S1464
An act to amend the Environmental Conservation Law (Extended Producer Responsibility for Packaging) — 2025-05-28 · Calendar #1216
The New York State Senate passed comprehensive Extended Producer Responsibility legislation (S1464) on a 33-25 vote Tuesday evening after nearly four hours of contentious debate, with all 25 opposing votes coming from Republicans and three senators absent.
The bill, sponsored by Sen. Pete Harckham, requires packaging producers to reduce packaging by 30% over 12 years, ban 12 toxic chemicals including PVC and cadmium from packaging, and fund a Producer Responsibility Organization to manage municipal waste infrastructure. Supporters, including Sen. Rachel May, argued the legislation addresses a public health crisis from microplastics and nanoplastics now found in human organs, and will save municipalities $1 billion over 10 years.
Opponents mounted an unprecedented coalition argument, with over 100 business and labor organizations submitting opposition memos. Republicans cited conflicting cost studies—Consumer Reports claiming zero consumer cost versus York University economist Dr. Calvin Lakhan projecting $450-$732 annual increases per household. Sen. James Stec compared the bill to the CLCPA, arguing New York is imposing stricter requirements than California, Minnesota, Maryland, and Colorado without proven benefits. Sen. John Walczyk raised food safety concerns about banning materials like Saran Wrap and PVC safety seals on packaging.
Sen. Harckham defended the bill as vital to address landfill capacity and health threats, noting he personally consulted hundreds of businesses across five bill drafts. He criticized over $2 million in special interest spending opposing the legislation. The bill now moves to the Assembly.
PASSED
Ayes: 33
· Nays: 25
· Absent: 3
Debate Summary
Extended debate on comprehensive EPR legislation requiring producers to reduce packaging by 30% over 12 years, ban toxic chemicals from packaging, and fund municipal waste management. Opponents argued the bill will increase consumer costs by $300-$732 annually per household, lacks clear definitions, and imposes unrealistic technological requirements. Supporters emphasized public health benefits from reducing microplastics and nanoplastics, municipal cost savings of $1 billion over 10 years, and alignment with other states' EPR programs.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Parker | absent | Democrat |
| Ramos | absent | Democrat |
| Sutton | absent | Democrat |
| Harckham | aye | Democrat |
| May | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Chan | nay | Republican |
| Cooney | nay | Democrat |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martinez | nay | Democrat |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Ryan, C. | nay | |
| Scarcella-Spanton | nay | Democrat |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |