hearing, held at the Legislative Office Building in Albany, examined the regulatory framework governing nine licensed operators and addressed concerns about problem gambling, advertising practices, and event integrity. Williams noted that the commission has implemented strict identity verification requirements, including Know Your Customer software, to prevent underage access. Sen. Nathalia Fernandez, chair of the Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Committee, pressed Williams on how individuals suffering from gambling addiction are identified and connected to treatment services, signaling legislative concern about problem gambling oversight. Sen. Leroy Comrie asked how the commission tracks and prevents underage gambling on mobile platforms. Williams acknowledged that while the commission cannot police parents or relatives who allow underage persons to use lawfully established accounts, research suggests problem gambling rates have remained relatively stable over 40 years despite increased gambling access. He recommended the commission consider adopting the American Gaming Association's responsible marketing code and proposed rules prohibiting sports wagering advertising on college and university campuses. Chair Sen. Joseph Addabbo emphasized that the legislature must remain vigilant about problem gambling and "pre-addiction" issues, stating that New York must maintain the best mobile sports betting product in the nation while protecting consumers. The hearing reflected broad bipartisan support for the program's revenue generation while highlighting emerging regulatory challenges around advertising and problem gambling prevention. NEW YORK'S MOBILE SPORTS BETTING MARKET FACES SUSTAINABILITY CRISIS DESPITE RECORD FIRST-YEAR REVENUE, OPERATORS WARN Albany — Major sports betting operators warned a joint legislative committee on Tuesday that New York's mobile sports betting market, which generated over $900 million in revenue in its first year, faces an unsustainable future under the state's 51 percent tax rate and is already showing signs of decline. Christian Genetski, president of FanDuel, and Jason Robins, CEO of DraftKings, testified before the Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee that despite New Yorkers wagering approximately $16 billion in the market's first year, handle has declined more than 20 percent since the initial launch period. Robins noted that when accounting for promotional expenses, the effective tax rate reaches over 70 percent—the highest in the nation. "We do not believe that this level of economic success is sustainable with the current tax rate of 51 percent," Genetski said, adding that FanDuel has reduced its investment in New York by 50 percent compared to other states due to profitability concerns. Both operators projected dire consequences if the tax rate is not reduced: worse odds for customers, reduced promotional offers, limited marketing partnerships with sports franchises, and potential withdrawal from the market by smaller competitors. Robins warned that such conditions would drive customers toward illegal offshore operators that offer no consumer protections. The operators cited international examples, including France, which legalized sports betting at a similarly high tax rate and subsequently saw the number of licensed operators halve, resulting in a larger unregulated market. Robert Williams, chair of the New York State Gaming Commission, provided detailed testimony on the market's first-year performance, noting 806 complaints against 3.8 million accounts and 1.2 billion transactions. He confirmed that mobile sports betting is restricted to those 21 and older and discussed ongoing concerns about marketing to college students. Sen. Comrie expressed particular concern about protecting college students from sports betting, noting the tension between the 21-year age requirement and college students who begin at age 17. He proposed legislation requiring gambling advertisements to include warnings about addiction. Sen. Addabbo, the committee chair, questioned whether the current revenue projections are sustainable and expressed surprise that the gaming industry, responsible for generating billions in education funding, lacks dedicated budget hearing time. Both FanDuel and DraftKings endorsed Senate Bill 1962, which would lower the tax rate and add four to five licensed operators. Robins also advocated for legalizing iGaming, projecting it could generate $2.3 to $3.1 billion in gross gaming revenue in year one. The hearing underscores a critical policy tension: while New York's first-year numbers appear successful, operators argue the tax structure threatens long-term viability and consumer protection by pushing customers toward unregulated markets. New York's two dominant mobile sports betting operators testified before the Senate Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee on Tuesday that the state's 51 percent tax rate is unsustainable and will force them to reduce consumer promotions, worsen betting odds, and cut marketing investments unless the rate is lowered. Jason Robins of DraftKings and Christian