R Sen. Robert Ortt
Key Issues
Penal
Education
Tax
Executive
Vehicle and Traffic
Criminal Procedure
Public Authorities
Public Health
From floor debate, and bill sponsorship.
Legislative Activity (2025–2026)
Floor votes
1,410
Party alignment
91.9%
Hearing engagements
0
Bills sponsored
0
Based on complete Senate roll call records.
Top Co-Sponsors
District 62 Profile
Population
317,709
Median income
$67,971
Median rent
$855
Homeownership
72.6%
Education (BA+)
27.3%
Poverty rate
12.2%
Voter Registration
Demographics
White
86.4%
Black
5.7%
Hispanic
4.1%
Asian
1.1%
Voting Record
1015 Aye
395 Nay
33 Excused
Dissenting Votes by Topic
Environmental Conservation
30 nay
Public Health
27 nay
General Business
23 nay
Resolutions, Senate
22 nay
Education
21 nay
Election
20 nay
Executive
20 nay
Correction
13 nay
Public Service
13 nay
Tax
13 nay
Public Authorities
12 nay
General Municipal
11 nay
Civil Practice Law and Rules
10 nay
Criminal Procedure
9 nay
Labor
9 nay
Taxation
8 nay
Social Services
7 nay
Vehicle and Traffic
7 nay
Budget Bills
6 nay
Insurance
6 nay
Penal
6 nay
Banking
5 nay
Judiciary
5 nay
Real Property
5 nay
Appropriations
4 nay
Cannabis
4 nay
Real Property Tax
4 nay
Workers' Compensation
4 nay
General Obligations
3 nay
Legislative
3 nay
Multiple Dwelling
3 nay
New York City Administrative Code
3 nay
Public Housing
3 nay
Real Property Actions and Proceedings
3 nay
Civil Rights
2 nay
Domestic Relations
2 nay
Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 1974
2 nay
Energy
2 nay
Energy
2 nay
Environmental Conservation
2 nay
Estates, Powers and Trusts
2 nay
Lien
2 nay
Public Officers
2 nay
Public Services
2 nay
Surrogate's Court Procedure Act
2 nay
Transportation
2 nay
29 additional dissenting votes across other topics
From 1,443 recorded floor votes via OpenLeg API. Dissenting votes grouped by law section to reveal policy patterns.
Floor Speeches: In Opposition (4)
Voted in the negative on the Education Law amendment.
Voted in opposition to the measure.
Voted in opposition to the measure.
Delivered extensive closing remarks characterizing the provision as 'gross' and 'disgusting,' noting it was not in the Governor's original budget proposal and was introduced during final negotiations. Argued the public understands this is designed to benefit specific individuals and criticized the majority for voting for it despite discomfort.