S1477
An act to amend the Judiciary Law (Champerty law regarding sovereign debt litigation) — 2025-06-04 · Calendar #1474
Debate Summary
The bill would reinstate a champerty law to prevent investors from purchasing sovereign debt with the primary intent of litigating against countries unable to repay. Sponsor Sen. Krueger argued the bill protects New York's reputation as a stable financial hub and prevents predatory litigation that has cost countries and bondholders billions. Opponents, led by Sen. Martins and Sen. Walczyk, contended the bill threatens New York's position as the world's premier jurisdiction for sovereign debt by introducing legal uncertainty, could drive business to competing states like Texas, and undermines the principle that contracts must be honored regardless of the creditor's intent.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Rivera | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Chan | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |
Amendments
| Sponsor | Description | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| Sen. Walczyk | Questioned the May 15, 2024 effective date in Section 4, paragraph (b), suggesting it may need a chapter amendment to change the date since the bill did not pass last year. | not formally proposed as amendment; noted for potential correction |