Genetski of FanDuel, who together control approximately 90 percent of New York's mobile sports betting market, argued that the high tax rate is driving customers to neighboring states and illegal betting markets. They presented models showing that lowering the tax rate would generate sufficient market growth to produce more total state revenue despite the lower rate. Sen. Joseph Addabbo, the committee chair, was highly skeptical of their arguments. He repeatedly challenged the operators to provide credible data showing that a tax rate reduction would not harm state revenue, noting that generating an additional $600 million in betting handle would be required to offset lost tax revenue if the rate were reduced from 51 to 35 percent. "That seems like a lot of money," Addabbo said. Robins and Genetski acknowledged they knew the 51 percent rate when they entered the market but argued that circumstances have changed. They said they made aggressive initial investments betting on a future tax reduction, but cannot sustain unprofitable operations indefinitely. Robins noted that New York's market is not growing year-over-year like other states at similar maturity levels, and that New Jersey continues growing faster in its fourth or fifth year. Assemblywoman Carrie Woerner expressed skepticism about the operators' growth projections, noting that achieving the $600 million in additional handle would require more than doubling the current number of bettors from approximately 932,000 to 1.37 million adults. "Color me skeptical," she said, questioning whether there is sufficient untapped demand to justify the operators' claims. The hearing also examined the effective tax rate operators pay when accounting for promotional spending. Robins explained that under current rules, operators are taxed on promotional dollars they distribute to customers, resulting in an effective tax rate of approximately 72 percent rather than the stated 51 percent. He argued that allowing operators to deduct promotional expenses, as some other states do, would be more efficient than reducing the headline tax rate. The testimony comes as S1962, which would reduce the tax rate and potentially increase the number of licensed operators, awaits consideration in the budget process. Addabbo indicated the committee will use the hearing to inform budget negotiations but emphasized that any change must be justified with credible data showing fiscal benefit to the state and education funding. NEW YORK'S MOBILE SPORTS BETTING MARKET SHOWS STRONG FIRST-YEAR REVENUE BUT FACES TROUBLING SECOND-YEAR HEADWINDS, INDUSTRY ANALYSTS WARNED LAWMAKERS TUESDAY. The Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee heard testimony that New York generated $1.35 billion in gross gaming revenue from digital sports wagering in 2022—exceeding prior projections by 23 percent and establishing the state as the nation's largest sports-betting market by per-capita volume. However, analysts from Spectrum Gaming presented data suggesting the market may be losing momentum, with per-capita wagering handle declining 21 percent between the first quarter and the remainder of the year. David Isaacson of Spectrum Gaming attributed the slowdown to operators reducing promotional spending in response to New York's 51 percent tax rate—the highest among competitive markets. "Under the current gaming tax structure, operators will continue to limit promotional spending," Isaacson testified. "In year two it is possible that the New York market could actually decline in terms of overall wagering volume, putting the state's tax revenue at risk." The testimony sparked debate among committee members. Assemblyman Pretlow challenged the analysis, arguing that Q1's inflated numbers—driven by operators like Caesars dumping $300 million in promotional spending—made year-to-year comparisons unfair. He noted December 2022 achieved $2 billion in handle without incentives, suggesting the market remained healthy. Sen. Addabbo similarly pushed back, contending New York had reached a higher revenue ceiling than other states by Q4 and therefore shouldn't be directly compared to their trajectories. Industry representatives from DraftKings and Light & Wonder urged lawmakers to consider iGaming legalization, arguing it would generate substantially more tax revenue than sports betting. Howard Glaser of Light & Wonder projected New York could generate $2-3 billion in annual iGaming revenue, yielding $400 million to $640 million in annual taxes depending on the rate. He noted that six states with iGaming generated nearly twice the tax revenue of 30 states with only sports betting in 2021. Testifiers also highlighted that illegal iGaming currently captures approximately $600 million to $1 billion annually in New York—money lost to offshore operators and the state treasury. Glaser emphasized that iGaming has not cannibalized brick-and-mortar casinos in other states; rather, it has driven growth. New Jersey casinos grew 9 percent last year despite robust iGaming competition. The hearing underscored a central tension in New York's gaming policy: the state's high tax rate generates substantial immediate revenue but may be unsustainable for operators and could suppress long-term market growth. Lawmakers indicated iGaming would be the subject of future roundtable discussions. NEW YORK STATE SENATE REVIEWS MOBILE SPORTS BETTING'S FIRST-YEAR IMPACT, HEARS WARNINGS ON PROBLEM GAMBLING Albany — A joint hearing of the New York State Senate Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee on Tuesday examined the first-year performance of mobile sports betting and its budget impact, with testimony revealing significant concerns about problem gambling services and a stark funding gap. The hearing heard from James Maney, executive director of the New York Council on Problem Gaming, who delivered pointed criticism of the state's allocation of resources to combat gambling addiction. Maney testified that while mobile sports betting generated $700 million in revenue in its first year, less than 1 percent—approximately $6 million, which grew to $12 million based on wagering activity—was dedicated to addiction services and prevention. Maney cited a 25 percent increase in calls to his facilities and warned that the 18- to 24-year-old demographic represents the highest percentage of problem gamblers in New York State. He noted that his daughter, turning 21 next month, "doesn't know one 21-year-old boy that doesn't have an app for mobile sports gambling." He criticized risk-free bet promotions as mechanisms that encourage "chasing losses," one of nine diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. "We give less than 1 percent," Maney said. "Other states get 2.5 percent, 3 percent. Why aren't we? Are not our folks deserving of it: safeguard, protection, prevention, education?" Maney recommended that if the original 3 percent allocation had been implemented, approximately $21 million would be available for prevention, treatment, and education—enough to place educators on every college campus and fund a major public awareness campaign. He advocated for 24/7 live operator services, noting that gambling crises "change in an instant" and that callers at 3 a.m. currently reach voicemail. Sen. Joseph Addabbo, the committee chair, acknowledged that many of Maney's recommendations had been incorporated into the mobile sports betting statute, including account caps and credit card usage limits. He engaged Maney in detailed discussion about how future iGaming expansion funding should be allocated, emphasizing that "it's not how much money we put toward addiction, it's how it's spent." Assemblyman Jeff Gallahan raised a critical gap in public awareness, asking Maney how ordinary citizens could identify warning signs of gambling addiction in friends and family. Maney responded that the lack of public education was itself the problem, contrasting the extensive advertising by betting companies like FanDuel and DraftKings with minimal public health messaging about problem gambling. The hearing also heard testimony on iGaming implementation from Michael Pollock and Howard Glaser, who discussed how online gaming expansion could be structured within New York's constitutional constraints limiting gaming to licensed casinos. The Office of Children and Family Services reported that $5 million in youth sports and education funding authorized under the mobile sports betting statute is being distributed through county youth bureaus to serve underserved children ages 6-18. Assemblyman Keith Pretlow indicated the committee would examine whether current funding levels for 24/7 problem gambling services are adequate, noting that the state has "the revenue" to spend more wisely on addiction services.

Topic Summary

A joint Senate-Assembly committee hearing reviewing New York's first year of mobile sports betting operations, which launched in January 2022. The hearing examined regulatory oversight, revenue generation, problem gambling concerns, and advertising practices, with testimony from the Gaming Commission executive director and industry representatives.

Testimony (15)

Robert Williams agency_official informational
Executive Director, New York State Gaming Commission
Williams provided a comprehensive overview of the Gaming Commission's first-year experience with mobile sports betting, detailing regulatory challenges including wagering menu establishment, sports league authorization, advertising oversight, and customer complaint handling. He discussed ongoing concerns about problem gambling and event integrity, and proposed future regulatory measures including restrictions on college campus advertising and adoption of responsible marketing standards.
Robert Williams agency_official informational
New York State Gaming Commission, Chair
Williams provided comprehensive testimony on mobile sports betting's first-year performance, including revenue figures, consumer complaints, responsible gaming measures, and regulatory framework. He discussed the 51% tax rate, self-exclusion programs, college sports betting concerns, and data breaches. Williams noted that 806 complaints were received in 2022 against 3.8 million accounts and 1.2 billion transactions, which he characterized as relatively low.
