R Sen. Steve Rhoads
Key Issues
From committee hearings, floor debate, and bill sponsorship.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Based on complete Senate roll call records.
Top Co-Sponsors
District 5 Profile
Voter Registration
Demographics
Voting Record
Dissenting Votes by Topic
34 additional dissenting votes across other topics
From 1,443 recorded floor votes via OpenLeg API. Dissenting votes grouped by law section to reveal policy patterns.
Floor Speeches: In Support (5)
Rhoads praised Eagle Scouts as individuals embodying trustworthiness, bravery, and dedication to community service, and argued that a distinctive license plate is an appropriate way for the state to recognize their exceptional character and contributions.
Thanked the sponsor and constituent Rena Gasparis for her tireless advocacy. He characterized the legislation as closing an important gap in law by punishing those who intentionally drive on suspended or revoked licenses.
Drew on personal experience with his father's motorized wheelchair, emphasizing that repair delays take away independence. Stressed that expanding repair facility options is crucial because waiting even days for repairs confines users to home and bed.
Voted affirmatively despite criticizing the lack of transparency and the fact that the state budget was a month overdue, with major issues like MTA payroll taxes and discovery laws still unresolved behind closed doors.
Supported the study as important given the serious dangers of lithium-ion battery fires, but argued the state should "pump the brakes" on electrification mandates for school buses and vehicles until safety technology catches up with climate goals.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition (23)
Expressed concern that the chapter amendment eviscerated key transparency provisions by eliminating pre-installation public notice, converting advance registration to after-action reporting, and removing specific penalty provisions, suggesting telecommunications company influence.
Opposed the bill because it restricts horseshoe crabs from biomedical research use, which he believes inhibits New York State's ability to innovate in biomedical research, though he supports restrictions for other purposes.
He argued the bill creates an open-ended definition of intimidation that could lead to frivolous litigation against poll workers and election inspectors simply doing their jobs, and noted that 80 percent of New Yorkers support voter ID requirements for election integrity.
The vague language defining unfair and abusive practices gives the Attorney General dangerous discretionary power to pursue actions based on undefined standards, allowing action against businesses for acts they 'are about to engage in' without clear standing or actual harm.
Opposed the bill because it mandates coverage without providing a good-faith religious exemption for faith-based healthcare companies, creating issues for institutions with religious objections to contraceptive coverage.
Committee Hearing Engagement (2)
| Date | Committee | Engagement | Stance | Focus Areas | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-26 | Senate Finance Committee and Assembly Ways and Means Committee | high | skeptical | Workers' compensation provider participation barriers Medical fee schedules and administrative burden Health insurer payment for disputed workers' compensation claims Corrections officer workplace safety and legal status of recall orders Department of Labor enforcement of workplace safety standards | Sen. Rhoads questioned whether the Workers' Compensation Board's proposals would actually address provider participation barriers, noting that administrative burden and low fees are the real issues. He also pressed on the legality of recalling workers on workers' compensation or FMLA leave. |
| 2025-02-26 | New York State Senate Finance Committee and Assembly Ways and Means Committee | moderate | skeptical | New York business climate and tax burden MWBE cross-certification between county and state | Sen. Rhoads cited Forbes and IRS data showing New York's poor business climate ranking and questioned why the state is spending additional budget rather than providing tax relief to improve competitiveness. |