← All Bills

S1477

An act to amend the Judiciary Law (Champerty law regarding sovereign debt litigation) — 2025-06-04 · Calendar #1474

The New York State Senate passed legislation Tuesday to reinstate a champerty law restricting litigation against sovereign nations, with the bill advancing on a 36-22 vote. Senate Print 1477, sponsored by Sen. Liz Krueger, would prevent investors from purchasing sovereign debt with the primary intent of suing countries unable to repay, a practice Krueger said has resulted in disruptive litigation costing billions. The bill restores protections that existed until 2004, when New York eliminated its champerty law. Krueger argued the measure protects New York's status as the world's premier jurisdiction for sovereign debt and prevents predatory actors from exploiting vulnerable nations. However, opponents including Sen. Andrew Martins and Sen. Daphne Walczyk warned the bill threatens New York's financial dominance by introducing legal uncertainty and could drive business to competing states like Texas, which recently passed legislation positioning itself as an alternative venue for sovereign debt cases. Martins argued the bill could reduce the $20 billion in annual state revenue generated by the financial industry and ultimately harm the poorest countries by making credit more expensive. The bill leaves it to courts to determine whether creditors acted in bad faith, with legitimate lenders still able to recover debts. The measure takes effect immediately upon signing.
PASSED Ayes: 36 · Nays: 22

Debate Summary

The bill would reinstate a champerty law to prevent investors from purchasing sovereign debt with the primary intent of litigating against countries unable to repay. Sponsor Sen. Krueger argued the bill protects New York's reputation as a stable financial hub and prevents predatory litigation that has cost countries and bondholders billions. Opponents, led by Sen. Martins and Sen. Walczyk, contended the bill threatens New York's position as the world's premier jurisdiction for sovereign debt by introducing legal uncertainty, could drive business to competing states like Texas, and undermines the principle that contracts must be honored regardless of the creditor's intent.

Recorded Votes

Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.

Senator Vote Party
Rivera aye Democrat
Ashby nay Republican
Borrello nay Republican
Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick nay Republican
Chan nay Republican
Gallivan nay Republican
Griffo nay Republican
Helming nay Republican
Lanza nay Republican
Martins nay Republican
Mattera nay Republican
Murray nay Republican
O'Mara nay Republican
Oberacker nay Republican
Ortt nay Republican
Palumbo nay Republican
Rhoads nay Republican
Rolison nay Republican
Stec nay Republican
Tedisco nay Republican
Walczyk nay Republican
Weber nay Republican
Weik nay Republican

Amendments

Sponsor Description Outcome
Sen. Walczyk Questioned the May 15, 2024 effective date in Section 4, paragraph (b), suggesting it may need a chapter amendment to change the date since the bill did not pass last year. not formally proposed as amendment; noted for potential correction