Jason Robins industry opposed
DraftKings
Robins testified that DraftKings has modeled scenarios showing a lower tax rate would generate sufficient market growth to offset reduced tax revenue. He argued the current 51 percent rate is unsustainable and forces operators to make choices between unprofitable operations or reducing consumer value through worse odds, fewer promotions, and less marketing. He stated DraftKings entered New York knowing the rate might change and made aggressive investments betting on a future tax reduction, but cannot sustain this indefinitely.
Christian Genetski industry supportive
DraftKings
Genetski testified on behalf of DraftKings regarding employment and market dynamics. He noted the company employs approximately 3,500 people total, with about one-third (roughly 1,167) based in New York where the company has its headquarters. He discussed the potential for expanding betting types (MVP awards, Rookie of the Year) and emphasized that such expansions would require sustainable tax rates to justify marketing investments.
Michael Pollock industry supportive
Not specified in transcript
Pollock addressed questions about iGaming implementation, noting that different states handle it differently but that casinos and racinos should be participants. He explained that allowing them to participate would enable marketing of other amenities and grow both land-based and iGaming revenues.
Christian Genetski industry opposed
FanDuel, President
Genetski testified that while the first year generated $900+ million in revenue, the 51% tax rate is unsustainable and causing market decline. He argued that handle has declined 20% since launch, market penetration is only 6.4% compared to 7.4-7.5% in other states, and FanDuel has reduced investment in New York by 50% compared to other states. He advocated for tax rate reduction to levels comparable to other states and referenced Senate Bill 1962.
Christian Genetski industry opposed
FanDuel
Genetski testified that FanDuel's penetration rate in New York is 7.4 percent compared to Louisiana's 6.4 percent, suggesting New York's market has room to grow. He explained that FanDuel's 2023 budget plans involve spending 50 percent less in New York than in comparable states despite New York being their largest market, and that they project acquiring 300,000 additional users if the tax rate is lowered. He argued the first five years are critical for building customer loyalty and that the current tax structure prevents necessary investment.
Jason Robins industry supportive
DraftKings
Robins, CEO of DraftKings, testified on market dynamics, iGaming, and tax rate impacts. He stated DraftKings has 150 employees in New York. He argued that illegal iGaming markets are as robust as illegal sports betting markets, with virtually all illegal offshore sportsbooks offering online casino games. He emphasized that unsustainable tax rates prevent operators from investing in new product offerings and marketing, and that data from New Jersey and other states shows brick-and-mortar casinos benefit from online expansion.
Howard Glaser agency_official informational
Not specified in transcript
Glaser explained New York's constitutional constraints on gaming, noting that gaming can only occur through licensed casinos. He described how the committee created a creative solution to allow additional participants in sports betting while meeting constitutional standards, and suggested a similar approach could work for iGaming expansion.
Jason Robins industry opposed
DraftKings, Co-founder, CEO, and Chairman
Robins echoed Genetski's concerns about the 51% tax rate, noting the effective tax rate is actually over 70% when accounting for promotional expenses. He argued the current tax regime is unsustainable and will force operators to offer worse odds, reduce promotions, and limit marketing partnerships. He also advocated for legalizing iGaming, citing projections of $2.3-3.1 billion in year-one GGR and $3.6-4.3 billion by year 5.
Michael Pollock academic informational
Spectrum Gaming
Pollock, managing director of Spectrum Gaming, provided analytical perspective on digital gaming trends. He emphasized that the gaming industry has adapted to recognize online wagering as an omnichannel opportunity rather than a cannibalization threat. He outlined principles for tax policy, including examining broader fiscal impacts beyond simple tax rate multiplications, and stressed that change is constant in gaming requiring ongoing legislative monitoring.
Nina Aledort agency_official informational
Office of Children and Family Services, Deputy Commissioner
Aledort's testimony (read into the record by Sen. Addabbo) described OCFS administration of $5 million in annual youth sports and education opportunity funding authorized in the mobile sports wagering enabling statute. The funding supports youth ages 6-18 across New York through county youth bureaus and NYC.
