Sen. Brian Kavanagh
Brian Kavanagh is a Democratic state senator representing New York's 27th Senate District, a heavily Democratic seat (D+60) that he has held since 2017. In the 2025 session, he sponsored 132 bills with a primary focus on environmental conservation, public health, and housing — including legislation on affordable housing preservation, climate risk in insurance markets, and tenant protections — and voted with the Democratic caucus 99.9% of the time across 1,443 recorded votes. He raised $718,080 in campaign contributions for the 2022–2026 cycle, with 79.4% coming from individual donors and just 1.1% from corporations or PACs.AI
Topic Focus AI
Topics extracted by AI from floor speeches, committee hearing transcripts, and sponsored legislation. Bill and hearing citations link to source records for verification. Tag size reflects number of supporting citations.
Key Issues
From committee hearings, floor debate, and bill sponsorship.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Based on complete Senate roll call records.
Bill Outcomes 2025 Session
Covers Senate-sponsored bills only. Status from Open Legislation API.
Committee Assignments
Electoral History SD-27
General Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Brian Kavanagh 100.0% (88,217) | Uncontested | — |
| 2022 | Brian Kavanagh 95.9% (62,906) | Eric J. Rassi 4.1% (2,684) | 91.8pts |
| 2020 | Brad M. Hoylman 100.0% (127,942) | Uncontested | — |
| 2018 | Brad M. Hoylman 100.0% (107,233) | Uncontested | — |
| 2016 | Brad M. Hoylman 95.7% (118,371) | Stephen Roberts 4.3% (5,317) | 91.4pts |
| 2014 | Brad M. Hoylman 85.5% (46,129) | Frank J. Scala 14.5% (7,829) | 71.0pts |
| 2012 | Brad M. Hoylman 100.0% (93,569) | Uncontested | — |
| 2010 | Carl Kruger 73.2% (25,004) | Avrahom Rosenberg 26.8% (9,152) | 46.4pts |
| 2008 | Carl Kruger 93.3% (42,066) | Vyacheslav Patrin 6.7% (3,040) | 86.5pts |
| 2006 | Carl Kruger 93.7% (27,668) | Mildred R. Mahoney 6.3% (1,853) | 87.4pts |
| 2004 | Carl Kruger 96.7% (60,656) | Stephen Walters 3.3% (2,038) | 93.5pts |
| 2002 | Carl Kruger 96.5% (37,119) | Stephen Walters 3.5% (1,348) | 93.0pts |
| 2000 | Thomas K. Duane 82.9% (88,041) | Karol L. Murov 15.1% (16,021) | 67.8pts |
| 1998 | Thomas K. Duane 85.9% (61,353) | Karol L. Murov 14.1% (10,059) | 71.8pts |
| 1996 | Catherine M. Abate 100.0% (74,725) | Uncontested | — |
Primary Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 (Democratic) | Brad M. Hoylman 74.4% (31,920) | Elizabeth G. Glass 25.6% (10,957) | 48.9pts |
Special Elections
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | David Storobin 50.0% (11,097) | Lewis A. Fidler 50.0% (11,084) | ⚡ 0.1pts |
Source: NYS Board of Elections certified results. ⚡ = margin under 10 pts.
Vulnerability Index SD-27
Base lean: D+70
- Uncontested in 3 of last 4 cycles — opposition quality unknown
Scenario model: ±5pt national environment shift applied to district base lean (D+70). Base lean blends voter registration (40%) with recent contested general election margins (60%), using up to the last 4 general elections with margins under 40 points. Ratings: Safe D/R = 20+ pts, Likely = 10–19 pts, Lean = 4–9 pts, Toss-up = within 3 pts. "Generic ballot" refers to national partisan polling used to model favorable/unfavorable cycle environments. Not a prediction — reflects structural competitiveness under different cycle environments.
Top Co-Sponsors
District 27 Profile
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Voter registration: NYS Board of Elections (Nov. 2025).
Voter Registration
Campaign Finance (2022–2026)
Top Donors
Source: NYS Board of Elections via data.ny.gov. Itemized monetary contributions only. ↔ Bills = donor industry aligns with bill sponsorship focus area.
Data through 2026-03-28.
Lobbying Activity 2025
Top Lobbying Issues
Top Organizations Lobbying This Senator
Source: NY Commission on Ethics and Lobbying in Government via data.ny.gov. Counts reflect bi-monthly disclosure records filed with the Ethics Commission — not individual meetings. ★ Chair = lobbying issue overlaps with a committee this senator chairs. ↔ Overlap = matches committee membership or bill sponsorship focus.
Demographics
Commute Mode
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (2024). Race and ethnicity figures may not sum to 100% — Hispanic/Latino is an ethnicity category that overlaps with racial groups.
