S8421
An act to amend the Public Service Law — 2025-06-12 · Calendar #1953
Senate Print 8421, sponsored by Sen. Krueger and amending the Public Service Law, was laid aside without debate or vote on the motion of Sen. Lanza.
Debate Summary
No debate occurred on this bill. Senator Lanza moved to lay it aside.
Customer Savings and Reliability Act (formerly New York HEAT Act) - An act to amend the Public Service Law — 2025-06-12 · Calendar #1953
The New York State Senate passed the Customer Savings and Reliability Act (S8421) on a 36-23 vote Wednesday, establishing a framework for voluntary, community-based transitions from natural gas and oil heating to alternative energy sources. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Liz Krueger, represents a revised version of the previously stalled New York HEAT Act and includes new provisions allowing utilities to opt out of participation and requiring 50 percent community approval before neighborhood transitions proceed. The legislation drew sharp criticism from Republican senators and some Democrats who questioned whether the state's aging electric grid can handle increased demand, whether ratepayers will ultimately bear infrastructure costs, and whether the transition timeline is realistic given recent warnings from the New York Independent System Operator about grid capacity constraints. Sen. Mattera argued the bill represents an unfunded mandate that will drive residents from the state, citing a 10 percent increase in utility bills since the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act's inception. Supporters, including Sen. Harckham, countered that over 2,000 New Yorkers die prematurely from fossil fuel consumption annually and that renewable energy costs are declining faster than natural gas prices. The bill requires Public Service Commission oversight and guarantees no customer will lose gas service until reliable alternatives are available. It takes effect December 31, 2025.
PASSED
Ayes: 36
· Nays: 23
Debate Summary
The bill establishes a framework for voluntary, community-based transitions from natural gas and oil heating to alternative energy sources like solar, geothermal, and heat pumps. Supporters argue it will reduce utility costs long-term and address climate concerns, while opponents contend it will increase ratepayer costs, jeopardize grid reliability, and harm workers in the gas utility industry. Key debate centered on cost allocation, grid capacity, community consent requirements, and whether the transition timeline is feasible given current electric grid constraints.
Recorded Votes
Recorded votes are predominantly dissenting (nay) votes captured from roll call records.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Harckham | aye | Democrat |
| Ashby | nay | Republican |
| Baskin | nay | Democrat |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| C. Ryan | nay | |
| Canzoneri-Fitzpatrick | nay | Republican |
| Chan | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Griffo | nay | Republican |
| Helming | nay | Republican |
| Lanza | nay | Republican |
| Martins | nay | Republican |
| Mattera | nay | Republican |
| O'Mara | nay | Republican |
| Oberacker | nay | Republican |
| Ortt | nay | Republican |
| Palumbo | nay | Republican |
| Rhoads | nay | Republican |
| Rolison | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
| Weber | nay | Republican |
| Weik | nay | Republican |