David Isaacson academic informational
Spectrum Gaming
Isaacson, senior vice president of Spectrum Gaming, presented detailed market analysis of New York's first year of digital sports wagering and projections for iGaming. He reported that New York generated $1.35 billion in gross gaming revenue (GGR) from digital wagering in 2022, exceeding 2021 projections by 23 percent. However, he identified concerning trends: handle declined 21 percent from Q1 to subsequent quarters, and Q4 generated only 29 percent of annual volume compared to 35-49 percent in other states. He attributed this to operators reducing promotional spending due to the 51 percent tax rate.
James Maney advocate opposed
New York Council on Problem Gaming, Executive Director
Maney provided extensive testimony on problem gambling concerns, citing a 25% increase in calls to his facilities and warning that mobile sports betting expansion poses significant risks, particularly to college-aged youth (18-24), who represent the highest percentage of problem gamblers in New York. He criticized the allocation of only $6 million (growing to $12 million) for addiction services as insufficient—less than 1% of $700 million in gaming revenue—and recommended at least $21 million if the original 3% allocation had been implemented. He advocated for 24/7 live operator services, college campus educators, improved voluntary self-exclusion protocols, and major public awareness campaigns.
Howard Glaser industry supportive
Light & Wonder (formerly Scientific Games)
Glaser, global head of government affairs for Light & Wonder, congratulated New York on its successful sports betting launch and advocated strongly for iGaming legalization. He noted Light & Wonder's VLT program generated $575 million in revenue in the prior year and nearly $7 billion cumulatively. He presented data showing iGaming generates more tax revenue than sports betting: six iGaming states generated nearly twice the tax revenue of 30 sports betting states in 2021. He projected New York could generate over $2 billion in annual GGR from iGaming and emphasized that iGaming has driven growth in brick-and-mortar casinos in every state where implemented.

Senator Engagement (16)

Senator Engagement Stance Focus Areas Summary
Assemblyman Pretlow skeptical Tax rate effects on handle Q1 vs. Q4 comparison methodology Promotional spending impact on volume December 2022 performance data Assemblyman Pretlow challenged Spectrum's analysis, arguing that Q1's high numbers were artificially inflated by operator promotional spending (citing Caesars' $300 million investment) and therefore shouldn't be compared to Q4. He suggested Q1 2023 comparisons would be more meaningful and noted December 2022 achieved $2 billion in handle without incentives.
Sen. Addabbo supportive Overall success of mobile sports betting Revenue generation for education Problem gambling and addiction prevention Sustainability and future expansion Regulatory oversight and improvements Chair Addabbo opened the hearing emphasizing the phenomenal success of mobile sports betting in New York, highlighting record-setting numbers and $700 million in education funding. He stressed the legislature's responsibility to maintain vigilance on problem gambling and pre-addiction issues, and to ensure New York maintains the best product in the nation.
Sen. Addabbo neutral Revenue sustainability and long-term projections Budget hearing status for gaming industry Brick-and-mortar casino impacts Problem gambling funding and protocols Marketing restrictions for colleges and universities Regulatory timeline for proposed changes Sen. Addabbo, the committee chair, engaged substantively on multiple fronts, expressing surprise that the gaming industry lacks dedicated budget hearing time despite generating $5 billion in revenue. He questioned sustainability of current numbers, sought assurance on brick-and-mortar casino protections, and requested updates on the regulatory process for implementing proposed safeguards.
Sen. Addabbo skeptical Fiscal impact of tax rate reduction Credibility of data supporting lower tax rate Illegal market activity and evidence Whether operators had business plans accounting for 51 percent rate Budget process and education funding implications Addabbo was highly engaged and skeptical of the operators' arguments. He repeatedly challenged them to provide credible data showing that a tax rate reduction would not harm state revenue, noting that $600 million in additional handle would be needed to offset lost tax revenue. He emphasized that any change must be justified through the budget process and expressed doubt about the operators' claims, noting they knew the 51 percent rate when they entered the market.