Voting Record
1 additional dissenting vote across other topics
From 1,443 recorded floor votes via OpenLeg API. Dissenting votes grouped by law section to reveal policy patterns.
Votes through 2026-02-10.
Floor Speeches: In Support (23) AI
Highlighted $3 billion in housing investments, including public housing, Mitchell-Lama preservation, and rental assistance programs that bring down costs for families.
The bill addresses a decade-old federal loophole allowing food producers to keep ingredient safety analyses secret. While welcoming federal action, he argued New York should lead on transparency and that companies already required to conduct safety analyses should disclose them, citing similar requirements in Texas and most other jurisdictions worldwide.
The bill sponsor emphasized that the federal food regulatory system has major gaps, particularly the GRAS loophole, and that New York should require disclosure of ingredients and their underlying science to consumers and the Department of Agriculture and Markets.
This is a necessary step that will give the Department of Financial Services tools to enforce federal and state credit and debt collection laws. The protections extend to the rest of the state what residents of 30 states and New York City already have.
The bill codifies the longstanding national standard that practices with disparate impact on protected classes constitute housing discrimination, effectively maintaining the status quo in New York law and upholding protections against discrimination in housing.
Committee Hearing Engagement (27) AI
| Date | Committee | Engagement | Stance | Focus Areas | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | Climate change risk pricing and modeling Proprietary models and DFS regulatory oversight Catastrophic climate modeling implementation Discount mandates and amounts | Sen. Kavanagh probed the technical aspects of how climate risk is priced and whether DFS has adequate oversight of insurance company models. He questioned whether sophisticated climate models are being used in rate-setting and whether DFS can access and review them, suggesting concern about regulatory gaps. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | discount approval process community-level mitigation discounts liability insurance premium increases rate approval methodology data collection on discounts | Sen. Kavanagh pressed Asrow on whether DFS approves specific discount percentages, whether community-level mitigation investments receive discounts, and how DFS justifies rate increases when policyholders report doubling or tripling premiums. He requested a list of current discounts and signaled concern about the adequacy of explanations for liability insurance increases. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) as model for insurer obligations Reinsurance regulation and cost-shifting to New York consumers State-backed reinsurance facility Captive insurance entities Liability rate increases and social inflation Data breakdown for bundled insurance products Actuarial justification for rate increases | Sen. Kavanagh engaged extensively with Superintendent Asrow on potential policy solutions, exploring CRA-style obligations for insurers, state reinsurance facilities, and captive insurance models. He expressed skepticism about liability rate doubling and questioned whether rates are based exclusively on New York data. He noted that high jury awards have existed for decades, suggesting current rate increases may not be fully justified by recent changes. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | Evidence of fraud in New York Distinction between rising litigation costs and fraud/abuse Transparency of insurance discounts Incentives for risk-reducing behavior | Sen. Kavanagh challenged testifiers to provide concrete evidence that fraud is pervasive and growing in New York, distinguishing between anecdotal evidence and hard data. He noted that rising litigation costs do not necessarily indicate fraud and questioned whether doctors are actually providing unnecessary treatment at attorneys' direction. He also pressed on whether insurance companies are transparent about available discounts for risk mitigation. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | Litigation costs and defense spending data Distinction between fraud claims and coverage disputes Climate change causation and risk assessment Systematic discount approaches for risk-reduction technologies Captive insurance models HPD underwriting requirements and their impact on costs | Sen. Kavanagh pressed witnesses on data gaps and inconsistencies, particularly regarding litigation costs, fraud versus coverage disputes, and the insurance industry's position on climate change. He expressed surprise and concern that insurers claim not to assess whether policy changes increase greenhouse gases, calling it 'putting your head in the sand.' He also questioned why discounts for risk-reduction technologies vary widely across insurers despite available data. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | moderate | neutral | Litigation financing and its role in incentivizing bad behavior General appreciation for testimony quality | Sen. Kavanagh asked limited questions, focusing on litigation financing as a potential cost driver. He acknowledged the passage of time and deferred further questioning, expressing appreciation for the witnesses' testimony. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | neutral | liability insurance cost increases social inflation as driver of costs affordable housing sector impacts data on property insurance-specific trends commercial umbrella coverage | Sen. Kavanagh asked detailed questions about the doubling of liability insurance costs over 4-year periods and whether social inflation could explain such rapid increases. He sought data specific to property insurance (rather than auto or medical liability) and asked about commercial umbrella coverage impacts on affordable housing. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | supportive | Public excess liability fund models in other jurisdictions Captive insurance mechanisms and state funding Risk mitigation measures and insurance premium discounts Building features that reduce loss risk Safe Housing Incentive Program and behavioral changes DFS role in creating standards for insurance credits | Sen. Kavanagh engaged substantively with testifiers on specific policy mechanisms, asking detailed questions about existing models for excess liability funds, the $5 million captive insurance fund, and what risk mitigation measures are actually resulting in premium discounts. He probed whether sensible building features are being rewarded by insurers and discussed the role of DFS in creating standards. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | HAI Group insurance mechanism and HUD requirements Discrimination against affordable housing and rent-stabilized properties Documentation of insurance company practices State-backed reinsurance models in other jurisdictions Insurance discount transparency and incentives Longer-term insurance contract mechanisms | Sen. Kavanagh pressed witnesses for specific documentation of discriminatory practices, noting that prior legislation banned discrimination against affordable housing and questioning why the Apartment Association didn't recommend strengthening that enforcement. He sought evidence of insurers refusing coverage based on rent-stabilized status and asked detailed questions about reinsurance models, discount mechanisms, and multi-year contract structures. He appeared focused on distinguishing between fraud and legitimate causation disputes. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | supportive | Multiyear insurance policies with spread payments Regulation of insurer practices Subrogation claims against fossil fuel companies Risk mitigation and retrofitting requirements Transparency in insurance discounts Colorado's insurance legislation as a model Property, community and landscape scale mitigation in pricing models | Sen. Kavanagh demonstrated strong engagement throughout the hearing, asking detailed questions about regulatory mechanisms to require multiyear policies, subrogation claims against fossil fuel companies, and risk mitigation requirements. He appeared supportive of climate-focused insurance reform and sought expert perspectives on best practices from other states, particularly Colorado. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | moderate | skeptical | Insurance industry investments in fossil fuels State-level insurance programs (Florida My Safe Home) Precedent for insurer litigation against responsible parties | Sen. Kavanagh questioned whether insurers might be reluctant to sue fossil fuel producers due to their own substantial investments in the industry, suggesting a potential conflict of interest. He also explored state-level insurance programs as potential models. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | supportive | Affordable housing viability and insurance costs Captive insurance model expansion and obstacles Competitive practices by other insurers Parametric insurance products Consumer protections and Bill of Rights Data collection and transparency | Sen. Kavanagh demonstrated sustained engagement throughout the hearing, asking detailed questions about the captive insurance model, regulatory barriers, and competitive practices. He expressed appreciation for the collaborative work of panelists and signaled support for the Insurer Communities Act. He appeared focused on understanding practical solutions and implementation challenges. |
| 2025-11-18 | HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | high | skeptical | Insurance discounts and incentives for risk mitigation Roof age and fortified roof requirements Mandatory vs. voluntary discount structures Coordination between DFS, insurers, and government subsidies Best practices from other states (Florida, Colorado) Insurance literacy and consumer awareness Mortgage market health and insurance availability | Sen. Kavanagh engaged extensively and skeptically with industry representatives about whether the free market alone would produce adequate incentives for risk mitigation. He pushed for formalized building-level mitigation crediting and broader discount structures, noting that public subsidies for resilience improvements should be coordinated with insurance discounts. He questioned why customers should have to wonder if their risk-reduction efforts qualify for discounts. |
| 2025-02-27 | Joint Legislative Hearing - Senate Finance Committee and Assembly Ways and Means Committee | high | supportive | City of Yes funding and allocation Mixed-income revolving loan fund Lead abatement program Public housing capital funding Infill housing and V-RIP programs Small rental housing development Affordable housing preservation and distress Captive insurance solutions TOPA and tenant opportunity to purchase Embodied carbon in construction | Sen. Kavanagh was highly engaged, asking substantive questions about program implementation, funding mechanisms, and capacity. He demonstrated deep knowledge of housing programs and asked follow-up questions about specific initiatives. He expressed support for TOPA and other tenant-focused policies and worked to understand the practical implementation of various proposals. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | high | skeptical | Mitchell-Lama funding and capital allocations Pro-Housing Communities program mechanics and legal authority RUSH program for state property repurposing $250 million capital allocation structure and agency management Affordability requirements for state site conversions SUNY and MTA site potential DOT property subparts and conveyance structure | Sen. Kavanagh engaged extensively with detailed, probing questions about program mechanics, legal authority, and funding allocation. He signaled skepticism about the vagueness of the $250 million state property repurposing program and questioned why ESD rather than HCR would manage the funds. He requested additional information and clarity on multiple fronts. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | high | neutral | Homeowner Stabilization Fund community list Pro-Housing Community program and NYC eligibility 40,000 vacancy figure and housing emergency standards Vacant apartment warehousing | Sen. Kavanagh engaged substantively on technical details, seeking clarification on the Homeowner Stabilization Fund's 10 communities, NYC's Pro-Housing status, and the meaning of the 40,000 vacancy figure. Established that the 4 percent vacancy rate aligns with the historic 5 percent threshold for housing emergency, suggesting current vacancy levels are not abnormal. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | high | neutral | Affordable housing relief fund structure COVID-related arrears and building distress HCR program adequacy Forgivable loan mechanisms | Sen. Kavanagh asked detailed, substantive questions about the affordable housing relief fund proposal, seeking to understand how it would work and why existing HCR programs are inadequate. He thanked all panelists for their work. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | high | skeptical | Clarifying status of proposed housing package Budget process concerns HOPP funding baseline Program effectiveness | Sen. Kavanagh challenged McKee's characterization of a 'cooked up' housing package, stating he was not aware of such a bill and expressing skepticism about the claims. He expressed concern about the budget process where programs are zeroed out in January and then restored, noting this creates uncertainty. He expressed support for full funding of programs like HOPP. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | high | neutral | General hearing management Thanking panelists Directing testimony flow | Sen. Kavanagh served as co-chair and managed the hearing flow, thanking panelists and directing questions to other senators. Made a light joke about Chairwoman Weinstein leaving the room. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | high | supportive | Clarification on $250 million affordable housing stabilization fund Public housing capital funding and management challenges Coordination between housing advocacy organizations | Sen. Kavanagh asked clarifying questions about overlapping funding requests from different housing organizations, seeking to ensure a unified ask. He expressed strong support for public housing capital funding and engaged substantively with Barbara Williams about management accountability while supporting the $4.5 billion request. |
| 2024-02-14 | FINANCE | moderate | supportive | Housing budget | Sen. Kavanagh served as cochair for the housing hearing and expressed appreciation for testimony received, noting his long service history with Chairwoman Weinstein in the Assembly. |
| 2023-03-01 | FINANCE | high | supportive | Housing Stabilization Fund Lead abatement program Climate Friendly Homes Fund Fair housing testing programs HOPP program funding Public housing capital needs Good-cause eviction Housing Access Vouchers | As Housing Committee Chair, Sen. Kavanagh asked detailed questions about new funding mechanisms, expressing enthusiasm for lead abatement and climate initiatives while raising concerns about adequacy of fair housing funding and the need for continued Legislature funding of HOPP and other immediate-need programs. He signaled support for the overall direction while noting gaps. |
| 2023-03-01 | FINANCE | high | skeptical | Homeowners Stabilization Fund details and implementation ERAP funding gaps and arrears in affordable housing provider portfolios Funding sources for covering accumulated rent arrears | Sen. Kavanagh asked detailed follow-up questions about the Homeowners Stabilization Fund's implementation details, sought clarification on ERAP-related arrears in the affordable housing portfolio, and questioned whether relief mechanisms actually benefit tenants. His questions suggested concern about the adequacy of the administration's response to housing provider financial distress. |
| 2023-03-01 | FINANCE | high | supportive | Housing Opportunity Protection Program (HOPP) funding Fair housing enforcement and testing Source of income discrimination Fair Housing Organizations capacity | Sen. Kavanagh demonstrated strong support for fair housing initiatives and HOPP funding. He asked detailed questions about why fair housing enforcement organizations are critical, the capacity to expand services statewide with $7 million total funding, and how source of income discrimination protections work in practice. He signaled support for the $5 million additional allocation requested. |
| 2023-03-01 | FINANCE | moderate | supportive | ERAP program design and unintended consequences Rent arrears in affordable housing Public housing and Section 8 housing coverage gaps | Sen. Kavanagh asked detailed questions about ERAP's design flaws and how it failed affordable housing buildings, particularly regarding deprioritization of public and Section 8 housing. He expressed concern about the state's contribution to the problem and appeared supportive of solutions like the Tenant Fund. |
| 2023-03-01 | FINANCE | high | supportive | J-51 tax program exemption component Commercial conversion tax incentives (Part P) Office conversion affordability requirements Opt-in outside the city proposal Support for NPCs and RPCs | Sen. Kavanagh expressed strong support for Neighborhood Preservation Companies and Rural Preservation Companies, hoping to meet their funding requests. He engaged substantively with Mr. Cestero on technical details of J-51, commercial conversion incentives, and office conversion affordability levels, noting the lessons from the 421-g post-9/11 program. |
| 2023-03-01 | FINANCE | high | neutral | sufficiency of double-credit incentive for affordability whether Governor's proposal adequately incentivizes affordability alternative affordability frameworks | Sen. Kavanagh asked pointed questions about whether the Governor's double-credit system for affordable units provides sufficient incentive, and whether testifiers believed it met affordability goals. He requested written feedback from testifiers on potential amendments to the Governor's framework and elements that might require going beyond the proposal. |
Floor Amendments (1)
| Date | Bill | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-23 | S2960 | Amendments to S2960 offered on page 77 | received |