S3155
An act to amend the Insurance Law to expand in vitro fertilization coverage — 2026-01-27 · Calendar #55
Debate Summary
Sen. Cooney explained his support for legislation expanding IVF coverage in New York. The bill addresses insurance company practices that require couples to use all embryos from one cycle before covering the next cycle, which Cooney argued delays treatment and limits options for families seeking to start families later in life. Cooney noted the bill builds on 2019 legislation requiring coverage for three IVF cycles and positions New York as a leader in reproductive healthcare access.
Recorded Votes
Individual vote records shown here are captured from roll call mentions in floor transcripts. Because most bills pass with unanimous or near-unanimous ayes, only dissenting (nay) votes are typically read into the record — so the table below skews toward no votes. The full tally (ayes/nays above) reflects the official count.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Griffo | aye | Republican |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Gallivan | nay | Republican |
| Murray | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |
An act to amend the Insurance Law regarding in vitro fertilization coverage — 2025-06-09 · Calendar #1683
Debate Summary
Sen. Cooney explained his legislation to expand IVF coverage and access in New York State. He noted that while the Legislature passed landmark IVF coverage legislation in 2019 requiring coverage for three cycles, insurance companies and healthcare practices have since required couples to use all embryos in a cycle before covering the next cycle, creating delays and potential health risks. Cooney argued the bill would address these insurance practices and create more opportunities for New Yorkers seeking to start families.
Recorded Votes
Individual vote records shown here are captured from roll call mentions in floor transcripts. Because most bills pass with unanimous or near-unanimous ayes, only dissenting (nay) votes are typically read into the record — so the table below skews toward no votes. The full tally (ayes/nays above) reflects the official count.
| Senator | Vote | Party |
|---|---|---|
| Cooney | aye | Democrat |
| Borrello | nay | Republican |
| Stec | nay | Republican |
| Tedisco | nay | Republican |
| Walczyk | nay | Republican |