Sen. Addabbo supportive Employment impact in New York Promotional spending and tax rates iGaming market potential and illegal market losses Revenue projections and comparisons to other states Expansion of betting types (MVP, Rookie of Year awards) Market ceiling and Q4 performance analysis Sen. Addabbo demonstrated strong engagement throughout, asking detailed questions about employment, promotional dynamics, and iGaming potential. He signaled support for the industry while also indicating interest in iGaming as a future policy matter. He challenged Spectrum's Q4 analysis, arguing New York had reached a higher ceiling than other states and therefore shouldn't be directly compared.
Sen. Addabbo supportive iGaming implementation Problem gambling funding allocation Spending priorities for addiction services Voluntary self-exclusion protocols College campus educators 24/7 services Sen. Addabbo chaired the hearing and demonstrated strong engagement with problem gambling issues. He credited Maney's input for being incorporated into mobile sports betting statutory language (account caps, credit card usage caps) and engaged in detailed discussion about how addiction funding should be spent, noting that the $6 million allocation grew to $12 million based on statutory language tied to wagering activity.
Sen. Comrie neutral Underage gambling prevention Online/mobile access controls Age verification tracking Sen. Comrie asked how the commission ensures underage gambling doesn't occur online and whether there are tracking mechanisms, indicating concern about minor access to mobile platforms.
Sen. Comrie skeptical College sports betting restrictions Age requirements for mobile sports betting Campus safeguards against student gambling Advertising warnings about gambling addiction Sen. Comrie expressed concern about protecting college students from sports betting, noting the tension between the 21-year age requirement and college students starting at age 17. He advocated for establishing boundaries to keep students focused on learning and proposed legislation requiring gambling advertisements to include warnings about harmful and addictive effects.
Sen. Fernandez neutral Problem gambling services and treatment Identifying individuals suffering from gambling addiction Tracking and outreach mechanisms Connection to support services Sen. Fernandez, chair of the Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Committee, asked pointed questions about what services are provided for gambling addiction sufferers and how individuals showing signs of addiction are identified and connected to help, signaling concern about problem gambling oversight.
Sen. Helming supportive Expansion of funding distribution Rural area support School districts funding Children's mental health School safety and security Sen. Helming expressed interest in expanding how mobile sports betting revenue is distributed, particularly to rural school districts for mental health and school safety programs. She thanked leadership for pushing through mobile sports betting legislation.
Sen. Helming skeptical Impact of mobile sports betting on brick-and-mortar facilities Impact on racinos specifically iGaming cannibalization concerns Participation opportunities for existing facilities Sen. Helming asked pointed questions about impacts on her district's racino and casino, expressing concern about cannibalization. She appeared skeptical of claims that iGaming wouldn't harm existing facilities, though testifiers provided data to address her concerns. She focused on ensuring existing gaming facilities could participate in new revenue streams.
Sen. Helming neutral iGaming implementation structure Casino participation in iGaming Sen. Helming asked clarifying questions about whether iGaming would be run through casinos and how multiple licensees would be handled, seeking to understand the policy framework for potential expansion.
Sen. Tedisco supportive Revenue importance to the state Education funding Platform integrity and age verification Protecting minors from unauthorized access Saratoga thoroughbred racing facility Ranking member Tedisco emphasized the importance of revenue to New York State and the significance of $700 million in education funding. He highlighted concerns about platform integrity and ensuring no minors or unauthorized persons access mobile sports betting, and praised the leadership of both committee chairs.
Sen. Tedisco skeptical Number of states with legalized sports wagering Tax rate sustainability Legislative responsibility for tax policy Sen. Tedisco questioned why the state would consider reducing the current tax rate given the market's success, framing tax policy as a legislative responsibility that should be accountable to the public. He drew a parallel to the Thruway Authority's proposed 75% increase.
Sen. Tedisco neutral Education funding implications Tedisco was mentioned by Addabbo as the Education Committee ranker who would not want to see reductions in educational funds resulting from lower tax rates, but did not directly engage in questioning.
Sen. Tedisco neutral Suicide rates associated with problem gambling Comparative addiction data Sen. Tedisco asked a focused question about suicide rates in problem gambling compared to other addictions, seeking data on the severity of gambling-related harms.

Referenced Bills